Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 05-26-2017, 01:04 PM
 
778 posts, read 339,631 times
Reputation: 367

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by cuebald View Post
"Pro-life" should be change to "pro-zygote". Once the child is born it's on it's own as far as they are concerned.
A lie and leftist canard,
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 05-27-2017, 10:46 PM
 
16,212 posts, read 10,830,864 times
Reputation: 8442
Quote:
Originally Posted by pknopp View Post
I never said that. There were very few doctors performing them. Numbers are irrelevant. Not many people rob banks either but it's still wrong.

When we first looked to ban this procedure the doctors that were performing these noted that they were mostly "purely elective".

After viability there is never a reason to intentionally kill a fetus.

Is this a biased source? It is but the testimony is what it is.

And I'll be quite frank: most of my abortions are elective in that 20-24 week range. . . . In my particular case, probably 20% [of this procedure] are for genetic reasons. And the other 80% are purely elective.

https://www.nrlc.org/archive/abortio...pbafact10.html



You do not know "people" who had abortions after 20 weeks unless you worked for one of these doctors and we will note that in your second scenario, there was no abortion performed.



A generalization that means nothing.
Your link is from a pro-life organization that provides information from 1996, which was 21 years ago.

Again, I personally know people who have had this procedure due to fatal anomalies of the fetus. They wanted the baby.

That does not mean that that is the only reason for it being done later in the pregnancy.

However, I do not wish to impart my personal views on anyone's family situation. Most women get abortions because they don't want to be pregnant or to be a mother to a child (or another child). I respect their decision and don't feel that children should be born to people who decide they don't want a child or cannot take care of a child or they have some other sort of personal problem (like drug use or lack of finances) to properly care for a child. I respect a woman who knows her limits and who especially puts her already born children and their needs before a unwanted pregnancy. I would hope they make that decision earlier in the pregnancy, mostly because abortions become more dangerous as the pregnancy progresses. But I respect the decisions of women, their families and their medical providers to live their lives as they see fit. So even if they are elective, I don't think it is any of my business.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-27-2017, 11:56 PM
 
Location: White House, TN
6,486 posts, read 6,189,271 times
Reputation: 4584
I am pro-life because the baby in the womb is a human life, and killing it is murder. I am also anti-death penalty and anti-war unless our country is in jeopardy.

I agree with holistic sex ed, free distribution of condoms, and believe that adoption is a viable option for those who do not want or cannot raise kids. I believe that contraception (such as condoms, the pill, etc) is a good idea.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 03:50 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top