Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
In less than 24 hours, the news of the first indictment from Russiagate is likely to be the top news story around the world and someone from Trump's campaign team will likely be placed under arrest. They'll likely turn themselves in discretely, rather than get hauled away in public and arrested with cameras rolling.
We'll probably find out who is arrested when it's announced that the person is in custody and is being fingerprinted and jailed while their attorneys furiously work the court system and give statements on their client's behalf.
Shall we all chant in unison:
"Lock him up! Lock him up!! Lock him up"
Last edited by sware2cod; 10-29-2017 at 09:00 AM..
In less 24 hours, the news of the first indictment from Russiagate is likely to be the top news story around the world and someone from Trump's campaign team will likely be placed under arrest. They'll likely turn themselves in discretely, rather than get hauled away in public and arrested with cameras rolling.
We'll probably find out who is arrested when it's announced that the person is in custody and is being fingerprinted and jailed while their attorneys furiously work the court system and give statements on their client's behalf.
Shall we all chant in unison:
"Lock him up! Lock him up!! Lock him up"
Sure..find some guy who had shady private business dealings with Russia and arrest him.
Has nothing to do with the election and nothing to do with the accusations about Trump in the dossier.
More like throw someone, anyone to the lions to keep the crowd happy.
So you want to arrest a guy with shady business dealings with Russia?
I thought Trump was your guy?
Now you're calling for his arrest?
What's going on here?
I have voted Libertarian for the past 5 elections. I don't believe either the R or D party care about the people.
And nowhere was I calling for Trump's arrest. I was merely pointing out that arresting someone based on private shady dealings with Russia has NOTHING to do with the 2016 campaign, the DNC break in or accusations against Trump.
It seems the focus now is arresting someone, anyone to keep the crowds happy.
Sure..find some guy who had shady private business dealings with Russia and arrest him. Has nothing to do with the election and nothing to do with the accusations about Trump in the dossier. More like throw someone, anyone to the lions to keep the crowd happy.
lol, yes indeed the most likely subjects of this indictment had nothing to do with Trump or the campaign
Paul Manafort - Campaign manager
Michael Flynn - National Security advisor, hired in Feb 2016 as advisor to Trump campaign
Carter Page Former Trump Foreign Policy advisor, Last summer, the FBI obtained a FISA warrant to monitor his communications as part of its investigation into Russia.
or maybe Donald Trump Jr, Jared Kushner, Roger Stone?
They don't have to find some 'random person' who had shady business dealings with Russia, the Trump team is crawling with them
lol, yes indeed the most likely subjects of this indictment had nothing to do with Trump or the campaign
Paul Manafort - Campaign manager
Michael Flynn - National Security advisor, hired in Feb 2016 as advisor to Trump campaign
Carter Page Former Trump Foreign Policy advisor, Last summer, the FBI obtained a FISA warrant to monitor his communications as part of its investigation into Russia.
or maybe Donald Trump Jr, Jared Kushner, Roger Stone?
They don't have to find some 'random person' who had shady business dealings with Russia, the Trump team is crawling with them
But if they are charged for dealings outside of the actual campaign then what does that do for the initial focus of the investigation ?
I guess it's a wait and see on who gets charged and what they are charged with.
Everyone did not think Iraq had had Weapons of Mass Destruction.
Rice carried on about mushroom clouds, but there is no credible evidence to support Iraq ever had nuclear weapons.
Cheney hauled out the con man Ahmed Chalabi to lie. Collin Powell stated he was lied to.
The intelligence community did not support this lie, stated there was no evidence whatsoever of Iraq getting yellowcake from Niger as Cheney maintained.
There is absolutely no credible evidence that Iraq possessed nuclear weapons of any sort, either before the invasion or after.
Actually it is YOU who are misinformed. WMD's = chemical & biological & nuclear. WMD's do not just mean nuclear. There is NO DEBATE that Iraq had chemical weapons in the 80's. None. Iraq used them against the Iranians and they used them against the Kurds. Saddam had a bio program. No debate about that either. Whether or not they had a nuclear program is more questionable.
Actually it is YOU who are misinformed. WMD's = chemical & biological & nuclear. WMD's do not just mean nuclear. There is NO DEBATE that Iraq had chemical weapons in the 80's. None. Iraq used them against the Iranians and they used them against the Kurds. Saddam had a bio program. No debate about that either. Whether or not they had a nuclear program is more questionable.
Baloney.
U.S. did not invade Iraq over chemical weapons.
Rice spoke of mushroom clouds, i.e. nuclear weapons, not clouds of chemicals.
The fuss over yellowcake from Niger had nothing to do with chemical weapons.
Whether Iraq had a nuclear program is not questionable in the least. Absolutely no evidence here.
Bush was not onstage looking under imaginary furniture for chemical weapons.
There would be no reason for the U.S. to invade Iraq over chemical weapons.
You are posting bogus BS.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
