Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Location: By the sea, by the sea, by the beautiful sea
68,330 posts, read 54,419,437 times
Reputation: 40736
Quote:
Originally Posted by DRob4JC
What we do have in this thread are investigations that found multiple instances of corruption that did not see the light of day.
Since those allegations of corruption have also included false statements like Moscow controlling a "large swath" of American uranium, why should their other claims be taken as fact?
Not that we all know this for a fact that she did, what about Trump?
He is lining his pockets, with his businesses directly profiting from his position, selling hats on line, using RNC money to only pay for lawyers to defend himself and dopey Jr. (I thought he was "really rich"). Are you going to call out Trump for this as well?
Sure I will. Its a stretch to try and compare selling hats to selling out our country for personal gain though.
Looks like there are some trying to discredit it as fake news. It is actually published by Hill which is not a right wing or a conspiracy paper. NYT published about these donations few years back. Hill article actually published some official documents. Not sure if it is ok to publish these links here. Last time when I posted a picture of Hollywood guy, I received a warning.
As it's a stretch to accuse anyone of selling out the country without having facts supporting the accusation.
Its also a stretch to accuse a sitting President of collusion with another foreign power without facts, but hey...
You are correct though. Until proven I guess its premature to say that HRC and her foundation made off very well during her SOS stint..
Location: By the sea, by the sea, by the beautiful sea
68,330 posts, read 54,419,437 times
Reputation: 40736
Quote:
Originally Posted by lisanicole1
Its also a stretch to accuse a sitting President of collusion with another foreign power without facts, but hey...
You are correct though. Until proven I guess its premature to say that HRC and her foundation made off very well during her SOS stint..
The cited article makes no sense claiming Moscow controlled a commodity when it could not be exported, puts the rest in question as far as I'm concerned.
And there's a big difference between investigating something to obtain facts and putting forth something as fact.
Location: By the sea, by the sea, by the beautiful sea
68,330 posts, read 54,419,437 times
Reputation: 40736
Quote:
Originally Posted by Atalanta
I think something even bigger will be coming out by the end of today.
Kim Jung Nut comes out of the bathtub and the world trembles!
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
