Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 09-08-2017, 04:23 PM
 
3,594 posts, read 1,795,576 times
Reputation: 4726

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by 10 2 4 View Post
Precisely.
My god we can never let the far left control the federal government. These people are insane. At least the "do nothing" republicans aren't trying political experiments on us.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 09-08-2017, 04:29 PM
 
330 posts, read 177,608 times
Reputation: 168
Quote:
Originally Posted by man4857 View Post
I don't care whether wars are freebies/constitutionally authorized or not. If you're fiscally concerned, you won't go to war UNLESS you have to, and if you do, get out fast and not stay there for a decade AND find a way to pay for it either by (1) increasing taxes or (2) decreasing expenses or (3) both.

That's the same issue you have with single payer. Except we're just shifting expenses into domestic issues to improve our own lives instead of fighting endless wars. What's better, building tanks or funding health?
Unfortunately, in this world of evil-doers, tanks are necessary in order to have health care.




I'm all for decreasing spending - eliminate all welfare programs at the Fed. level. End federal meddling in education, including funding schools etc., and a host of extra-Constitutional forays into spending/controlling.


The answer to fixing things that are broken, is NOT more of what broke them - in this case FEDERAL SPENDING benefiting individuals, i.e. entitlements. The answer is LESS of what broke them - MUCH less, parasites-be-damned.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-08-2017, 05:09 PM
 
Location: Live:Downtown Phoenix, AZ/Work:Greater Los Angeles, CA
27,606 posts, read 14,619,501 times
Reputation: 9169
Quote:
Originally Posted by 10 2 4 View Post
Unfortunately, in this world of evil-doers, tanks are necessary in order to have health care.




I'm all for decreasing spending - eliminate all welfare programs at the Fed. level. End federal meddling in education, including funding schools etc., and a host of extra-Constitutional forays into spending/controlling.


The answer to fixing things that are broken, is NOT more of what broke them - in this case FEDERAL SPENDING benefiting individuals, i.e. entitlements. The answer is LESS of what broke them - MUCH less, parasites-be-damned.
Again, your answer is total social darwinism. That's not going to fly😒
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-08-2017, 05:23 PM
 
18,805 posts, read 8,479,367 times
Reputation: 4131
Quote:
Originally Posted by 10 2 4 View Post
It may never be paid off, but it is rolled-over, and when interest rates go up, well, you'll see how much it costs to service the debt.
We basically direct the interest rates from the bottom via the Fed/Treasury. So rates there go up if and when they dictate. Benefits vs risks.

IMO we are in a low interest scenario short/medium term maybe longer. Maybe a bit up, not drastic to matter much. If push comes to shove down the road, first off we can issue more short term debt with lower rates.

And then we can use other means in the distant future.

http://www.nakedcapitalism.com/2017/...ual-bonds.html

If China Can Fund infrastructure with Its Own Credit, So Can*We: Ellen Brown ~ Mike Norman Economics

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Trillion_dollar_coin

Issue money without associated debt.

All far off ideas, but potentially doable.

Japan is way far beyond us and doing well enough.

Japan's economy grows at fastest pace for more than two years - BBC News
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-08-2017, 06:10 PM
 
330 posts, read 177,608 times
Reputation: 168
Quote:
Originally Posted by FirebirdCamaro1220 View Post
Again, your answer is total social darwinism. That's not going to fly😒
Maybe we need a bit more of that and a lot less coddling the parasite class!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-08-2017, 06:12 PM
 
330 posts, read 177,608 times
Reputation: 168
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hoonose View Post
We basically direct the interest rates from the bottom via the Fed/Treasury. So rates there go up if and when they dictate. Benefits vs risks.

IMO we are in a low interest scenario short/medium term maybe longer. Maybe a bit up, not drastic to matter much. If push comes to shove down the road, first off we can issue more short term debt with lower rates.

And then we can use other means in the distant future.

http://www.nakedcapitalism.com/2017/...ual-bonds.html

If China Can Fund infrastructure with Its Own Credit, So Can We: Ellen Brown ~ Mike Norman Economics

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Trillion_dollar_coin

Issue money without associated debt.

All far off ideas, but potentially doable.

Japan is way far beyond us and doing well enough.

Japan's economy grows at fastest pace for more than two years - BBC News

Oh, the machinations you must go through to do the insane. Just get the feds out of this, once and for all, and let the market take care of delivering the very best service and the very lowest price. That's what they do, you know (or, perhaps, you don't).
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-08-2017, 06:29 PM
 
18,805 posts, read 8,479,367 times
Reputation: 4131
Quote:
Originally Posted by 10 2 4 View Post
Oh, the machinations you must go through to do the insane. Just get the feds out of this, once and for all, and let the market take care of delivering the very best service and the very lowest price. That's what they do, you know (or, perhaps, you don't).
Ain't gonna happen. In 100 years our HC spending alone will be more USD than in existence today. Our people will not go without care, so the money will be found/made.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-08-2017, 06:47 PM
 
330 posts, read 177,608 times
Reputation: 168
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hoonose View Post
Ain't gonna happen. In 100 years our HC spending alone will be more USD than in existence today. Our people will not go without care, so the money will be found/made.

Game, Set, Match.


We should just shut everything down, if HC is going to be an economic black-hole that sucks in all the value produced by the economy.


It is amazing that you still don't get it. You don't even seem to be able to see it.


ONLY market forces will drive costs down and quality up. OPM will do the opposite, until there is nothing left for food, or clothing or anything else.


My friend, you have slid down the slippery slope and crashed at the bottom. I'll put up a headstone for you!!!!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-08-2017, 06:50 PM
 
21,481 posts, read 10,585,771 times
Reputation: 14130
Quote:
Originally Posted by Finn_Jarber View Post
Which countries? South America? I believe that it true there.

I have also lived in single payer system. Pretty much everyone use it, except the very old who see doctors all the time. The elderly prefer private clinics. The young see a doctor every other year for physical, and don't care for any additional insurance, because they get all they need from the single payer.
And how many people lived in that country?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-08-2017, 07:15 PM
 
Location: Living rent free in your head
42,850 posts, read 26,301,017 times
Reputation: 34059
Quote:
Originally Posted by 10 2 4 View Post
Oh, the machinations you must go through to do the insane. Just get the feds out of this, once and for all, and let the market take care of delivering the very best service and the very lowest price. That's what they do, you know (or, perhaps, you don't).
The 'market' had a chance to deliver the best care at the lowest price since at least the 1920's what went wrong? And how many more chances do they need? The only competition in healthcare is for elective services like Lasik and cosmetic surgery and the prices have been stable or dropped when other prices were rising, but those are services people don't need to stay alive and they aren't typically covered by insurance, so the consumer has some power to keep prices down.

But there is no competition when your three year old is having an asthma attack, you take the child to the closest ER for treatment you don't do a google search to try to save money or walk out with a sick kid if you think it will cost too much to treat her. If you get cancer, you beg your doctor to send you to the best oncologist in the area, you don't bargain shop. Probably 70% of the public would go bankrupt trying to pay for chemo or an expensive surgery- that's why we have health insurance.

You tell me, how do you create competition in a market where the providers and the insurance companies hold all the cards and we have none?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 03:27 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top