Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
View Poll Results: What do you think?
Legalize nationally 132 57.89%
Ban nationally 20 8.77%
Let states decide; federal government shouldn't interfere 76 33.33%
Voters: 228. You may not vote on this poll

Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 02-23-2017, 07:03 PM
 
41,813 posts, read 51,068,169 times
Reputation: 17865

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by AlongTheI-5 View Post
Let the 21st century prohibition begin. I'm sure organized crime cant wait.
Honestly I wouldn't be to concerned about it. Here is my prediction... Trump and the Republicans will reach across the aisle for a compromise on something they want. Democrats and Republicans in moderate districts will support it and politicians in the few areas where this could harm them will oppose it.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 02-23-2017, 07:05 PM
 
10,920 posts, read 6,914,310 times
Reputation: 4942
This seems like a giant waste of time and resources.

I don't smoke pot, and I don't advocate that people do - but this is such a non-issue. Let's freaking legalize it and be done with it. It's no more destructive than cigarettes or alcohol (if anything, those both could be argued as being worse).

Legalization will also help get rid of the terrible drug cartels in Mexico (although they'll still exist to supply other drugs), and free up our federal resources to tackle more important issues.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-23-2017, 07:06 PM
 
Location: The Republic of Texas
78,863 posts, read 46,645,820 times
Reputation: 18521
The only authority the federal government has over POT, is the ability to Tax it. Like alcohol, there is no other authorization for them to have a say. Refer to the 10th Amendment on it.
If the government could tax the air we breathe, they would.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-23-2017, 07:07 PM
 
Location: San Diego, CA
1,702 posts, read 1,920,404 times
Reputation: 1305
Quote:
Originally Posted by marino760 View Post
What planet do you live on? Have you ever tried depriving a pot head of his/her pot? They'll do almost anything for it and I'm not talking for medical reasons. They're just as addicted as any tobacco user.
Oh stop, nobody ever jacked a 7-11 to get money to buy pot.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-23-2017, 07:07 PM
 
41,813 posts, read 51,068,169 times
Reputation: 17865
Quote:
Originally Posted by Enigma777 View Post
Like I said. This is war. This admin will have legal battles for everything it attempts to do and every fascist move it makes. Attorneys will boom over the next four years.

Every breathe they take, every move they make, we'll be watching them.

Washington state will resist federal crackdown on legal weed, AG Ferguson says | The Seattle Times

Washington ready to fight if necessary to keep its legal pot - KXLY
Th courts is the proper place to address this, I wish them luck but I have to wonder how they will win such a battle. If the federal government can't govern weed that leaves open the door they can't govern any drug.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-23-2017, 07:08 PM
 
Location: Stillwater, Oklahoma
30,976 posts, read 21,646,641 times
Reputation: 9676
Quote:
Originally Posted by T-310 View Post
Oh my, God forbid I can't use a mind altering substance.

The horrors.
So, you still have the freedom to drink alcohol until you see in doubles.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-23-2017, 07:08 PM
 
Location: Former land of plenty
3,212 posts, read 1,653,319 times
Reputation: 2017
Quote:
Originally Posted by BentBow View Post
The only authority the federal government has over POT, is the ability to Tax it. Like alcohol, there is no other authorization for them to have a say. Refer to the 10th Amendment on it.
If the government could tax the air we breathe, they would.
It was tax evasion that brought down Al Capone.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-23-2017, 07:08 PM
 
Location: Live:Downtown Phoenix, AZ/Work:Greater Los Angeles, CA
27,606 posts, read 14,610,214 times
Reputation: 9169
Quote:
Originally Posted by thecoalman View Post
Th courts is the proper place to address this, I wish them luck but I have to wonder how they will win such a battle. If the federal government can't govern weed that leaves open the door they can't govern any drug.
That's not true, they could just move weed up to Schedule IV or Schedule V from it's current ridiculous Schedule I

I mean, even cocaine and meth are Schedule II ffs
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-23-2017, 07:08 PM
 
5,719 posts, read 6,449,725 times
Reputation: 3647
Quote:
Originally Posted by FirebirdCamaro1220 View Post
Marijuana is not habit forming, and doesn't create a chemical dependency like alcohol, cigarettes or heroin or crack

I disagree with this. It is a lifestyle for many.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-23-2017, 07:09 PM
 
Location: Home is Where You Park It
23,856 posts, read 13,758,293 times
Reputation: 15482
Quote:
Originally Posted by thecoalman View Post
Non enforcement of the law is by default changing the law.
No, it isn't.

As I noted, every single agency head, at the federal, state, and local levels, routinely does this. Because no agency head has enough dollars to fully implement every single law that is under their purview.

If you don't believe me, just pick a local agency and have an in-depth conversation with its head about her/his budget, and how s/he allocates the available money. Now you'll probably have to be subtle about it, because most of them will be cautious about saying it bluntly to someone they don't know. But I can assure you that it is the case.

(Yes, I've listened to quite a few agency heads discussing their budgets with legislators.)
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 03:46 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top