Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
View Poll Results: How many votes will Brett Kavanaugh get for confirmation in the Senate?
61 or more 14 6.25%
58-60 7 3.13%
55-57 13 5.80%
50-54 144 64.29%
49 or less 46 20.54%
Voters: 224. You may not vote on this poll

Closed Thread Start New Thread
 
Old 10-04-2018, 09:03 AM
 
14,489 posts, read 6,093,243 times
Reputation: 6842

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by jojajn View Post
The goalposts for a Justice have always been the same: integrity, non-partisan, level temperament, honesty, and ethical.





Sounds like Ginsburg shouldn’t be on the court then

 
Old 10-04-2018, 09:03 AM
 
13,388 posts, read 6,434,576 times
Reputation: 10022
Quote:
Originally Posted by southbel View Post
Concur. I've noticed several Democrats on here who are fully in support of what was done to Kavanaugh and cite Garland as if there is an equivalency. I think, to some, they truly believe it is no different which is pretty disturbing as one was political gamesmanship and the other actually personally injured and hurt people. I simply could never be the kind of person who supports the kind of actions the Democrats engaged in this last week just to win a political battle.
When the dust settles, the bolded will be what's left imo.

It also appears that there was an intentional effort to personally injure and hurt people or at best a reckless disregard of the sure knowledge that's what would happen.

Most Americans I know on either side have a good sense of what is fair and how far is too far.

I suspect the Democrats are going to get a rude awakening at the polls because what we have just witnessed is more vile and vicious politics than most Americans want to live with.
 
Old 10-04-2018, 09:04 AM
 
11,404 posts, read 4,081,658 times
Reputation: 7852
The FBI would've been able to sniff out Kavanaugh's lies or deceit, which is why Trump/White House did not allow the FBI to interview both he and Ford.
 
Old 10-04-2018, 09:05 AM
 
Location: Meggett, SC
11,011 posts, read 11,019,659 times
Reputation: 6192
Quote:
Originally Posted by NeutralParty View Post
Remember when Hillary Clinton was interviewed by the FBI? The GOP made sure that report was made public.

But the GOP is doing everything they can do block the Kavanaugh FBI report to remain secret, even though tens of millions of Americans (on both sides of the issue) want to see it.

Republicans are being hypocritical, but what else is new.
The reports are being handled per the 2009 MOU between Obama and the Senate Judiciary Committee (by then Chairman Senator Leahy). You have an issue of keeping this information private per the Privacy Act and this MOU, take it up with the people who set up the rules.
 
Old 10-04-2018, 09:05 AM
 
10,513 posts, read 5,162,490 times
Reputation: 14056
Quote:
Originally Posted by chucksnee View Post
Proof or more lies....

You must be joking. One accuser ignored. Many witnesses ignored. An "investigation" hurried along in three days proves it's a sham on its face. It's really sad to see the president abuse the FBI by ordering them to do a flawed and incomplete report on purpose.
 
Old 10-04-2018, 09:07 AM
 
25,436 posts, read 9,795,443 times
Reputation: 15325
Quote:
Originally Posted by jojajn View Post
The goalposts for a Justice have always been the same: integrity, non-partisan, level temperament, honesty, and ethical.
That's the past. Unfortunately, today we have anything but integrity, non-partisan, level temperament, honesty and ethical.
 
Old 10-04-2018, 09:07 AM
 
Location: Kansas City, MISSOURI
20,862 posts, read 9,518,220 times
Reputation: 15573
The way I look at this is, if Kavanaugh is confirmed, he probably won't last on the court as long as the conservatives would like, because he'll probably meet an early demise from cirrhosis of the liver. Or some other alcohol-related death.
 
Old 10-04-2018, 09:08 AM
 
13,388 posts, read 6,434,576 times
Reputation: 10022
Quote:
Originally Posted by NeutralParty View Post
The FBI would've been able to sniff out Kavanaugh's lies or deceit, which is why Trump/White House did not allow the FBI to interview both he and Ford.
The FBI does not "sniff out" lies or deceit or come to any conclusions in a background investigation.

They simply write down what everyone tells them.

How many times does that need to be explained?
 
Old 10-04-2018, 09:08 AM
 
Location: My beloved Bluegrass
20,125 posts, read 16,144,906 times
Reputation: 28333
Quote:
Originally Posted by NeutralParty View Post
Trump said the FBI has "free rein," that was a lie. The White House limited the scope and handcuffed the bureau from conducting a full and unimpeded investigation.

Several witnesses and Yale classmates who wanted to talk to the FBI were not interviewed.


This entire investigation was a sham, the GOP never cared about getting to the bottom of the allegations.


https://twitter.com/Arianedevogue/st...46810444812290
Or, just perhaps, the FBI felt nothing could be achieved by interviewing said witnesses. They didn’t interview my neighbor, who claims he went to Yale at the same time as all these folks and would have loved to be interviewed on this, either. He swears he flashed his weenie a couple of times at parties. I’m struggling to believe him, myself, but he swore it happened to my husband as he knocked back a few beers Saturday night.
__________________
When I post in bold red that is moderator action and, per the TOS, can only be discussed through Direct Message.Moderator - Diabetes and Kentucky (including Lexington & Louisville)
 
Old 10-04-2018, 09:09 AM
 
13,388 posts, read 6,434,576 times
Reputation: 10022
Quote:
Originally Posted by southbel View Post
The reports are being handled per the 2009 MOU between Obama and the Senate Judiciary Committee (by then Chairman Senator Leahy). You have an issue of keeping this information private per the Privacy Act and this MOU, take it up with the people who set up the rules.
In other words, they are using Standard Operating Procedure (SOP).
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Closed Thread


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top