Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Great post. I would love to see anyone who could respond intelligently to that.
Of course, my guess is that some will say that this doesn't matter at all because the real fault is with those hotel owners who charge so much to begin with and so the poor should not have to pay anything. SMH!!
Which brings up another problem. When you have more people from open borders and mass immigration forever increasing demand things cost more regardless of who is paying for it.
Location: New Albany, Indiana (Greater Louisville)
11,974 posts, read 25,486,476 times
Reputation: 12187
Why can't 'race realist' conservatives see the need for birth control and family planning through govt agencies like Planned Parenthood? Do they enjoy complaining about poor women having far more births than educated women while proposing no solution?
Why can't 'race realist' conservatives see the need for birth control and family planning through govt agencies like Planned Parenthood? Do they enjoy complaining about poor women having far more births than educated women while proposing no solution?
Last I checked, nobody was trying to outlaw birth control. There is plenty of stuff you can buy at the local drugstore, and double up on protection - something for him and something for her - just to be extra safe. It's not exactly rocket science.
Why can't 'race realist' conservatives see the need for birth control and family planning through govt agencies like Planned Parenthood? Do they enjoy complaining about poor women having far more births than educated women while proposing no solution?
There will never be a solution just as long as the Democrat's socialistic programs keep paying them to have more kids. There already are free birth control clinics around. Planned Parenthood also did abortions and that's what many on the right objected to.
If medicaid pays for more than 50% of births in this country, it is a definite sign that capitalists do not pay enough for the two legged commodity to reproduce, forget raising costs. If the owners refuse paying maintenance costs a building crumbles.
There will never be a solution just as long as the Democrat's socialistic programs keep paying them to have more kids. There already are free birth control clinics around. Planned Parenthood also did abortions and that's what many on the right objected to.
The poor do not have many kids these days, once this fertility trend became obvious abortion loving Republicans reinvented themselves as pro lifers over night.
When has it ever been affordable to have a child in the history of man on this planet? Like I said, if money, not love, is the reason for having a child, stop. And shaming people is not a good look ...
My wife and I have 2 children. We didn't go into debt to have either of them. Now, we had jobs and health insurance, and owned - with the Bank - our home.
I may or may not go into debt to send them to college.
By the way, the stupidity/ignorance of "when has it ever been affordable" ignores what the human race did until about 100 years ago, which was produce that which they needed for themselves, or that which their labors could be used to purchase that they couldn't produce.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
