Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
You mean the baloney site you posted whose info is not backed up anywhere else at all? Show us another website to actually backup your nonsense claim and we might believe it. There is zero evidence these people are dangerous and I already told you the very definition of a caravan is a band of unified travelers. Look it up. Since they are not all in vehicles (in fact, few are), they can only move at walking speed or they would not be a caravan and they would have gotten to the US long before now.
The DHS is a baloney site? You don't think that out of 4-7 thousand people that there wouldn't be any criminals among them? Statistically alone there would be. You just keep digging a bigger and bigger hole for yourself.
These people were offered asylum in mexico and refused it. By international law they cannot possibly be legitimate asylum seekers.
If they are on private land with the blessing of the property owners and its posted I believe they can shoot them for trespassing.
They were offered work permits in the two most Southern states in Mexico if they filed for asylum, those areas are violent.
They were offered work permits in the two most Southern states in Mexico if they filed for asylum, those areas are violent.
Where's your link proving just what states of Mexico that they would be working in? Chiapas where they were at at the time is not one of the more dangerous states. I saw a map online depicting the most dangerous ones and Chiapas wasn't one of them.
Many of these "untrained wannabees", are actually very well trained. I would bet many are ex military also.
^Actually, most of them are ex military, and are ex military for a reason, and it's mostly because they got tired of being held back by red tape. They are also better trained as well.
They were offered work permits in the two most Southern states in Mexico if they filed for asylum, those areas are violent.
Chicago is "violent". Tijuana is violent.
Escaping violence for politicsl asylum means you would be victimized for your political views. Mexico is not honduras orel salvador.
Are you advovating altering internationsl asylum criteria to allow "welfare shopping"?
Because thats what these people are up to and thats what reveals them to not be legitimate asylum seekers.
"Here is some help for you."
"Well sure thats better than what I had but its not good enough, I can do better than what you offer. I want to stay with that really rich neighbor over there".
Where's your link proving just what states of Mexico that they would be working in? Chiapas where they were at at the time is not one of the more dangerous states. I saw a map online depicting the most dangerous ones and Chiapas wasn't one of them.
This was from December 2017
Quote:
In Mexico, Armed Men Force Thousands Of People Out Of Chiapo
James Fredrick
Violent unrest in the Mexican state of Chiapas has displaced thousands of indigenous people, and concern is growing about a possible humanitarian crisis.
Violent unrest in the Mexican state of Chiapas has displaced thousands of indigenous people, and concern is growing about a possible humanitarian crisis.
FREDRICK: She tells him how they burned her corn and beans fields - everything. Now she sleeps in the mountains hungry and with a hurting heart. In October, after a series of murders, armed men began forcing these villagers out of their homes. In a month, an estimated 5,000 people have been displaced.
I asked for a link denoting what states in Mexico that the migrants in the caravan would be working in. Still waiting. As for Chiapas here's the map I was talking about and it's for year 2018. Chiapas is not one of the dangerous states of Mexico.
Chicago is "violent". Tijuana is violent.
Escaping violence for politicsl asylum means you would be victimized for your political views. Mexico is not honduras orel salvador.
Are you advovating altering internationsl asylum criteria to allow "welfare shopping"?
Because thats what these people are up to and thats what reveals them to not be legitimate asylum seekers.
"Here is some help for you."
"Well sure thats better than what I had but its not good enough, I can do better than what you offer. I want to stay with that really rich neighbor over there".
They didn't accept work permits in violent Mexican states so they are "shopping" around. You need to do more research on the states where they were offered accommodation, you know nothing about what was offered, Just making excuses, these families marching thousand of miles are asking too much.
Your sarcasm is absurd.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
You don't think that out of 4-7 thousand people that there wouldn't be any criminals among them? Statistically alone there would be. 
You just keep digging a bigger and bigger hole for yourself.
