Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 03-26-2019, 11:53 AM
 
Location: Gaston, South Carolina
15,713 posts, read 9,528,541 times
Reputation: 17617

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by skeddy View Post
Mueller, a Special Counsel, and 40 FBI agents, wouldn't spend 2 years investigating this, turn over a report, then watch it be misrepresented by an AG and the Asst. AG.

Where do you guys come up with your silliness?
So you're telling me if Janet Reno had delivered a report to Congress on what Ken Starr turned up, you would be OK with The Starr Report never being released? Let us see the Report. There's too many cranks and conspiracy theorists on both sides of the aisle who will misconstrue things and we will not be able to combat any falsehoods if we don't have a public Report.

I wonder if there are confidentiality agreements in place with Mueller's team? Does anyone know?

 
Old 03-26-2019, 11:57 AM
 
7,520 posts, read 2,811,117 times
Reputation: 3941
Quote:
Originally Posted by Joe the Photog View Post
So you're telling me if Janet Reno had delivered a report to Congress on what Ken Starr turned up, you would be OK with The Starr Report never being released? Let us see the Report. There's too many cranks and conspiracy theorists on both sides of the aisle who will misconstrue things and we will not be able to combat any flasehoods if we don't have a public Report.

I wonder if there are confidentiality agreements in place with Mueller's team? Does anyone know?
Are you paying attention? The rules were changed because of the fiasco that Congress made after the Starr report. To protect grand jury testimony, unindicted persons, and classified information.
 
Old 03-26-2019, 12:00 PM
 
Location: Gaston, South Carolina
15,713 posts, read 9,528,541 times
Reputation: 17617
Quote:
Originally Posted by redwood66 View Post
Are you paying attention? The rules were changed because of the fiasco that Congress made after the Starr report. To protect grand jury testimony, unindicted persons, and classified information.
I understand the rules were changed. Change the rules back for transparencies sake. Redact anything that needs redacting. Otherwise, there should be no Special Counsel investigations into anything ever again.
 
Old 03-26-2019, 12:02 PM
 
Location: Gaston, South Carolina
15,713 posts, read 9,528,541 times
Reputation: 17617
The other option would be that a Special Counsels investigation should never be considered the end game. No conclusions drawn and both sides should welcome Congressional investigations without claiming anyone has been exonerated or found "not guilty."
 
Old 03-26-2019, 12:03 PM
 
13,212 posts, read 21,835,413 times
Reputation: 14130
Quote:
Originally Posted by hbdwihdh378y9 View Post
Yes, we do know because there wasn't any Russian interference.
What ever you say.
 
Old 03-26-2019, 12:10 PM
 
1,893 posts, read 1,011,158 times
Reputation: 2089
Quote:
Originally Posted by Johnhw2 View Post
Why did Obama not act with vigor and seriousness on this. This was his watch, he focused his energy and mind on pupping up the russian collusion hoax rather than go after russia directly. He thought he could kill two birds with one stone and now you whine before he failed to stop the Russian meddling? Thats rich.
Obama said that he didn't want to appear to be meddling. Who thought Dunce Trump had a snowball's chance? Even those in idiot Trump's circle were shocked. Witnesses said Grumpy was pale as a ghost when it dawned on him how over his head he'd be. 2016 Election WAS A SHOCK TO EVERYONE SAVE PUTIN.

Last edited by TBMorgan; 03-26-2019 at 12:28 PM..
 
Old 03-26-2019, 12:16 PM
 
Location: Denver CO
24,201 posts, read 19,219,950 times
Reputation: 38267
Quote:
Originally Posted by hbdwihdh378y9 View Post
Yes, we do know because there wasn't any Russian interference.
False.

At most, we know that there was not a conspiracy between the Trump campaign and the Russians - and even that we don't for sure, because not enough evidence for a criminal indictment isn't the same thing as it not happening at all. That's where seeing the actual report comes in handy.

But even aside from that, we know - because of all the US intelligence agencies who have said so - that Russia did interfere in the election. Even if Trump/the campaign had nothing do with that, it still happened.

Last edited by emm74; 03-26-2019 at 12:26 PM..
 
Old 03-26-2019, 12:17 PM
 
18,069 posts, read 18,826,533 times
Reputation: 25191
Quote:
Originally Posted by SE1SG View Post
Collusion is and was right in front of you -> OPEN YOUR EYES AND EARS and engage that little thing in between.

You don't need someone else to tell you it is or isn't. Read, listen, and process the information for yourself!!

If a thief tackles you and takes your purse, do you need an f'n judge to tell you whether or not the thief robbed you????

Don't answer.

I already know trumpets have drawn the line @ comparing themselves to Germans following Hitler, but will accept ANYTHING else the orange mob idiot does.
You better go and tell them all this evidence you have a collusion then.
 
Old 03-26-2019, 12:23 PM
 
Location: Long Island
57,317 posts, read 26,228,587 times
Reputation: 15648
Quote:
Originally Posted by redwood66 View Post
Are you paying attention? The rules were changed because of the fiasco that Congress made after the Starr report. To protect grand jury testimony, unindicted persons, and classified information.
There is considerably more than just Grand Jury testimony and right now McConnell is blocking release period. The house unanimously requested its release and Trump claimed the same.
 
Old 03-26-2019, 12:25 PM
 
Location: Long Island
57,317 posts, read 26,228,587 times
Reputation: 15648
Quote:
Originally Posted by hbdwihdh378y9 View Post
Yes, we do know because there wasn't any Russian interference.
Barr’s summary indicates there was interference and named the Russian Agency.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Closed Thread


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 02:01 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top