Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 03-07-2018, 10:53 AM
 
Location: Madison, WI
5,302 posts, read 2,356,621 times
Reputation: 1230

Advertisements

The problem is, you can create jobs and still hurt the economy as a whole. I don't think adding some aluminum jobs in Kentucky outweighs aluminum prices going up for everyone here.

If you want to take it to its logical conclusion, why wouldn't it benefit a single state, or city, or family, or individual to produce their own aluminum? They're creating jobs for themselves...

The problem is that it would cost more, so it's a net negative. If companies in other states can produce aluminum more cheaply than one here in Wisconsin, we could put tariffs on aluminum and that would create jobs here....but why do that? Same applies to countries.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 03-07-2018, 10:57 AM
 
Location: Kansas City, MISSOURI
20,873 posts, read 9,546,294 times
Reputation: 15598
^
Good point. The logic of the OP and others supporting the tariffs amounts to saying that raising prices is good. Why don't we raise the tariffs to, say, 500%? Surely that will create lots of jobs in the steel industry! Too bad it would kill a whole lot of steel consumers.

OP doesn't realize this, but it is likely to send some manufacturing jobs overseas. Some manufacturers will decide it's cheaper to make something in another country and export it here than to pay ridiculous prices for steel.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-07-2018, 11:07 AM
 
3,992 posts, read 2,460,058 times
Reputation: 2350
Quote:
Originally Posted by OnOurWayHome View Post
Also bad for all the industries that use imported steel, like the auto industry. A lot more people work there than in steel.

Also, we get more steel from Canada and Mexico than from China.
why worry about facts I guess ,right? lol
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-07-2018, 11:17 AM
 
35,309 posts, read 52,323,443 times
Reputation: 30999
Quote:
Originally Posted by WaldoKitty View Post
Nope. The announcements are real.
The announcements you speak of are pure speculation made to sound good to trump cultists, there are at the moment no new jobs or aluminum factories just one guy on FOX making the claim.
These tariffs are only going to drive up the cost of imports to overcome these tariffs, everything made of steel or aluminum will cost more and then theres the retaliatory nature of protectionism. these tariffs are a really dumb idea.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-07-2018, 11:20 AM
 
Location: Pacific Northwest
3,845 posts, read 1,789,905 times
Reputation: 5028
Quote:
Originally Posted by LINative View Post
I don't think it will be that bad for steel consumers either. Production will shift back to the United States or to those countries that the USA does not have a tariff with - that is why countries like the EU are threatening tariffs themselves, this is all part of a negotiating process so eventually they don't have a tariff put on them. But the Europeans are not the main ones dumping steel and aluminum on the World market so a deal can be worked out with the USA.

Prices will come down. In order for a steel plant to make it in Pennsylvania, Illinois, Indiana, Ohio, Alabama etc., it still needs to be cost competitive and they will do it by using new technology and automation. Automation will provide less jobs then in the past but it still better for the USA to have say 300 jobs in Kentucky than 1,000 jobs somewhere in Asia.
I agree. I believe overall this will strengthen our steel and aluminum industry and be better for both consumers and producers.

And give credit where its due, Trump wanted to bring back manufacturing jobs at least he is making an effort. I do not support Trump on many of his policies and ideas, but this is one of the few things we should support.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-07-2018, 11:21 AM
 
Location: SC
8,793 posts, read 8,168,172 times
Reputation: 12992
So trump announces that he is going to add tariffs and within days a manufacturer adds 300 new jobs without waiting for it to be finalized? Sounds pretty stupid and/or premature to me.

Last edited by blktoptrvl; 03-07-2018 at 11:30 AM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-07-2018, 11:32 AM
 
Location: NC
11,222 posts, read 8,307,135 times
Reputation: 12469
Quote:
Originally Posted by WaldoKitty View Post
Following new jobs coming to Tennessee due to LG announcing a new Washing Machine plant in Tenn, now USA AL manufacture announces 300 new jobs coming to Kentucky. Average salary is $90K

These are due to Trump's tariffs.

They work.


https://www.youtube.com/watch?time_c...&v=OIU-pZ3NMdM


Still Winning

#MAGA
Quote:
Originally Posted by WaldoKitty View Post
Would that be because it proves that Trump's tariffs are immediately working?
Quote:
Originally Posted by jambo101 View Post
Fake news
It actually IS fake news! While Trump did announce his ill-conceived plans to start a trade-war, the tariffs have not gone into effect, and in fact, he has not yet signed the order yet, so it truly is FAKE NEWS. Waldo Kitty screams fake news about everything, only to be proven time and time again that she is wrong (by someone posting video evidence), but here she is posting fake news herself. Too ironic.

And to put a point on how rediculous this claim is: It assumes that companies are investing millions (if not billions) to build new plants and reopen old ones, based on a statement from the President who is known to flip-flop based on the highest bidder. Just from a due-diligence point of view, they are not going to build plants based on something he says he'll do, especially something that is illegal in WTO rulings, and highly subject to being overruled or overturned, or influenced due to reciprocation.

In a word, NO BUSINESS PERSON in their right mind is making decisions based on this unfulfilled statement. PERHAPS they are using the opportunity to make press releases about plans already in the works, but the thought that they are investing billions based on a single statement is well beyond laughable.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-07-2018, 11:34 AM
 
Location: Vancouver
18,504 posts, read 15,564,431 times
Reputation: 11937
Quote:
Originally Posted by skeddy View Post
Trump is using this to get a better trade deal with mexico and canada. He's 2 steps ahead of the liberal media. They'll never catch up, they aren't smart enough to figure it out.
Don't what media you are reading, but it's all over the news.

First off, it's a non-starter. Canada has said as much. Trump can threaten all he wants, but the tariffs will not be used as a bargaining chip in the NAFTA talks.

What Canada has said, and WILL do is retaliate against the US. It also won't be just Canada.

Nobody wins.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-07-2018, 12:15 PM
 
Location: On the Great South Bay
9,173 posts, read 13,256,248 times
Reputation: 10145
Quote:
Originally Posted by blktoptrvl View Post
So trump announces that he is going to add tariffs and within days a manufacturer adds 300 new jobs without waiting for it to be finalized? Sounds pretty stupid and/or premature to me.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Natnasci View Post
Don't what media you are reading, but it's all over the news.

First off, it's a non-starter. Canada has said as much. Trump can threaten all he wants, but the tariffs will not be used as a bargaining chip in the NAFTA talks.

What Canada has said, and WILL do is retaliate against the US. It also won't be just Canada.

Nobody wins.
That is a decent point Blktop. Lots of people getting numbers out of the blue to sway public opinion.

Natnasci, all sides are trying to maximize their negotiating position here. The reality for Canada is that the USA is the best option, with the possible exception of the EU. With the USA, Canadian businesses gets access to a nearby market of 320 million people while only offering a market of 37 million in return. And the EU? After negotiating with the USA, I think they will follow and work with the USA in order to save their own steel and aluminum industries. They have the same problem with the dumping of steel and aluminum that the US has.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-07-2018, 01:53 PM
 
29,505 posts, read 14,663,209 times
Reputation: 14458
Quote:
Originally Posted by legalsea View Post
I assume, at the least, the Japanese. I never touch bourbon. Nasty stuff.


Anyway, give an example of what a shot of good bourbon in the US costs, and what the same shot costs in Europe. I would be interested to know.

Here was something I found quickly. It was a UK only released bottle of Blanton's. It sold in the UK for $75 US. A regular off the shelf bottle of Blanton's , at least here in Michigan is roughly $69.
Funny thing is collectors where buying the UK bottle and shipping it back for an added cost of $30. Crazy.


https://www.straightbourbon.com/comm...blantons-sftb/
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 09:53 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top