Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
"I was escorted through the modest single-story cinderblock think tank by IPS senior fellow Dr. Julie DeVine, a futurist trained at MIT, the Minnesota Institute of Titology, which has a controversial doctoral program.
As Dr. DeVine led me to the Future wing of the institute, I couldn't help but notice that she is an extremely attractive blonde with a tight, round ass, legs that won't quit and firm but ample breasts. So ample, in fact, that she received a full scholarship from MIT.
At first, I thought it was my imagination, but when Dr. DeVine escorted me into the virtual reality room, she seemed to be coming on to me. She allowed her bodacious breasts to brush against my face as she lowered me into the prototype of the Virtu-Screw 2000. "How does that feel?" she cooed. I didn't know if she was referring to the Naugahyde bucket seat or to the two erect nipples pushing through her white lab coat and nearly poking my eyes out.
Then Dr. DeVine placed the Virtu-Screw helmet over my head. Sitting in the pitch dark, I felt slightly vulnerable but also excited. She asked me which setting I wanted. Since I've been married 23 years, I naturally chose "blow job." My chair was abruptly tilted backward and I "felt" my pants being unzipped. If I hadn't known I was sitting in the most state-of-the-art virtual reality sex machine, I would've sworn that a real woman's hand had pulled my **** from my pants.
My nervousness disappeared, and I sat back and enjoyed the amazingly realistic cyber job. It was every bit as good as the last real blow job I had gotten 23 years earlier — if not better — because when I shot my wad, the virtual mouth swallowed. ...
Virtual reality sex, Dr. DeVine fears, will become the crack cocaine of the 21st century. Why then was she contributing to the VRS project? She explained that if the U.S. didn't develop the technology first, someone else would, and she shuddered just thinking of VRS in the hands of the Chinese.
I found myself extremely attracted to the vulnerable side of this sexy scientist, and when I offered to comfort her, she accepted, kissing me full on the lips and inserting her tongue into my mouth and moving it around suggestively. Then she reached down and started rubbing my crotch and within just five or ten minutes, my **** was again hard and ready for action. ...
While still rubbing my crotch, Dr. DeVine led me through the Future wing to the Sexbot room. ...
The most current Sexbot prototype, Connie, while quite attractive, has moving parts made of plastic and metal alloys considered quite dangerous. In fact, as a futurist, Dr. DeVine believes that the first Sexbots to hit the market will result in class-action suits filed by severely injured men.
That's why Dr. DeVine urged me to forgo Connie and introduced me to Wilhelmina, a beautiful young German-born researcher who, while human, most closely approximates the Sexbot of the 22nd century. Wilhelmina escorted me to a private room with a bed and removed her clothes. If this is what Sexbots will look like a hundred years from now, I envy my great-great-grandsons. We made passionate love for two or three minutes before being joined by Dr. DeVine, who wanted to make the point that Sexbots will be used for threesomes.
I could describe the incredible sex the three of us had, but this is a piece of journalism about the future of pornography and not one of those cheesy letters from a horny reader. Suffice it to say that everyone came several times, except me, who came only once. ...
As I thanked Dr. DeVine, she again rubbed my crotch and asked me to tell readers tours of the institute are available for $500."
I don't think anyone has any doubt that the timing of reports of Moore's actions from 30 years ago were timed to disrupt the election. They could have been reported by the accuser's mother when they happened. Or any time when he was in line to become a judge. Or after he was seated. Or during the primary process. No-the info was brought out a few weeks before one of the most important Senate special elections in history. In a timeframe when it was virtually impossible for the Republican party to pull their nomination and have time to place someone else in that position (if it were even possible without a new primary). Seems obvious to anyone with a brain that this was orchestrated to happen at a time when it could do the maximum possible damage with little recourse. All the accusations may be revealed as fabrications today (or not), the yearbook signature might be exposed as counterfeit-doesn't matter. A Democrat, who had no chance in winning in a fair, balanced election, is now senator, and Moore's reputation is trashed.
Now-it seems pretty likely that the Franken "resignation movement" was a stage show again orchastrated to make it look like the Dems were on some moral high ground by calling for his resignation. If they encouraged him to step down-how could the Rs not do the same with Moore without a double standard?
So the question-now that the election is over...will the pressure remain on Franken to do the honorable thing and resign? Will the press continue to publish the stories of his harassment of women? Will the women in leadership positions express outrage and demand that this "abuser" resigns? Or will all of that suddenly die down? Will Franken's accusers just quietly go away? Was it all just a big show?
I'm already seeing posts by leftist friends on Facebook saying what a great guy and supporter of women Franken is. How what he did wasn't so bad, and how he deserves a second (3rd, 4th, 5th?) chance. About how his position shouldn't be given up...anymore.
MN governor has already appointed a replacement for Al Franken.
I don't think anyone has any doubt that the timing of reports of Moore's actions from 30 years ago were timed to disrupt the election. They could have been reported by the accuser's mother when they happened. Or any time when he was in line to become a judge. Or after he was seated. Or during the primary process. No-the info was brought out a few weeks before one of the most important Senate special elections in history. In a timeframe when it was virtually impossible for the Republican party to pull their nomination and have time to place someone else in that position (if it were even possible without a new primary). Seems obvious to anyone with a brain that this was orchestrated to happen at a time when it could do the maximum possible damage with little recourse. All the accusations may be revealed as fabrications today (or not), the yearbook signature might be exposed as counterfeit-doesn't matter. A Democrat, who had no chance in winning in a fair, balanced election, is now senator, and Moore's reputation is trashed.
Now-it seems pretty likely that the Franken "resignation movement" was a stage show again orchastrated to make it look like the Dems were on some moral high ground by calling for his resignation. If they encouraged him to step down-how could the Rs not do the same with Moore without a double standard?
So the question-now that the election is over...will the pressure remain on Franken to do the honorable thing and resign? Will the press continue to publish the stories of his harassment of women? Will the women in leadership positions express outrage and demand that this "abuser" resigns? Or will all of that suddenly die down? Will Franken's accusers just quietly go away? Was it all just a big show?
I'm already seeing posts by leftist friends on Facebook saying what a great guy and supporter of women Franken is. How what he did wasn't so bad, and how he deserves a second (3rd, 4th, 5th?) chance. About how his position shouldn't be given up...anymore.
His tribe's press will build him back up to model citizen and that will be that.
For a seat that's not yet open. Not hard to understand.
Franken is finished as a senator, at least for now. I could see him coming back in some future election (maybe go to "sex camp" or something for rehab) if nothing else turns up on him.
Ah, yes. Revenge is a dish best served cold. Get over it cupcake. What Franken did was not even in the same ballpark as that sick child molester that the GOP tried to put in office. Franken will be forgiven in time, but Moore will burn in political hell along with the rest of the GOP that thinks what he did is OK.
... lets correct the record....
what franken did was not even in the same ballpark as the sick child molester allegations that have not been substantiated... that derailed the GOP nominee....
the voters are spoken and republicans did what republicans have done most of the time when one of their own runs for office... they rejected him.
im good with that. but YOU aren't being honest when you flat say the guy was a child molester. We don't know. There is zero evidence beyond the accusations of a woman 40 years after the fact. One thing we do know, is another young but of age woman accused the man of sexual assault. She provided some evidence. Then when asked to produce the evidence for independent verification, she refused.
Further, you are utterly lying when you suggest the "GOP tried to put Moore in office". The GOP did everything it could to insure his defeat once the allegations were made.
I don't mind a vigorous debate but shouldn't we have some kind construct that requires we discuss based on actually reality? do you care about reality?
His tribe's press will build him back up to model citizen and that will be that.
That is what I am concerned about-and again, if current social media posts are any indication, it's underway.
Honestly though, I can't believe it would really happen and that Franken would "change his mind". That would reveal both him and the entire Democratic leadership as nothing but liars and hypocrites to be held up and mocked for everyone. The media would be all over that and would call them out, putting it on the top of the news cycle 24/7-just as they did with Moore and have been doing with Trump.
Oh, wait....I FORGOT-Franken's a Dem. If he changes his mind...the media won't even mention it, or will make a point to promote what a great guy and supporter of feminism he actually is!
I might be wrong-and hope that I am and that both the DNC and the MSM has some shread of integrity left. Anyone feel like betting on that one?
Franken is finished as a senator, at least for now. I could see him coming back in some future election (maybe go to "sex camp" or something for rehab) if nothing else turns up on him.
it aint over yet and even the linked article that says he is done, suggests some dems are thinking twice.
I don't think anyone has any doubt that the timing of reports of Moore's actions from 30 years ago were timed to disrupt the election.
Seriously get over it. Are you going to act like Hillary and her supporters who still can't get over losing? Moore was his own worst enemy including how he acted more than 30 years ago. A better man with less skeletons would have survived it. Moore was not that person.
Maybe Moore will write a book like Hillary did and you can buy that to sooth your pain.
Regarding Franken. My hunch is he will leave office. His party has shown him the door and he agreed to walk through it. But I could be wrong.
I don't think anyone has any doubt that the timing of reports of Moore's actions from 30 years ago were timed to disrupt the election. They could have been reported by the accuser's mother when they happened. Or any time when he was in line to become a judge. Or after he was seated. Or during the primary process. No-the info was brought out a few weeks before one of the most important Senate special elections in history. In a timeframe when it was virtually impossible for the Republican party to pull their nomination and have time to place someone else in that position (if it were even possible without a new primary). Seems obvious to anyone with a brain that this was orchestrated to happen at a time when it could do the maximum possible damage with little recourse. All the accusations may be revealed as fabrications today (or not), the yearbook signature might be exposed as counterfeit-doesn't matter. A Democrat, who had no chance in winning in a fair, balanced election, is now senator, and Moore's reputation is trashed.
Now-it seems pretty likely that the Franken "resignation movement" was a stage show again orchastrated to make it look like the Dems were on some moral high ground by calling for his resignation. If they encouraged him to step down-how could the Rs not do the same with Moore without a double standard?
So the question-now that the election is over...will the pressure remain on Franken to do the honorable thing and resign? Will the press continue to publish the stories of his harassment of women? Will the women in leadership positions express outrage and demand that this "abuser" resigns? Or will all of that suddenly die down? Will Franken's accusers just quietly go away? Was it all just a big show?
I'm already seeing posts by leftist friends on Facebook saying what a great guy and supporter of women Franken is. How what he did wasn't so bad, and how he deserves a second (3rd, 4th, 5th?) chance. About how his position shouldn't be given up...anymore.
oh I'm piling.
HE RESIGNED LAST WEEK.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
