Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Do you actually think someone would get their penis whacked off just to compete against lesser competition?
Lesser competition? Whoa there! We've been beat over the head for decades with the mantra that women are just as capable as men physically! Are you now saying they are NOT?
Do you actually think someone would get their penis whacked off just to compete against lesser competition?
These guys don’t have to cut anything off to compete. If the Equality Act passes, they won’t even need to be on hormones to compete. They already don’t have to in Connecticut for high school sports, where two guys who wear makeup are dominating in track and field competitions. You may not care, but girls who worked their whole lives to compete do care because it’s blatantly unfair.
These guys don’t have to cut anything off to compete. If the Equality Act passes, they won’t even need to be on hormones to compete. They already don’t have to in Connecticut for high school sports, where two guys who wear makeup are dominating in track and field competitions. You may not care, but girls who worked their whole lives to compete do care because it’s blatantly unfair.
If they identify as women, they're women. Case closed. Equality for all!
I am all good with extending rights to the transgendered but there has to be common-sense regulations that recognize the physical advantages of being both with male DNA and physique in many areas including athletics. Rarely should things be completely black and white... this is a world of grays.
I'm physically good.... but no athlete. It wouldn't be fair for me to compete in Special Olympics.
What you just said is sexist by new emerging standards. You claimed their are genetic differences between men and women on average that leads to different results.
I've had students tell me that claiming men have higher levels of testosterone on average and testosterone has implications on muscle and spatial recognition on the brain is BS. Men average more muscle, because society tells men to exercise more is their rationale.
What you just said is sexist by new emerging standards. You claimed their are genetic differences between men and women on average that leads to different results.
I've had students tell me that claiming men have higher levels of testosterone on average and testosterone has implications on muscle and spatial recognition on the brain is BS. Men average more muscle, because society tells men to exercise more is their rationale.
Somebody made the comment in an illegal immigration thread that liberals are about emotion, and conservatives consider all the implications of an issue. Re: illegal immigration I agree with that assessment. As it relates to men competing with women, I also agree. Agenda-driven-insanity is not a good national policy justification. About illegals. Or sports. Or a whole host of other issues that are dominating conversations in 2019.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
