Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Status:
"Smartened up and walked away!"
(set 27 days ago)
11,789 posts, read 5,798,330 times
Reputation: 14220
Advertisements
Quote:
Originally Posted by Boss
Wrong, she tried to bring it out and had staff working to bring it up. The GOP put a block on the investigation by demanding the name of the accuser before she was willing to allow it out.
so define "ATTEMPTED RAPE" or actions that could lead to rape. The professor said she believes his actions (allegedly) could have led to rape...so we are talking about state of mind.....or what?
so if we have a physical fight in high school, is that attempted murder because it could have led to that?
do we judge people for their actions or for what they could have done but didn't.
She also was afraid that she would die. I guess to libs that means he's guilty of murder?
If Booker did this, then he should recuse himself. Just as if it is proven Kavanaugh assaulted his accuser, he should be disqualified from consideration for SCOTUS.
I'm a liberal, and assault is assault, no matter who does it. No excuses.
If Booker did this, then he should recuse himself. Just as if it is proven Kavanaugh assaulted his accuser, he should be disqualified from consideration for SCOTUS.
I'm a liberal, and assault is assault, no matter who does it. No excuses.
The article he wrote says that the girl kissed him before he reached for her breast to grope her.
Status:
"everybody getting reported now.."
(set 24 days ago)
Location: Pine Grove,AL
29,560 posts, read 16,548,014 times
Reputation: 6042
Quote:
Originally Posted by DRob4JC
Regarding Kavanaugh - nobody is guilty of doing anything. There has been no testimony, only gossip at this point.
Regarding Booker - he self-admitted groping a woman who was drunk.
Actually , it seems based solely on the article that all he is admitting to is fumbling around with some girl on a bed and then her stopping him once she realized she didn't want to have sex or be felt up.
This isn't the same thing as slapping some random woman's butt or something like that.
They were likely kissing, and he wanted to do more and she didn't. He stopped when he saw she didn't want to do more
Actually , it seems based solely on the article that all he is admitting to is fumbling around with some girl on a bed and then her stopping him once she realized she didn't want to have sex or be felt up.
This isn't the same thing as slapping some random woman's butt or something like that.
They were likely kissing, and he wanted to do more and she didn't. He stopped when he saw she didn't want to do more
That's not Booker's account. He went in for what he thought would be a hug but got a kiss instead as it's a tradition for a New Year's celebration when the clock hits midnight. He then tried to do more and she resisted.
Going by SJW rules (and Booker is a SJW) he is guilty of some kind of transgression because he was in close enough proximity to a drunk female which allowed contact to happen and he escalated the previous physical boundary (established as a kiss by her) without her permission (which she couldn't give because she was drunk).
Wrong, she tried to bring it out and had staff working to bring it up. The GOP put a block on the investigation by demanding the name of the accuser before she was willing to allow it out.
The GOP dirt machine is working overtime.
Sad, so VERY sad, the TDS!
"I would ban ALL guns if i could" fienstein (EXCEPRT HER CONCEALED CARRY GUN) does NOT NEED the repubs to GRANT HER PERMISSION TO "investigate".
You LACK of knowledge on how the Senate works is GLARING.
She and her staff ALONE HAD THE LETTER So, who do you think leaked it"
Why, when she got the letter in JULY, didn't she IMMEDIATELY after getting it, turn it over to the committee chairman?
Why during the closed door Senate Judicial Committee meeting did she NOT bring it up?
Why, when she had a 1 on 2 meeting with Kavanaugh that lasted over 3 hours, did she NOT bring it up?
Why hasn't she STILL NOT GIVEN TH LETTER TO THE Committee?
NO, she held on to it to pull an "October surprise".
The ENTIRE group Dem members on the committee stated BEFORE the committee hearings even started, that they would NOT vote yes on Kavennaugh, so what difference does it make what is done?
Last edited by Quick Enough; 09-21-2018 at 05:39 AM..
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
