Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Second part is partly correct, actually what happened is that he left the door ajar according to her statement. So, she did not try to use the key according to her statement. Highly skeptical of anything she is saying about this. Seems like open and shut first degree manslaughter at minimum. But I am sure they are looking for other motivations. Did she have some sort of previous argument with this neighbor for instance?
She was in uniform, I doubt she went out to a bar and got plastered in uniform. She did work a 15 hr shift, which is crazy. That level of exhaustion could be just as disorienting as being drunk and that is what she can use as a defense regardless of what really happened that night. Why did they have her working so many hours in a job where she needs to be alert.
If, in fact, they determine that the basic cause of the shooting was overwork, then the result should be a change in department workload policy.
Unfortunately, police departments don't seem to work that way. When they can doff off a civilian shooting as something other than individual officer negligence or malfeasance (which is almost always), it seems like they never take a look at the training or polices that led to it. Their attitude is just, "Oh, well."
She was in uniform, I doubt she went out to a bar and got plastered inuniform. She did work a 15 hr shift, which is crazy. That level of exhaustion could be just as disorienting as being drunk and that is what she can use as a defense regardless of what really happened that night. Why did they have her working so many hours in a job where she needs to be alert.
Why don't they release the results of her blood test? And no matter what the result is it would put to rest the belief that the department is stonewalling. That maybe they're hiding something.
On another thread in a different forum on which this incident was mentioned, someone claimed they read an article stating that two witnesses living in the same complex overheard her saying, "Let me in!" to the victim. Has anyone else read this? I was unable to find an article to corroborate that. If it's true, though, then, well, this had to be more than manslaughter.
I read that but didn't know if it was true.
Door ajar...you guys see all the videos of people living in that complex showing you all the doors auto-close...pretty hard?
If you want to know what happened, listen to Shaun King's update. Apparently, she made several complaints against him for noise complaints and her apartment is right above his. So basically it looks like she went up there to confront him and she killed him, crazy.
Here is the link:
Typical Daily Mail. Even got the headline wrong. The apartment number is lighted...but that is not neon. Likely fluorescent though it might be LED. It is not neon.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
