Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 02-23-2019, 09:44 AM
 
26,694 posts, read 14,579,129 times
Reputation: 8094

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by EveryLady View Post
Obama came from a well-educated family with a caring mother and grandparents. Most kids born into poverty aren't so fortunate. Sure they may have affection lavished on them but it often doesn't translate into the type of focused attention that Obama received.

I have no dog in this fight. We can't begin to close the gap between rich and poor until we look at the root causes. They are pervasive and persistent enough that it's unrealistic to think the average poor boy can pull himself up by his bootstraps. But then they are also pervasive and persistent enough many most social programs may not have a substantial remedial impact. Our political system is too divided to make the kind of committed effort that might make a difference.

There are some who still decry the New Deal pointing out that it was only ww2 that pulled us out of the depression. This forgets that in the interim New Deal programs probably kept folks from starving. The War on Poverty is the poster child of social programs that do not work say some. Granted it did not alleviate poverty but it raised living standards among the poor above a level that would be unsustainable in today's world where an expose is but one YouTube video away.

The many pages of this thread are primarily devoted to defending our system. In the end, what we have may well be the best "fit" for Americans. But it is interesting that so few appear to grasp why many Europeans look at America in askance and thank God they have a European passport. Life in a social democracy may not be the wealthiest way to live but it can make for a better overall lifestyle.

The new crop of young progressive Democrats aside, I don't see that happening here.
Whose fault that is when someone is born into a lousy family? The parents, the society or the taxpayers?

The income gap is not an issue at all. It’s made up to stir jealousy from those who can’t or unwilling to work for it.

The upward mobility is the issue. The real question should be asked is how we can help the poor to become rich quickly? Today, though not perfect, the American society has the highest mobility with 80% of millionaires being self made and first generation rich. Think Warreb Buffet, Bill Gates, Schultz, Jobs, Bezo etc. etc. etc. interestingly the rich can’t hold on to their rich status with 70% of them losing their wealth by the third generation and 90% by the fourth.

Poverty in America, there’s no real poverty in america, is a cultural thing. People who value frugality and education particularly in STEM and finance rise up to the top; those value sports, gangster/celebrity lifestyle, and ignoring education mostly remain poor.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 02-23-2019, 09:47 AM
 
Location: West Coast of Europe
25,947 posts, read 24,759,378 times
Reputation: 9728
Quote:
Originally Posted by ELOrocks17 View Post
Its simple:

If you are a conservative, you try to make everyone rich

If you a re a liberal, you try to tax the rich until they are poor..so everyone is poor
a) Which has never worked, it is an illusion.

b) That's a nonsense accusation, no matter how often it is repeated.
Look at Scandinavia, they have very high tax rates, yet they have very few poor.

https://www.statista.com/statistics/...ecd-countries/
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-23-2019, 09:49 AM
 
Location: West Coast of Europe
25,947 posts, read 24,759,378 times
Reputation: 9728
Quote:
Originally Posted by lifeexplorer View Post
Whose fault that is when someone is born into a lousy family? The parents, the society or the taxpayers?

The income gap is not an issue at all. It’s made up to stir jealousy from those who can’t or unwilling to work for it.

The upward mobility is the issue. The real question should be asked is how we can help the poor to become rich quickly? Today, though not perfect, the American society has the highest mobility with 80% of millionaires being self made and first generation rich. Think Warreb Buffet, Bill Gates, Schultz, Jobs, Bezo etc. etc. etc. interestingly the rich can’t hold on to their rich status with 70% of them losing their wealth by the third generation and 90% by the fourth.

Poverty in America, there’s no real poverty in america, is a cultural thing. People who value frugality and education particularly in STEM and finance rise up to the top; those value sports, gangster/celebrity lifestyle, and ignoring education mostly remain poor.
Statistics prove you wrong, there are many countries with higher social mobility.
Haven't you read the past couple of pages where people have posted links to statistics?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-23-2019, 09:55 AM
 
Location: Houston, TX
3,909 posts, read 2,124,080 times
Reputation: 1644
No tax breaks, flat tax, no corporate tax incentives, and no bailouts. Eliminate the Fed while your at it too.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-23-2019, 10:15 AM
 
26,694 posts, read 14,579,129 times
Reputation: 8094
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mtnluver8956 View Post
No tax breaks, flat tax, no corporate tax incentives, and no bailouts. Eliminate the Fed while your at it too.
Frankly government regulations are the root cause. Get the government out of life and we will flourish.

For example, why can I start my own bank? People who trust me can deposit their money with me and I in return give them interest. Except the amount of government regulations for operating a bank is so burdensome that only the rich can afford.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-23-2019, 10:22 AM
 
Location: Austin
15,640 posts, read 10,400,743 times
Reputation: 19549
How do you close the gap between rich and poor?

America could adopt a socialist government like Venezuela, the type of government Senator Bernie Sanders and Rep. Ocasio-Cortez have been advocating.

By Correo del Orinoco International
Jul 31st 2011 at 8.33am

Venezuela: Lowest Percentage of Social Inequality in Latin America

Venezuela has the lowest percentage (0.38 percent) of social inequality in Latin America, according a report released by the United Nations Economic Commission for Latin America and the Caribbean (ECLAC).


The President of the National Institute of Statistics, Elias Eljuri, said on Monday that the ECLAC report shows that extreme poverty in Venezuela was reduced from 21 percent in 1999, when the Bolivarian Revolution began, to 6.9 percent, with a tendency to continue decreasing.



Of course, after adopting socialism, the citizens are starving in Venezuela 8 years later and the government has recently been taken over by a violent dictator.....but, there is no income inequality! everyone is living in poverty in Venezuela now.

Last edited by texan2yankee; 02-23-2019 at 10:30 AM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-23-2019, 10:31 AM
 
Location: the very edge of the continent
89,060 posts, read 44,877,895 times
Reputation: 13718
Quote:
Originally Posted by leebeemi View Post
We encourage the hoarding of wealth with our tax code. There's little incentive to invest in one's own workforce, when it's so easy to just keep it all.
What, exactly, do you think investing is? Do you mistakenly think the wealthy just hoard their wealth in cash under their mattresses, or something like that?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-23-2019, 10:34 AM
 
Location: Marquette, Mich
1,316 posts, read 749,163 times
Reputation: 2823
Quote:
Originally Posted by InformedConsent View Post
What, exactly, do you think investing is? Do you mistakenly think the wealthy just horde their wealth in cash under their mattresses, or something like that?



No, but the "investments" you speak of are to enrich themselves, and others like themselves. It's a shell game, and only the people at the top truly benefit. There is no trickle down, there is no great reward for the hard work at the bottom.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-23-2019, 10:36 AM
 
Location: the very edge of the continent
89,060 posts, read 44,877,895 times
Reputation: 13718
Quote:
Originally Posted by lifeexplorer View Post
Whose fault that is when someone is born into a lousy family? The parents, the society or the taxpayers?

The income gap is not an issue at all. It’s made up to stir jealousy from those who can’t or unwilling to work for it.

The upward mobility is the issue. The real question should be asked is how we can help the poor to become rich quickly? Today, though not perfect, the American society has the highest mobility with 80% of millionaires being self made and first generation rich. Think Warreb Buffet, Bill Gates, Schultz, Jobs, Bezo etc. etc. etc. interestingly the rich can’t hold on to their rich status with 70% of them losing their wealth by the third generation and 90% by the fourth.

Poverty in America, there’s no real poverty in america, is a cultural thing. People who value frugality and education particularly in STEM and finance rise up to the top; those value sports, gangster/celebrity lifestyle, and ignoring education mostly remain poor.
Bingo! Neither society nor taxpayers are to blame for the poor ill-advisedly bearing children they cannot afford to support, thereby dooming those children to a lifetime of hardship and struggle, as well.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-23-2019, 10:39 AM
 
Location: the very edge of the continent
89,060 posts, read 44,877,895 times
Reputation: 13718
Quote:
Originally Posted by Neuling View Post
Statistics prove you wrong, there are many countries with higher social mobility.
Haven't you read the past couple of pages where people have posted links to statistics?
They also tax regressively instead of progressively. So I'm assuming you're on board with switching the US to a regressive tax system, no?

Be sure to read the scatter plot chart and understand what it is telling us. There IS a distinct pattern. Read and learn:

How Other Developed Countries Tax and Spend

There's even a link to the research on which the Washington Post article is based. It includes numerous additional citations.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 03:48 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top