Judge Kavanaugh hearings and allegations MERGED (FBI, death, Clinton, Kennedy)

[itshim]

Originally Posted by moneill

The Republican Senate does NOT want anyone talking to Mark Judge. They DESPERATELY do not want the FBI talking to him and we all know why.

THe FBI conducted 6 investigations into Kavanaugh.

What Republicans don't want is redundant investigation used to obstruct the selection process.

Why not file a police report? We all know why she wont....

[Rachel976]

Originally Posted by GotHereQuickAsICould

You were banned from this forum?

You've posted dozens of times the last few days.

NO. I said a forum moderated by an extreme liberal. Clearly I am not talking about this site. This site - thank you moderators! - allows a full and fair debate.

[RedZin]

Originally Posted by MJJersey

He replaced Scalia. It was not a big deal in terms of ideological shift on the Court. Replacing Kennedy is Huge.

Remind me again why we want the court shifted hard right? Is that an way to represent the country?

ALL OF THE COUNTRY?

Or just the uberconservatives and Fox News fans?

I genuinely do want to know.

Roberts was a conservative. I would like him replaced by a conservative, as that keeps the court balanced.

But, why not a conservative more in the vein of Roberts? We have those. They do exist.

[Dbones]

Originally Posted by Nanny Goat

Why women wait? For one reason, look at what's happened to Ford.

What happened to her is due to the fact that she did wait duh.

[Enigma777]

Originally Posted by neko_mimi

I #BelieveHer. What about you, dems?

Sorry-this woman signed an affidavit recanting her accusation. I'll go with the legal document.

[Ringo1]

Originally Posted by southbel

You're hilarious. You're trying to act that sincere on this? You know why. Because Gorsuch didn't change the composition of the court and Kavanaugh does. Wouldn't have mattered who was nominated - this same circus would have occurred because the Democrats wanted to win no matter what damage they caused or delay no matter what damage they caused.

You're never ever going to admit that but you know it's the truth.

Plus, Bart O'Kavanaugh has now proven himself to be a partisan hack. Yesterday, we saw behind the mask.

And it was a raging, unstable, man blaming Hillary Clinton for his behavior back in the 80's and 90's.

[i_love_autumn]

Originally Posted by i_love_autumn

He is a KNOWN PERJURER, and he told several MORE lies in this hearing!
Kavanaugh vs. Kavanaugh: Supreme Court nominee has offered conflicting accounts of his teenage drinking
Unfortunately for Kavanaugh, both versions — one of a hard-partying, heavy-drinking frat boy and the other of a church-going athlete known from age 14 for respecting women’s dignity — come from Kavanaugh’s own words.
Maryland raised its drinking age from 18 to 21 in 1982, when Kavanaugh was 17. (So he was drinking illegally even if the legal age was still 18,which it wasn't, and he is lying!)
Kavanaugh vs. Kavanaugh: Supreme Court nominee has offered conflicting accounts of his teenage drinking - Los Angeles Times

I just called MSNBC and CNN ,had to leave a message, but I asked why they are allowing Kavanaugh to get away with this lie'COMMITTING PERJURY'!

[Wapasha]

Originally Posted by moneill

Going back 50 years to justify inappropriate procedures now is lazy and ineffectual in my opinion.

I wonder if we had social media, the media were more aggressive etc...back then if Kennedy would have been able to brush that horrible incident off.

Kennedy was celebrated as the Lion of the Senate nine years ago, not fifty.

The point is, we all know Kennedy was responsible for the death of a woman, and yet Kavanaugh is not guilty of any crimes.

[southbel]

Originally Posted by RedZin

Remind me again why we want the court shifted hard right? Is that an way to represent the country?

ALL OF THE COUNTRY?

Or just the uberconservatives and Fox News fans?

I genuinely do want to know.

Roberts was a conservative. I would like him replaced by a conservative, as that keeps the court balanced.

But, why not a conservative more in the vein of Roberts? We have those. They do exist.

Because elections have consequences. If Hillary had won, she would have put in hard left justices.

[RedZin]

Originally Posted by chucksnee

Don't know what you're looking at...but what I'm seeing is the left using another woman....and you are right....women are going to flock, but not in the way you think, not even close....

If you think the majority of women are going to hurry out and vote Republican after this fiasco, I recommend you frequent more places than conservative internet comments sections and the early bird specials at Denny's.