Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 09-07-2017, 02:06 PM
 
18,805 posts, read 8,479,367 times
Reputation: 4131

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by 10 2 4 View Post
Now we know why the "bill" for 2 hrs use of a tiny "bed" in an ER open bay, divided only with curtains, was $10,000 exclusive of all other services such as Nurse, Doctor, therapist, meds and supplies used.

Yep, there it is in black and white.

Meanwhile back in the free-market Elective procedure arena, prices are very low and quality very high, thanks to COMPETITION and the absence of funding by OPM.
More simple medical and optional surgical encounters can be relatively more free marketed. But when things get seriously acute and complex and life threatening, free markets have next to no influence. Closest ER and quick, and do what you need to do! You can't price shop an acute and serious ER need. In some cases you can and do 'shop' qualifications.

Again check with the hospital and find out what reimbursement they accepted.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 09-07-2017, 02:06 PM
 
330 posts, read 177,608 times
Reputation: 168
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hoonose View Post
Of course the try. But try as they may, there is no direct path.

Hospitals are not typical businesses like car dealers where they simply do not sell to no payers.

This is why it was so important to hospitals to go with Medicaid expansions. i.e. limit their no payers, to reduce their losses. Private insurance will not agree to cover these patients/losses.
Agree with it, probably not, being to detect the slight bump in price ultimately paid by "paying customers" definitely not. They are paying for it, knowingly or unknowingly.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-07-2017, 02:07 PM
 
330 posts, read 177,608 times
Reputation: 168
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hoonose View Post
More simple medical and optional surgical encounters can be relatively more free marketed. But when things get seriously acute and complex and life threatening, free markets have next to no influence. Closest ER and quick, and do what you need to do! You can't price shop an acute and serious ER need. In some cases you can and do 'shop' qualifications.

Again check with the hospital and find out what reimbursement they accepted.
Still, having said that, the absence of OPM will reduce costs overall - including in ERs.

Last edited by 10 2 4; 09-07-2017 at 02:32 PM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-07-2017, 02:31 PM
 
18,805 posts, read 8,479,367 times
Reputation: 4131
Quote:
Originally Posted by 10 2 4 View Post
Agree with it, probably not, being to detect the slight bump in price ultimately paid by "paying customers" definitely not. They are paying for it, knowingly or unknowingly.
Of course they know. They have very serious bargaining power in most locales.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-07-2017, 02:33 PM
 
Location: Wisconsin
37,981 posts, read 22,167,958 times
Reputation: 13811
Quote:
Originally Posted by Marleinie View Post
Kamala Harris announces she will co-sponsor single-payer healthcare | TheHill


You know with her on it it's bound to be a disaster.
Yeah, cuz tyranny by the federal government is cool.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-07-2017, 02:38 PM
 
18,805 posts, read 8,479,367 times
Reputation: 4131
Quote:
Originally Posted by 10 2 4 View Post
Still having said that, the absence of OPM will reduce costs overall - including in ERs.
OPM includes taxes, other individuals insured and deficit spending.

Take away all that, and 99% of people who experienced the accident my wife did on 1/1/17 would be dead.

And the same 99% would be dead again vs surviving her lymphoma.

Yes HC spending would go WAY down! ER not as much since payment is specifically not required.

Docs will simply close their practice if they don't make their typical office overhead. And hospitals will fail.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-07-2017, 02:50 PM
 
330 posts, read 177,608 times
Reputation: 168
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hoonose View Post
OPM includes taxes, other individuals insured and deficit spending.

Take away all that, and 99% of people who experienced the accident my wife did on 1/1/17 would be dead.

And the same 99% would be dead again vs surviving her lymphoma.

Yes HC spending would go WAY down! ER not as much since payment is specifically not required.

Docs will simply close their practice if they don't make their typical office overhead. And hospitals will fail.
As OPM dried up, you will find that other expenses shrink as well.


If you want to see the corrupting influence of OPM, witness higher educations costs going up and up like a skyrocket.
Why?


OPM in the form of Student Loans, now run fully by Uncle Sam. The more loan money made available, the higher the tuition and related expenses go to keep up and absorb all that extra money.


I attended college from 72 to 78 BS and MS. Tuition was about $400 a Quarter in a State run University in the Midwest. We had about 13,000 students. We paid out-of-pocket. Now, prices are out of sight to absorb all that loan money, and student "graduate" owing many tens of thousands of $$$$.


Can you imagine how much an oil change would cost, if they billed your car insurance company, and you paid a co-pay. Sky's the limit, yahootee is paying.


While there is a role for "insurance" in the medical field for extreme cases, in most cases, use your own money and get a much better price.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-07-2017, 03:22 PM
 
18,805 posts, read 8,479,367 times
Reputation: 4131
Quote:
Originally Posted by 10 2 4 View Post
As OPM dried up, you will find that other expenses shrink as well.


If you want to see the corrupting influence of OPM, witness higher educations costs going up and up like a skyrocket.
Why?


OPM in the form of Student Loans, now run fully by Uncle Sam. The more loan money made available, the higher the tuition and related expenses go to keep up and absorb all that extra money.


I attended college from 72 to 78 BS and MS. Tuition was about $400 a Quarter in a State run University in the Midwest. We had about 13,000 students. We paid out-of-pocket. Now, prices are out of sight to absorb all that loan money, and student "graduate" owing many tens of thousands of $$$$.


Can you imagine how much an oil change would cost, if they billed your car insurance company, and you paid a co-pay. Sky's the limit, yahootee is paying.


While there is a role for "insurance" in the medical field for extreme cases, in most cases, use your own money and get a much better price.
No question. More simple medical concerns are easy without insurance. Our HC cost conundrum has to do with the uninsurables. And there is no humane way to satisfy that without OPM.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-07-2017, 03:44 PM
 
330 posts, read 177,608 times
Reputation: 168
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hoonose View Post
No question. More simple medical concerns are easy without insurance. Our HC cost conundrum has to do with the uninsurables. And there is no humane way to satisfy that without OPM.
Then they better start saving their $$$$ and working their tails off to pay their own way. It simply isn't fair for some to be held as financial hostages by those less-responsible in the conduct of their lives. If their irresponsibility means they live a shortened life, well, they made their choices. Also, there are charities than can do some things.


It's kind of like building your house in a flood zone and not buying flood insurance, then asking to be financially bailed out when your house is wiped out. They want everyone else to pay them, but did they bother to help everyone out with the money they saved by not paying premiums? No, they just want the best of both worlds.


I know this for a fact, the more OPM in the mix, the higher costs will go, and the lower service quality will go. It is simply human nature to care less when it is money from some distant, unknown source, than when it came from the toil of your back and sweat of your brow.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-07-2017, 03:46 PM
 
Location: Secure Bunker
5,461 posts, read 3,237,836 times
Reputation: 5269
Quote:
Originally Posted by ahzzie View Post
If enough people feel that it should be a right then it will be a right. All rights are granted by people.
That has to be one of the scariest things I've read in a long time.

Good grief.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 12:43 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top