Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Think about the investigation, coverage, and media time spent on Trump, Russia, and the election - which was netted a big zero.
Now read this entire article about the evidence that the FBI had and held back from Congress - because there is so much there that I can't highlight all of it here.
This is the sleight of hand performed by the media and the government. Get everyone focused on A and B, while C, D, E, F, and G are illegal actions that are covered up because they are on the same team.
Before the Obama administration approved a controversial deal in 2010 giving Moscow control of a large swath of American uranium, the FBI had gathered substantial evidence that Russian nuclear industry officials were engaged in bribery, kickbacks, extortion and money laundering designed to grow Vladimir Putin's atomic energy business inside the United States, according to government documents and interviews.
...
They also obtained an eyewitness account - backed by documents - indicating Russian nuclear officials had routed millions of dollars to the U.S. designed to benefit former President Bill Clinton's charitable foundation during the time Secretary of State Hillary Clinton served on a government body that provided a favorable decision to Moscow, sources told The Hill.
The racketeering scheme was conducted "with the consent of higher level officials" in Russia who "shared the proceeds" from the kickbacks, one agent declared in an affidavit years later.
INFOwars broke all this over a year ago, during the campaign and everyone blew him off as fake news.
Think about the investigation, coverage, and media time spent on Trump, Russia, and the election - which was netted a big zero.
Now read this entire article about the evidence that the FBI had and held back from Congress - because there is so much there that I can't highlight all of it here.
This is the sleight of hand performed by the media and the government. Get everyone focused on A and B, while C, D, E, F, and G are illegal actions that are covered up because they are on the same team.
Before the Obama administration approved a controversial deal in 2010 giving Moscow control of a large swath of American uranium, the FBI had gathered substantial evidence that Russian nuclear industry officials were engaged in bribery, kickbacks, extortion and money laundering designed to grow Vladimir Putin's atomic energy business inside the United States, according to government documents and interviews.
...
They also obtained an eyewitness account - backed by documents - indicating Russian nuclear officials had routed millions of dollars to the U.S. designed to benefit former President Bill Clinton's charitable foundation during the time Secretary of State Hillary Clinton served on a government body that provided a favorable decision to Moscow, sources told The Hill.
The racketeering scheme was conducted "with the consent of higher level officials" in Russia who "shared the proceeds" from the kickbacks, one agent declared in an affidavit years later.
Thanks for starting this thread. Hannity has been on this since the Election, prior to it, and heavily back on July 31st 2017.
Until this Trump administration gets off their ass and does something about it, it means absolutely nothing.
DM me when this thread or one like it becomes a sticky.
Quote:
Originally Posted by burdell
Quote:
Originally Posted by burdell
Quote:
Originally Posted by burdell
So, ya got nothing, eh?
"Large swath"? Yeah, that sounds like a real serious, accurate article, right?
And I'll ask again, HOW did Moscow control American uranium with no license to export it?
Blah, blah, blah..............................
Now show evidence those involved held an export license for that uranium or explain just how Moscow "controlled a large swath(a nebulous B.S. term if there ever was one)" of that uranium without the existence of that license?
Well then you're off the list for the unobtainium we'll be bringing in soon.
I did, but I also read "Its also a stretch to accuse a sitting President of collusion with another foreign power without facts," which begged the question how would you acquire facts without an investigation?
Exactly what's being done. Mueller apparently saw enough to justify an investigation, I remember enough about Nixon to believe position shouldn't preclude an investigation for cause.
The cited article makes no sense claiming Moscow controlled a commodity when it could not be exported, puts the rest in question as far as I'm concerned.
And there's a big difference between investigating something to obtain facts and putting forth something as fact.
As it's a stretch to accuse anyone of selling out the country without having facts supporting the accusation.
Since those allegations of corruption have also included false statements like Moscow controlling a "large swath" of American uranium, why should their other claims be taken as fact?
And you'd expect evidence to be found or charges to be filed without investigation?
How would that be done?
Ouija Board?
Tea Leaves?
Tarot?
Please, give some examples of evidence found/charges filed without investigations.
Or, have nothing factual supporting peoples' inane, baseless claims about you.
And when you post something, it doesn't mean it ever happened. Have anything factual proving illegal exportation ever took place or just blowing smoke?
Quote:
Originally Posted by DRob4JC
When you are the enforcer of the rules and laws, you don't need a license to do anything. Doesn't mean that it's legal... but hey pay a little extra kickback here and there - who needs a license.
Between 2009 and January 2012, Mikerin "did knowingly and willfully combine, conspire confederate and agree with other persons ... to obstruct, delay and affect commerce and the movement of an article and commodity (enriched uranium) in commerce by extortion," a November 2014 indictment stated.
His illegal conduct was captured with the help of a confidential witness, an American businessman, who began making kickback payments at Mikerin's direction and with the permission of the FBI. The first kickback payment recorded by the FBI through its informant was dated Nov. 27, 2009, the records show.
If you think uranium can be exported without a license it explains a lot about why you're so in the dark on this topic.
And WHERE is the evidence "a controversial deal in 2010 giving Moscow control of a large swath of American uranium" was ever made? Moscow did purchase a 20% stake in a Canadian mining company but WHERE is the evidence it gained control of "a large swath" (and, just WHAT the hell constitutes a "large swath"?) of American uranium?
This isn't a theory.
It happened. Rosenstein handled the investigation, Mueller covered it all up and Comey was the one that delivered the samples to Russia.
Solid proof of bribery, extortion, money laudering and collusion.
Russia had more to gain, had Hillary became President.
Now you have a witch hunt going after Trump, to cover all this up by the main players of the Uranium One deal.
Nothing like a youtube video to make your case, do you have any credible reporting on this. Too many people take Sean Hannity seriously, you really need some better sources.
Please, not the Uranium deal again, hasn't this been beaten to death. So the FBI suspected a Russian bribery plot and found no one so it must of course be a conspiracy. This is what passes as investigative reporting on Hannity, did anyone notice all the facts missing in this report?
Quote:
He said that in 2009, the FBI found evidence of a Russian bribery plot prior to Clinton's Uranium One deal.
In 2010, Clinton signed off on the deal and Vladimir Putin gained control of 20 percent of America's uranium.
Hannity said that five years later, only one person, a Russian citizen, was charged by the feds for their participation in the bribery scheme
Infowars is fake news, and the sale of the company was not some kind if deviant plot. This has been debunked before, yet you are pushing it again.
It reflects poorly on Hannity that he stoops to this drivel, but that is standard procedure for him.
So Hannity is just rerunning an INFOwars piece?
Attorney Gregg Jarrett is calling on Robert Mueller and Rod Rosenstein to resign from the investigation into Russian collusion with the Trump administration having themselves been complicit in Russian collusion by approving the sale of 20% of US uranium reserves to Russia.
Mueller and Rosenstein were on the CFIUS committee that approved the sale despite knowing that, as The Hill reported, “Russian nuclear officials were engaged in a racketeering scheme involving bribes, kickbacks and money laundering,” that also ensnared the Clinton Foundation.
Hillary was also on the committee that rubber stamped the deal while her husband was receiving huge speaking fees from Russian officials as millions in “charitable donations” poured into the coffers of the Clinton Foundation from Russia.
Infowars is fake news, and the sale of the company was not some kind if deviant plot. This has been debunked before, yet you are pushing it again.
It reflects poorly on Hannity that he stoops to this drivel, but that is standard procedure for him.
Because the guy inside the FBI, that has been under a gag order by the FBI, is now able to talk.
Snowden broke all this and it was covered up.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
