Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 05-20-2018, 05:52 PM
 
Location: Philaburbia
41,957 posts, read 75,183,468 times
Reputation: 66918

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by NeutralParty View Post
I'm pro-life, but hasn't it been a known fact for years that federal funds have never gone towards abortions at planned parenthood and other clinics for women?

Federal funding only goes towards STD tests, birth control, etc. Not abortions.
Apparently it's not as well known as you'd think, because some people refuse to believe facts if those facts don't suit their agendas.

Quote:
Originally Posted by janelle144 View Post
"The rule announced today is legally appropriate, because it acts on the statutory language that prohibits Title X funds from supporting abortion.
Wrong!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 05-20-2018, 05:52 PM
 
Location: Midwest
38,496 posts, read 25,811,747 times
Reputation: 10789
Quote:
Originally Posted by janelle144 View Post
Are you saying Dems don't want to help the woman after the baby is born----that is what you are saying, you know. They just want poor women to go get an abortion. Problem taken care of----just kill the baby.
No, we are saying Republicans don't want to help the woman, or her baby, after the baby is born. How has the GOP dominated Iowa increased funds for single parents due to their new heartbeat bill? What is being proposed on a federal level to help single mothers after PP funding is stopped? What have you done?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-20-2018, 05:55 PM
 
Location: Long Island
57,271 posts, read 26,199,434 times
Reputation: 15639
Quote:
Originally Posted by janelle144 View Post
"The rule announced today is legally appropriate, because it acts on the statutory language that prohibits Title X funds from supporting abortion. It is constitutionally sound, as the Supreme Court ruled in Rust v. Sullivan. And it is morally right, because it curtails the use of taxpayer dollars to support a practice that many millions of taxpayers rightly regard as brutal and unconscionable—a taking of innocent human life, and so a grave, avoidable injustice and a stain upon the nation’s moral character.
This is just a modest step in the right direction on federal abortion policy, but every step counts."


https://www.nationalreview.com/corne...pro-life-step/
This bill has nothing to do with abortion funding which is already prohibited and already audited, this is an obvious attempt to close abortion clinics and it will fail in the courts.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-20-2018, 08:05 PM
 
23,654 posts, read 17,508,893 times
Reputation: 7472
https://www.liveaction.org/news/man-...-looking-mama/


"Abortion clinic manager turned pro-lifer Abby Johnson once described a conversation she and the workers at her abortion facility had about Hern. Johnson said her boss at the time said the babies aborted by Hern are so large, “they come out crying and looking for their mama.”


I don't know why all abortion workers don't turn pro-life with what they witness.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-20-2018, 09:03 PM
 
Location: Philaburbia
41,957 posts, read 75,183,468 times
Reputation: 66918
You can't stick to the topic in your own thread, can you? :Smack:
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-20-2018, 10:49 PM
 
Location: Stillwater, Oklahoma
30,976 posts, read 21,633,814 times
Reputation: 9676
Quote:
Originally Posted by janelle144 View Post
Are you saying Dems don't want to help the woman after the baby is born----that is what you are saying, you know. They just want poor women to go get an abortion. Problem taken care of----just kill the baby.

Then what laws do you want put in place that will assure that every pregnancy woman will give birth, or else face serious consequences?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-20-2018, 10:54 PM
 
Location: Stillwater, Oklahoma
30,976 posts, read 21,633,814 times
Reputation: 9676
Quote:
Originally Posted by saltine View Post
You obviously couldn’t control yourself. Next
What a disgusting, thoughtless thing to say to her.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-20-2018, 10:58 PM
 
Location: Stillwater, Oklahoma
30,976 posts, read 21,633,814 times
Reputation: 9676
Quote:
Originally Posted by InformedConsent View Post
Last time I checked, several religions prohibited murder
But the Bible, which is used by many Christian religions, does not ban a woman from getting an abortion.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-20-2018, 10:59 PM
 
Location: El paso,tx
4,514 posts, read 2,523,008 times
Reputation: 8200
Quote:
Originally Posted by dothetwist View Post
Keep religion OUT of government and out of a woman's right to choose.
Sure...then don't rely on our money funding abortions...PP shouldn't get taxpayer money to perform abortions. And of course they can say theydon't, but if you give them money, it does let them do so...pretty easy to just move money around to show it spent where it should be, and sell aborted baby parts to supplement income. So the abortions let them make a profit.
PP doesn't perform mammograms...
https://www.factcheck.org/2012/10/pl...nd-mammograms/

IF they wanted, they could provide every other service, like std screenings, birth control, pap smears,prenatal care and not abortions and have the govt fund them...if they thought those services were important. They don't think they are that important...abortions allow them to sell baby parts, and make a profit...have you seen their payroll of their execs???

Last edited by Spottednikes; 05-20-2018 at 11:09 PM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-20-2018, 11:05 PM
 
Location: Stillwater, Oklahoma
30,976 posts, read 21,633,814 times
Reputation: 9676
Quote:
Originally Posted by InformedConsent View Post
Where? PP doesn't provide prenatal care. Do you really expect anyone to believe PP will let a cash cow (sorry, I know that's offensive but it makes a very clear point) walk out of their facility and spend those healthcare $$$ elsewhere?
Like it or not, some Planned Parenthood centers offer prenatal care.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top