Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
We've went round and round sleepy2
You do not respect anything about my views
You want to kill innocent babies...How dare you or others decide who is "Viable"
You are deciding what is viable though, aren't you? Or are you claiming that viability doesn't matter and an embryo is a baby? You really need to quit accusing other posters of things that they did not say, it's really a crappy way to argue.
go look at PP's audited financials, they do not mix abortion and federal funding. I'm not sure why people continue repeating it when it would take them a hot 2 minutes to find the financials and prove to themselves that they are wrong.
They perform abortions. They receive Federal funding. That's a mix. I don't need to look at "audited financials" to see they are mixing the two.
You are deciding what is viable though, aren't you? Or are you claiming that viability doesn't matter and an embryo is a baby? You really need to quit accusing other posters of things that they did not say, it's really a crappy way to argue.
You falsely accused me of not posting valid links while you posted JUST ONE.
We've been in this conversation for a while now. You've gotten PLENTY of links.
Government supports abortion PERIOD
Those that advocate for the torture and killing of the innocent have no problems lying here, over and over,
But considering the horror being pushed upon us, why would I be dumb enough to give the benefit of the doubt??
But I still try to see the good in people.
But... it's not like I didn't expect you to come forward sooner or later getting sneaky
And soon, sneakier
Only you are deciding who is viable, not me. And trying to engage me in the discussion
One that people like you, Hitler, and Andrew Jackson engage in which results in the torture of innocent victims and murder. And others
Only you, and others you are in good company with, ^^ use that as an excuse to slaughter innocent human beings
They perform abortions. They receive Federal funding. That's a mix. I don't need to look at "audited financials" to see they are mixing the two.
That's just silly
Imagine you are in line at the grocery store. The customer in front of you buys a can of beans with a SNAP card. You buy a bottle of wine and pay with cash. Then the next person in line angrily accuses you of wasting taxpayer money by buying alcohol with food stamps. You'd probably be confused. The argument against you is that because the grocery store accepts food stamps from some customers, and because money is fungible, then you, by osmosis, have paid for your wine with food stamps. Sounds stupid, but that's the exact argument that Republicans have been pushing the "money is fungible" line, most recently used by Rep. Jim Sensenbrenner in an anti–Planned Parenthood congressional hearing. It implies that while Planned Parenthood is supposed to be getting money for contraception, it's actually going to subsidize abortion
One that people like you, Hitler, and Andrew Jackson engage in which results in the torture of innocent victims and murder. And others Only you, and others you are in good company with, ^^ use that as an excuse to slaughter innocent human beings
I say yes. PP claims no federal funds used for abortion. So why do they have a problem with defunding?
If I am not mistaken they defunded all services. Abortions were never funded, so this does not reduce abortions on any way. As a matter of fact it will probably increase them, since some women won't be able to get contraceptives.
Not really. My current OB/GYN practice doesn't do abortions. As a result, they eliminate problems associated with doing them.
PP could eliminate all their continuous problems with funding by just not doing them. They allege it's just just a small amount of what they do anyways. Yet they continue to bring on their own problems.
Not really. My current OB/GYN practice doesn't do abortions. As a result, they eliminate problems associated with doing them.
PP could eliminate all their continuous problems with funding by just not doing them. They allege it's just just a small amount of what they do anyways. Yet they continue to bring on their own problems.
Not really what? And what does PP have to do with your current OB/GYN practice? Abortions are legal whether you like that or not. I would much rather have a woman go to PP for an abortion than have her boyfriend kick her in the stomach until she miscarried, and yes that did used to happen.
If I am not mistaken they defunded all services. Abortions were never funded, so this does not reduce abortions on any way. As a matter of fact it will probably increase them, since some women won't be able to get contraceptives.
They are ONLY defunding the abortions, that's it.
And they are using the HONOR SYSTEM as posted earlier to do it.
Hoping PP will in turn, use that $$ for other services offered as ordered
They are de-funding one segment of PP
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
