Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
With sex dolls and A.I. in the future, men will have no reason to associate with women anymore. Feminism has not only destroyed women, but has very nearly destroyed men as well.
I know, I know, it was so much better when women were second class citizens, denied access to careers, denied access to credit. Heck, women should never have gotten the vote. Life was much better (for men) when they had no voice.
If some men want to make love to a plastic blowup doll, more power to them. Men like that are not men most women would want anyway.
When will these few people accused of sexual assault learn to take personal responsibility for putting themselves in that position?
You nailed it.
Most men have never nor will they ever be accused of harassment/ sexual misconduct because they choose to control their impulses.
At the same time, this movement seems to have created a new rationalization for some lonely guys.
Suddenly, guys who live in their own heads, observe rather than participate in life, make sweeping generalizations about others, who are challenged to engage in a two- way, face to face conversation and so on can now blame their lonely existence on avoiding being falsely accused of bad behavior.
LOL. If you think that the majority of men are going to walk away from women you are truly deluded. Ain't gonna happen on any kind of large scale. There's too much testosterone out there for that to become a reality.
I wish this whole innocent until proven guilty thing applied to the accusers as well. "She's lying" "She's a ****" "She's crazy" "She has an ulterior motive".
Well, perhaps you can get a law added so that accusers in cases where the only evidence is their testimony cannot be challenged or cross-examined by the defense?
We can't control what every internet troll or person with a political bent does.
But we can at least adhere to basic civil rights and due process.
What else would they want to associate with women?
Correct me if I'm wrong, but didn't you say somewhere that you are 16 years old? If so, then no one here is surprised that you can't think of a single thing a woman might be good for if not for sex. That is typical of a teenage boy's mindset.
I can agree there is some bias toward women when there is children involved. There is also the bias against women that they should make sure the child is cared for even if the dad won't. It's not a good situation for anyone when parents split. Splitting up a household income and making it support two households leaves them both broke. We had two incomes when the kids were little and there wasn't much extra money to go around even in that situation.
You don't think women get abused, manipulated, etc in relationships? That's equal opportunity right there if a person picks wrong. I think GYOW is a good idea for anyone until they can put themselves back together from abuse especially if a person has kids to worry about.
It isn't "some" bias; family courts are beyond corrupt and completely rigged to punish fathers and husbands. Just look at the statistics.
Of course women get abused, manipulated, etc...so do men--at a FAR higher rate than most people think. The problem is mens' abuse claims are either dismissed or are treated lightly--by cops and courts.
GYOW should be the gospel truth for everybody; it doesn't necessarily mean being single, either.
Well, perhaps you can get a law added so that accusers in cases where the only evidence is their testimony cannot be challenged or cross-examined by the defense?
We can't control what every internet troll or person with a political bent does.
But we can at least adhere to basic civil rights and due process.
Her testimony may be the only evidence there is. Kav wasn't on trial.
Most men have never nor will they ever be accused of harassment/ sexual misconduct because they choose to control their impulses.
At the same time, this movement seems to have created a new rationalization for some lonely guys.
Suddenly, guys who live in their own heads, observe rather than participate in life, make sweeping generalizations about others, who are challenged to engage in a two- way, face to face conversation and so on can now blame their lonely existence on avoiding being falsely accused of bad behavior.
1) You can get charged with crimes despite not even being present or ever meeting the person. This goes for all kinds of crimes and has been a well known civil rights issue.
2) The lonely guy attack while decrying their use of sweeping generalizations is not some of your best work but I can understand why recent events has everyone a little angry.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
