Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Sigh. The questions here are:
1. Should we respond? Or should Japan perhaps?
2. what would be a proportional response?
I think perhaps we should respond, but im not completely sold on it. So im OK either way.
If we do respond, I don't think it should cause any casualties. So perhaps something fired from the yellow sea, over North Korea, and into the japan sea? Maybe for funsies a air launched tomahawk for a change of pace?
Japan should respond with 100 death robots to burn the North Korean countryside.
Remember all the bragging a couple weeks ago from the so-called President about how he backed Kim down? Japanese are running for their lives while NK shoots a missile through their air space. Kim has made a fool of Trump.
NK has been a problem for years there's no way you can blame it on a president that's only been in the seat less than a year.
Bannon is right. Kim won. There is nothing we can do. There is nothing we could ever do without horrific costs to South Korea. The outcome was inevitable. Time to move on.
This might be the only thing I've ever agreed with Brannon about.
They've always had the world by the nuts. It's not a partisan issue.
Remember all the bragging a couple weeks ago from the so-called President about how he backed Kim down? Japanese are running for their lives while NK shoots a missile through their air space. Kim has made a fool of Trump.
or... Kim is much more of a psychopath than you imagined.............
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.