Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
View Poll Results: Modify indoor smoking ban? Please read post before answering.
Modify indoor smoking ban to let bar owners (adult-only bars) decide AND institute outdoor ban to protect shared airspace. 33 50.00%
Keep indoor ban as is and add outdoor ban. 12 18.18%
Keep indoor ban, add outdoor ban, and add ban on smoking in private residences and cars when children are present. 21 31.82%
Voters: 66. You may not vote on this poll

Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 03-29-2018, 05:24 PM
 
7,293 posts, read 4,101,759 times
Reputation: 4675

Advertisements

Now that smokers have been pushed outside by the indoor smoking ban, thus creating a new perceived hazard in shared airspace, AND most affected tavern owners haven't suffered financial losses as a result of banning smoking, could you support a modification to the ban on indoor smoking to allow tavern owners to decide?

At this point, only a small percentage of such businesses would go back.

I am not talking about any other type of business. Only adult businesses, like taverns, bars, etc. And they would have to display proper warning signage on the front door.

Last edited by AguaDulce; 03-29-2018 at 05:33 PM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 03-29-2018, 05:27 PM
 
34,279 posts, read 19,397,951 times
Reputation: 17261
No. No poll up yet for me to reply too though.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-29-2018, 05:29 PM
 
Location: Santa Monica
36,853 posts, read 17,391,106 times
Reputation: 14459
Each individual can decide if they will allow a smoker on their private property.

They can also decide if they want a Christian, an Asian man, or a transgendered little person on their property.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-29-2018, 05:29 PM
 
Location: Colorado
923 posts, read 495,942 times
Reputation: 1283
Indoor smoking could work, but not by simple segregation. If they put an airlock in place between the areas it could work. Having a no-smoking area adjacent to a smoking area is like having a no-peeing area in a pool. Air curtains could work for this as well.

Last edited by TheBaldBlur; 03-29-2018 at 05:41 PM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-29-2018, 05:37 PM
 
7,293 posts, read 4,101,759 times
Reputation: 4675
Quote:
Originally Posted by greywar View Post
No. No poll up yet for me to reply too though.
I was having trouble figuring out how to create the poll. It's up now.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-29-2018, 05:39 PM
 
7,293 posts, read 4,101,759 times
Reputation: 4675
Quote:
Originally Posted by No_Recess View Post
Each individual can decide if they will allow a smoker on their private property.

They can also decide if they want a Christian, an Asian man, or a transgendered little person on their property.
Ha!

Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-29-2018, 05:39 PM
 
34,279 posts, read 19,397,951 times
Reputation: 17261
Quote:
Originally Posted by AguaDulce View Post
I was having trouble figuring out how to create the poll. It's up now.
Sadly no "I like it just the way it is" option.

The indoor ban is there for a reason, there is no point dredging all of this up any more. And I have no desire to add more to it. This is working.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-29-2018, 05:40 PM
 
Location: Central Mexico and Central Florida
7,150 posts, read 4,912,529 times
Reputation: 10444
They tried various ways to segregate smoking v. non-smoking areas within bars/restaurants and they never worked. The current indoor ban works. Why change it??

Outdoor ban should be implemented where food is sold, including at bars that serve food.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-29-2018, 05:42 PM
 
Location: San Diego
50,371 posts, read 47,120,861 times
Reputation: 34107
Too much big Govt. Let the owners decide. Those that don't smoke, which is most, won't go there.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-29-2018, 05:42 PM
 
7,293 posts, read 4,101,759 times
Reputation: 4675
Quote:
Originally Posted by TheBaldBlur View Post
Indoor smoking could work, but not by simple segregation. If they put a airlock in place between the areas it could work. Having a no-smoking area adjacent to a smoking area is like having a no-peeing area in a pool. Air curtains could work for this as well.
I'm talking about a bar that is for adults only and permits smoking on the entire premises.

It's hard to come up with a poll that covers everything. Next time I'll spend more time thinking about all of the possible answers. This is new to me.

Thanks for replying!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top