Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Let's bitchslap the Republican whining and lying about the Mueller Investigation.
The purpose of the Mueller investigation was never to "get Trump". It was "to ensure a full and thorough investigation of the Russian govemments efforts to interfere in the 2016 presidential"
The Mueller investigation, which Trump is trying to make out like it's totally the work of the Democrats, started when a Deputy Attorney General who was nominated by Trump appointed a registered Republican to head the investigation.
Ken Starr on the other hand was appointed by a three judge panel of the D.C Circuit Court This three judge panel headed by David B. Sentelle. David B. Sentelle was put on the D.C Circuit Court by Ronald Reagan. Another member of that panel was Joseph Tyree Sneed III. Joseph Tyree Sneed III was put on the bench by Richard Nixon. They appointed Ken Starr, a Republican who was appointed Solicitor General of the United by George H.W. Bush.
How confident could we be that Ken Starr could be fair and honest and not partisan? This August 6 1994 article from Los Angeles Times should give you a good idea.
"Ironically, although the three-judge panel said that it needed to replace Fiske to assure the independence of the investigation because he had been chosen by the Clinton Administration, the switch actually could heighten the partisan nature of the inquiry.
While both Fiske and Starr are Republicans, Starr is widely viewed as a more partisan choice because of his service under Clinton's 1992 political opponent and because he is said to have given legal advice to the lawyers for Paula Corbin Jones, the woman who is suing Clinton for alleged sexual harassment.
In addition, lawyers involved in the case predicted that the switch in investigators will delay the conclusion of the investigation, perhaps forcing Clinton to defend himself against embarrassing conclusions closer to the 1996 presidential election."
The Ken Starr report was also released. We didn't just get a summary written by Janet Reno.
The purpose of the Mueller investigation was never to "get Trump". It was "to ensure a full and thorough investigation of the Russian govemments efforts to interfere in the 2016 presidential"
The Mueller investigation, which Trump is trying to make out like it's totally the work of the Democrats, started when a Deputy Attorney General who was nominated by Trump appointed a registered Republican to head the investigation.
Ken Starr on the other hand was appointed by a three judge panel of the D.C Circuit Court This three judge panel headed by David B. Sentelle. David B. Sentelle was put on the D.C Circuit Court by Ronald Reagan. Another member of that panel was Joseph Tyree Sneed III. Joseph Tyree Sneed III was put on the bench by Richard Nixon. They appointed Ken Starr, a Republican who was appointed Solicitor General of the United by George H.W. Bush.
How confident could we be that Ken Starr could be fair and honest and not partisan? This August 6 1994 article from Los Angeles Times should give you a good idea.
"Ironically, although the three-judge panel said that it needed to replace Fiske to assure the independence of the investigation because he had been chosen by the Clinton Administration, the switch actually could heighten the partisan nature of the inquiry.
While both Fiske and Starr are Republicans, Starr is widely viewed as a more partisan choice because of his service under Clinton's 1992 political opponent and because he is said to have given legal advice to the lawyers for Paula Corbin Jones, the woman who is suing Clinton for alleged sexual harassment.
In addition, lawyers involved in the case predicted that the switch in investigators will delay the conclusion of the investigation, perhaps forcing Clinton to defend himself against embarrassing conclusions closer to the 1996 presidential election."
The Ken Starr report was also released. We didn't just get a summary written by Janet Reno.
What Barr released was a summary of the “principle conclusions”
Basically its just the outcome of the investigation, like looking at the final score of a baseball game rather than a play by play.
The democrats took that to mean a summary of the entire investigation..that was incorrect.
It wasnt a summary of the details leading up to outcome.
It wasnt a summary of methods that lead to the outcome.
It wasnt a summary of questions asked to witnesses.
It was just a summary of the final outcome
The report isnt going to change that final outcome , it is just going to allow people to see the details and how that outcome was reached.
At the end of day Barr is the AG and his decision is what counts and its still going to be no collusion, no obstruction, no conspiracy, no crime....and Trump will still be your president.
What Barr released was a summary of the “principle conclusions”
Basically its just the outcome of the investigation, like looking at the final score of a baseball game rather than a play by play.
The democrats took that to mean a summary of the entire investigation..that was incorrect.
It wasnt a summary of the details leading up to outcome.
It wasnt a summary of methods that lead to the outcome.
It wasnt a summary of questions asked to witnesses.
It was just a summary of the final outcome
The report isnt going to change that final outcome , it is just going to allow people to see the details and how that outcome was reached.
At the end of day Barr is the AG and his decision is what counts and its still going to be no collusion, no obstruction, no conspiracy, no crime....and Trump will still be your president.
Lol
No, Trump will not be my president and he never will be. And if we had only gotten a summary by Janet Reno after the Ken Starr investigation there are about zero conservatives who would have said "At the end of day Reno is the AG and her decision is what counts"
Lol
(What is it with cons and lol anyway? They're always loling. What's up with that?)
BS... That’s the way you’re spinning it, but for the Dems ... is was about trying to get Trump.
Plain and simple. Now that it backfired on you people... oh it was never about Trump.
Hilarious! If it wasn’t about Trump... why are all the Dems and the MSM crying foul?
Why are people like Schiff still saying that Trump is guilty? According to Mueller.. there was Russian interference, but NONE of it involved Trump, his family or his campaign people?
But, but, but ... Trump!
Your side lied to the American public for 2 years, and you’re still lying!
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Let's bitchslap the Republican whining and lying about the Mueller Investigation.
