Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 06-10-2017, 02:32 PM
 
34,619 posts, read 21,615,505 times
Reputation: 22232

Advertisements

Biden would have won 2016.

The DNC has now fully paid off its debt to Hillary for not throwing Bill under the bus.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 06-10-2017, 02:34 PM
 
52,431 posts, read 26,628,813 times
Reputation: 21097
Quote:
Originally Posted by MPowering1 View Post
I think people estimated Hillary's popularity to be greater than it was simply because Bill Clinton and Barack Obama were popular.....
Obama was not popular by 2016 with the working class and middle America. That is why Democrats were devastated in the US House, US Senate, and state government, and governor's houses. (aside from losing the presidency)

Bill Clinton was irrelevant. He had a hard time getting 100 people to show up at his campaign events.

Anyone who saw this knew Trump was going to send Hillary to the pasture. I said it time and time again on this forum for over a year.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-10-2017, 02:44 PM
 
14,489 posts, read 6,098,111 times
Reputation: 6842
I have no idea why the left pushed Hillary Clinton so much, other than just to have "first woman president"
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-10-2017, 02:46 PM
 
34,057 posts, read 17,071,203 times
Reputation: 17212
Quote:
Originally Posted by dashrendar4454 View Post
I have no idea why the left pushed Hillary Clinton so much, other than just to have "first woman president"
They will run First Transgender in '20, first Intergalactic in '24.

LOL.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-10-2017, 02:47 PM
 
Location: So Cal
52,269 posts, read 52,686,640 times
Reputation: 52778
Quote:
Originally Posted by michiganmoon View Post
Biden encourages 2012 foe Romney to run for the Senate - POLITICO

Biden said that Hillary was "never a great candidate" and that she lost, because of her own doing.

He didn't mention Russia.

He also thinks that Mitt Romney should run for US Senate out of Utah.


Interesting to see Biden continue not to jump on the Democratic finger pointing bandwagon as he is rumored to be considering a 1 term run in 2020.
I've seen a couple of clips of Biden talking about why Clinton lost and he was mostly on point. He's probably about one of the only few prominent Dems that sorta gets it. Clinton is running around blaming everyone but herself for the most part. She's throwing out sexism, Comey, which is BS because to me it looked like Comey was bending over backwards to not make her look bad.

She missed the boat on the war on terror, immigration and a few other things as well.

Her saying that half of Trump supporters were deplorable certain didn't help for the people that were on the fence. I get that Trump has said a lot of stupid stuff as well, but her comment really is an indicator that she's an out of touch DC elite that doesn't frankly have a grip on the average man's plight in this country.

The economy, affordable health care, a secure border, getting terrorism under control, those are things that probably matter more to a lot of people. Some of the more progressive stuff like gender issues and bathrooms and stuff like that just doesn't really fly with most people, just not at the level that anyone really at the end of the day feels is that important.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-10-2017, 03:23 PM
 
26,497 posts, read 15,074,947 times
Reputation: 14644
Quote:
Originally Posted by dsjj251 View Post
She was not campaigning in New York or California or Massachusetts, she was fundraising, something both Democrats and Republicans do in states they can not win or will win by a mile.


Arguing that she should have spent more time in the other 3 states is fine, but the comparison argument doesnt work because context matters
Yes, most, but not all of those Hillary "Goldman Sachs" Clinton events in CA, MA, and NY were fundraisers for the well-to-do.

However, Hillary did have regular campaign spots in CA, MA, and NY. Hillary ignored Wisconsin - she didn't even step foot in the state once post-convention.

Hillary was an idiot.

Hillary made horrible choices in managing her campaign.

She had regular traditional campaign events with the masses in CA, MA, and NY - but none in Wisconsin. Hillary was the first major presidential candidate since 1972 to not visit Wisconsin. Even Stein and Johnson hit Wisconsin. She barely hit Michigan and PA post convention too.

She:
(1) ignored visiting the Rust Belt swing states except Ohio
(2) disparaged blue collar white voters that fear the loss of their jobs
(3) ignored local democrats that begged her to give an economic message to blue collar white voters
(4) ignored data from local democrats that the race was close there and she was losing blue collar white voters

Hillary literally told state of Michigan leaders that they were wrong that the state was close, that they needed to literally throw out all of their polling data that said it was close, and that they could no longer contact her - she would contact them, since they were paranoid that Michigan was close, when she was going to easily win it and keep the blue collar white vote.

....but yeah...Russia....

She is a fool, period.

http://www.politico.com/story/2016/1...n-trump-232547

Clinton loses Wisconsin after ignoring it - Business Insider

Last edited by michiganmoon; 06-10-2017 at 03:34 PM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-10-2017, 03:33 PM
 
Location: Texas
37,949 posts, read 17,865,154 times
Reputation: 10371
Quote:
Originally Posted by michiganmoon View Post
Biden encourages 2012 foe Romney to run for the Senate - POLITICO

Biden said that Hillary was "never a great candidate" and that she lost, because of her own doing.

He didn't mention Russia.

He also thinks that Mitt Romney should run for US Senate out of Utah.


Interesting to see Biden continue not to jump on the Democratic finger pointing bandwagon as he is rumored to be considering a 1 term run in 2020.
For bailouts
For keeping us in never ending wars in the Middle East
for government mandated healthcare

Yea that's what the repubs really need at this point, obama lite.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-10-2017, 04:58 PM
 
34,619 posts, read 21,615,505 times
Reputation: 22232
Quote:
Originally Posted by dashrendar4454 View Post
I have no idea why the left pushed Hillary Clinton so much, other than just to have "first woman president"
The DNC machine still owed her for standing by Bill.

Back when he was their golden boy, she kept her mouth shut and he wasn't Gary Hart II.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-10-2017, 05:46 PM
 
8,131 posts, read 4,328,096 times
Reputation: 4683
Quote:
Originally Posted by michiganmoon View Post
Biden encourages 2012 foe Romney to run for the Senate - POLITICO

Biden said that Hillary was "never a great candidate" and that she lost, because of her own doing.

He didn't mention Russia.

He also thinks that Mitt Romney should run for US Senate out of Utah.


Interesting to see Biden continue not to jump on the Democratic finger pointing bandwagon as he is rumored to be considering a 1 term run in 2020.

Clinton would defeat Biden in the 2020 Democratic primary.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-10-2017, 05:51 PM
 
26,497 posts, read 15,074,947 times
Reputation: 14644
Quote:
Originally Posted by tillman7 View Post
Clinton would defeat Biden in the 2020 Democratic primary.
If the DNC rigged it for her again and gave her debate questions in advance.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top