Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
The only thing Jerry Nadler should be doing is replacing the urinal cakes in the men's room. He is nothing more than a vindictive worthless dirt bag and the perfect example of why Democrats should never be in charge of anything.
I don't know, when she asked Barr, the Attorney General of the United States of America, if he thought it was OK for the President to tell his White House council to lie (Don McGahn) Barr couldn't/wouldn't answer. When she asked if he thought it was OK for the President to threaten a witness's family (Cohen) Barr couldn't/wouldn't answer.
That's where we're at kids....
1. Neither of those things actually happened.
2. She wouldn't allow him to answer .... these are not Yes/No questions when what she stated as "fact" did not actually happen.
Where is your law degree from? Does it meet the threshold of being corrupt? Be specific, not your opinion, but show how there is enough evidence to go beyond a "reasonable doubt"....
2 of the top United States law enforcement officer, after 22ish months....and all those lawyers involved, and who knows who else was used, could not come to a conclusion? You agree, or you just don't care....
It sure appears that Mueller left this up to congress, not Barr and if you read through the report there were some holes in the investigation. Plenty of omissions, destroyed emails, inability to get testimony from foreign nationals, no testimony from the president and a lack of memory.
But in the end Barr made his decision with his promo a few weeks ago and decided this was his "baby".
Remember when everyone said that if Mueller had a problem with Barr's summary he would have said something. well evidently he did. So are you going to ignore him.
1. Neither of those things actually happened.
2. She wouldn't allow him to answer .... these are not Yes/No questions when what she stated as "fact" did not actually happen.
You mean like did Trump ever suggest Barr to open an investigation, why did that take several minutes to answer.
It sure appears that Mueller left this up to congress, not Barr and if you read through the report there were some holes in the investigation. Plenty of omissions, destroyed emails, inability to get testimony from foreign nationals, no testimony from the president and a lack of memory.
But in the end Barr made his decision with his promo a few weeks ago and decided this was his "baby".
Remember when everyone said that if Mueller had a problem with Barr's summary he would have said something. well evidently he did. So are you going to ignore him.
He said Barr’s summary was accurate
He only complained about tje media coverage, whatever that means
Lol
Yep - there were a lot of posters on this board, many of whom are actively defending Barr on this thread, who repeatedly hung their hat on the argument that we should blindly trust Barr’s interpretation because Mueller’s silence was proof it was accurate. Now that it appears that the opposite is true, these intellectually dishonest posters won’t eat their words.
It's an expected pattern of dysfunction and delusion. When Mueller testifies they will try to discredit him like Barr did today. They are desperate and willing to compromise for a president that offers nothing but corruption, greed, and immorality. Thankfully, the base is very small.
It's an expected pattern of dysfunction and delusion. When Mueller testifies they will try to discredit him like Barr did today. They are desperate and willing to compromise for a president that offers nothing but corruption, greed, and immorality. Thankfully, the base is very small.
Mueller carries much more weight with the American people than Barr does. Mueller will win the court of public opinion. And nobody knows really what the man is going to say or more importantly how he will contextualize His report.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
