Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 12-02-2018, 01:55 PM
Status: "Moldy Tater Gangrene, even before Moscow Marge." (set 6 days ago)
 
Location: Dallas, TX
5,790 posts, read 3,603,118 times
Reputation: 5697

Advertisements

WW2 was justified due to it being naked aggression by one power against other independent nations. Vietnam was ultimately due to America's "Red Scare" paranoia compelling it to jump into a nation whose history and culture we knew nothing about.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 12-02-2018, 01:58 PM
 
Location: Here and now.
11,904 posts, read 5,594,163 times
Reputation: 12963
Quote:
Originally Posted by desertdetroiter View Post
We had it in WW2 because we were fighting for our national survival.

The Vietnam War had absolutely NOTHING to do with our survival as a nation. The United States will always win wars that are justified based on our national survival. We’ll always lose wars that are attempts to impose unwanted hegemony and imperialism on another nation or region. It’s why we can’t win in Iraq or Afghanistan and won’t win in Iran if we try the same crap there.

It’s why the United States needed a draft for Vietnam, but had lines around the block trying to sign up for WW2.

We will never win a bad war. We aren’t cut out for it.
This is the second post you've made her I would like to rep.

As to the original question, my answer would be as follows:

The enemy was clearly defined.

The goal - to protect our allies, and ultimately, ourselves - was clearly defined.

The vast majority of Americans agreed on both the enemy and the goal.

I don't think it's a good idea to romanticize any war. War is terrible, and people - even the "good guys" sometimes commit terrible acts in times of war. However, I believe that WWII was at least the last time most Americans knew why we were fighting and agreed that the cause was a just one. Perhaps it is that spirit of unity, rather than the war itself, that is being romanticized.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-02-2018, 02:00 PM
 
Location: Los Angeles
7,826 posts, read 2,731,632 times
Reputation: 3387
Quote:
Originally Posted by burdell View Post
Robert McNamara was a foolish man who believed virtually any issue could be reduced to numbers and utterly failed to understand the deep emotional attachment the Vietnamese people had to their ancestral lands, that it was a fool's errand thinking we could move people around their country at our will to accommodate our own poorly made plans.
Watch the documentary...he pretty much admits that. I have turned on people from the Vietnam era, I was in diapers when it started, to this documentary and it's amazing that their views towards McNamara are engraved in stone which is understandable. I don't have the same emotional baggage with this guy and didn't see a broken man or somebody who is foolish. I did see somebody coming to terms with what he did and imparting what he learned for future generations.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-02-2018, 02:03 PM
 
Location: Los Angeles
4,627 posts, read 3,398,811 times
Reputation: 6148
Quote:
Originally Posted by desertdetroiter View Post
We had it in WW2 because we were fighting for our national survival.

The Vietnam War had absolutely NOTHING to do with our survival as a nation. The United States will always win wars that are justified based on our national survival. We’ll always lose wars that are attempts to impose unwanted hegemony and imperialism on another nation or region. It’s why we can’t win in Iraq or Afghanistan and won’t win in Iran if we try the same crap there.

It’s why the United States needed a draft for Vietnam, but had lines around the block trying to sign up for WW2.

We will never win a bad war. We aren’t cut out for it.
You are on fire in this thread desertdetroiter. Great post.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-02-2018, 02:03 PM
 
1,675 posts, read 577,849 times
Reputation: 490
Romanticize the aggressor who ended up losing? This is the best answer to OP.

Quote:
Originally Posted by desertdetroiter View Post
The Second World War was a War to end fascism. We won.

The Vietnam War was an attempt at establishing American hegemony over a region that we had no business being in. It was an imposition of a superpower on a people that had had enough of superpowers imposing their will on them. It was a case of the United States inserting itself into a civil war between the only two factions that would determine the outcome of their nation...the North and South Vietnamese people. We never had any say so in the ultimate outcome.

Moreover, the United States as a superpower failed miserably by losing the war and getting ran out of the country by a comparatively ragtag army that didn’t have a 100th of our resources. The only resources they needed were National will, grit, determination, courage and the knowledge that if they hung in there, the Americans would have to eventually go home anyway. It was a stunning defeat for the United States.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-02-2018, 02:08 PM
 
Location: Los Angeles
4,627 posts, read 3,398,811 times
Reputation: 6148
Quote:
Originally Posted by JohnBoy64 View Post
Watch the documentary...he pretty much admits that. I have turned on people from the Vietnam era, I was in diapers when it started, to this documentary and it's amazing that their views towards McNamara are engraved in stone which is understandable. I don't have the same emotional baggage with this guy and didn't see a broken man or somebody who is foolish. I did see somebody coming to terms with what he did and imparting what he learned for future generations.
Thanks for the link to the documentary. Watched the opening and it looks great.

Yeah, I agree with you and I think we are in the same age range (Gen X). For all his flaws and mistakes, at least McNamara was able to admit his mistakes.

By contrast, saw Dick Cheney in an interview recently. No remorse or willingness to admit that the invasion of Iraq in 2003 was a huge mistake.

Ok, goodnight JohnBoy….haha.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-02-2018, 02:35 PM
 
18,735 posts, read 33,410,912 times
Reputation: 37323
A rather dim co-worker of mine asked me, "Were all of those hijackers Iraqis?" And when I told her none of them were, she asked, "Then why did we invade Iraq?"

No kidding.

My father was a combat veteran in Europe, answered the draft in 1944 and fought across to the Occupation. He was Jewish and always said he knew what he was fighting for and that he wasn't mad at the Japanese. (Although I think he should have been). He also said he wished he'd gone to Israel in 1948 but actually felt his parents had been through enough with four sons in combat in WW2. When Vietnam happened, he certainly felt it was wrong-headed.

Obviously, the model for recent wars/police actions was the total war of WW2. It would appear Cheney thought that the U.S. could occupy Iraq from top to bottom *and* take all the oil, without considering the cost in blood and treasure it took to occupy Germany and stay for so many years.

I agree with those who say there was "nothing to win" in Vietnam. It was so clearly a civil war and we turned it into a proxy war and certainly not a total war that could be won at unfathomable price. I knew this when I was a teenager and just felt guilty/relieved that no one told me at age 18 to decide.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-02-2018, 02:54 PM
 
24,006 posts, read 15,100,850 times
Reputation: 12965
Quote:
Originally Posted by burdell View Post
Robert McNamara was a foolish man who believed virtually any issue could be reduced to numbers and utterly failed to understand the deep emotional attachment the Vietnamese people had to their ancestral lands, that it was a fool's errand thinking we could move people around their country at our will to accommodate our own poorly made plans.
Robert McNamara finally understood his folly when Viet Nam took his son.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-02-2018, 03:06 PM
 
30,077 posts, read 18,682,634 times
Reputation: 20896
Quote:
Originally Posted by knowledgeiskey View Post
WWII had more casualties, and it had a higher draft enlistment rate. In fact, Vietnam had a higher share of voluntary enlistment.


We won
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-02-2018, 03:26 PM
 
18,069 posts, read 18,832,764 times
Reputation: 25191
Quote:
Originally Posted by desertdetroiter View Post
The Second World War was a War to end fascism. We won.

The Vietnam War was an attempt at establishing American hegemony over a region that we had no business being in. It was an imposition of a superpower on a people that had had enough of superpowers imposing their will on them. It was a case of the United States inserting itself into a civil war between the only two factions that would determine the outcome of their nation...the North and South Vietnamese people. We never had any say so in the ultimate outcome.

Moreover, the United States as a superpower failed miserably by losing the war and getting ran out of the country by a comparatively ragtag army that didn’t have a 100th of our resources. The only resources they needed were National will, grit, determination, courage and the knowledge that if they hung in there, the Americans would have to eventually go home anyway. It was a stunning defeat for the United States.
Did not see this post before I posted.

Clap, clap, clap, bravo, could not have said it better.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 02:48 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top