Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Fair enough. However, you dismissing her religious beliefs still makes you a bigot.
Dismissing her religious beliefs IN CONTEXT OF HER JOB is fair, not bigoted. You just said it was "fair enough." You can't say "Fair enough, but that's unfair." Makes you look a bit ridiculous.
They can crap in one hand and wish in the other see which one fills up faster. Christians will be persecuted even more before a final solution is found to the problem of cultural marxism.
How was she persecuted? No one stopped her from having an adulterous affair which produced twins nor from her divorcing four times, but she wanted to stick her self-righteous nose in the personal lives of others. Seems to me she was the one doing the persecuting.
The county clerk didn't remove her at the first notice of her blocking the requests, so the argument could be made that they tacitly approved of her actions.
She is elected official, she cannot be simply removed by bureaucratic decision.
They can crap in one hand and wish in the other see which one fills up faster. Christians will be persecuted even more before a final solution is found to the problem of cultural marxism.
This is not a private business like a baker. This is a public official and as such her personal beliefs are irrelevant in carrying out the duties she has been assigned.
How was she persecuted? No one stopped her from having an adulterous affair which produced twins nor from her divorcing four times, but she wanted to stick her self-righteous nose in the personal lives of others. Seems to me she was the one doing the persecuting.
That poster is talking about a final solution, which is very Hitler-esque.
What you call a bigot was someone who chooses not to violate her religious believes.
The office she held dictates she issues the license, if that is unacceptable to her she should of resigned or never ran for the office.
A baker being required to bake cake for gay couple is whole other story because that is privately owned business. In that case the gay couple can opt to go to another bakery.
What you call a bigot was someone who chooses not to violate her religious believes. You scoff at that notion and her religion and that makes you a bigot too.
Her job entails following the law. She can quit if she has such a problem with it. She is a bigot.
And an ugly, ignorant, disgusting, butt ugly hick.
Yeah and she's also been married 4 times, add hypocrite to the list too.
I have to do stuff at my job all the time that I don't agree with.
What you call a bigot was someone who chooses not to violate her religious believes. You scoff at that notion and her religion and that makes you a bigot too.
She had every right to do that. What she didn't have a right to do is decide the laws do not apply to her. If she was able to step aside and still allow the system to work, I would defend her.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
