Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 09-17-2019, 07:50 AM
 
Location: Huntersville/Charlotte, NC and Washington, DC
26,700 posts, read 41,753,896 times
Reputation: 41381

Advertisements

I was browsing my Facebook feed this morning and I came across a post a friend shared that was very controversial to say the least. The post suggested that making a woman believe you like her just to have sex with her be considered sexual assault. It generated a lot of strong opinions on both sides.

My thoughts: yes leading people on for sex is cruel. But criminalizing it is not something I will get behind. Consent is still given even if under false pretenses. Sex is not and should not be a money back or emotions back guarantee. It is a judgement call and punishing someone because you made a poor judgement call is not cool. It is also impossible to measure a level of emotion from an outside perspective on how much they like someone. The focus on fighting sexual assault should be on people who are having things done to them completely against their will.

What say y’all?
Attached Thumbnails
Criminalizing leading people on for sex? Yay or nay?-8aaad838-55bf-4b43-ad51-2f8996113371.jpeg  
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 09-17-2019, 07:56 AM
 
Location: UK
1,153 posts, read 567,769 times
Reputation: 2027
How silly.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-17-2019, 08:01 AM
 
Location: Brentwood, Tennessee
49,927 posts, read 59,966,647 times
Reputation: 98359
How would you ever prove it? Intent is one of the hardest things to prove in court. And I can't think of a law that says we are supposed to stay with every person we have sex with forever anyway.

Nobody's ready to have that conversation yet because it's a dumb and dangerous conversation.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-17-2019, 08:13 AM
 
Location: Central Virginia
6,562 posts, read 8,398,266 times
Reputation: 18809
Nay. Dumb idea.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-17-2019, 08:24 AM
 
Location: Middle of the valley
48,534 posts, read 34,873,169 times
Reputation: 73802
Absolutely not. That's thought policing, impossible to enforce, impossible to prove, and NOT a direction we should go with laws.

Plus, it is in an effort to remove personal responsibility (the woman in the equation) and I'm sorry, that is not equality.
__________________
____________________________________________
My posts as a Mod will always be in red.
Be sure to review Terms of Service: TOS
And check this out: FAQ
Moderator: Relationships Forum / Hawaii Forum / Dogs / Pets / Current Events
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-17-2019, 08:32 AM
 
Location: So Cal
52,283 posts, read 52,713,798 times
Reputation: 52788
It's silly.

How in the world would there even be a metric to determine this. It's completely a "he said she said" type of thing.

That tweet was probably generated by some woman that felt used by a guy that probably did act like he wanted more or led her on. It happens, people act less than stellar all the time, men and women.

Trying to criminalize it sounds ludicrous to me
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-17-2019, 08:39 AM
 
Location: Phoenix, AZ
20,396 posts, read 14,673,179 times
Reputation: 39507


Her argument is based on a few flawed pieces of framework.

To unpack...
Every individual involved must give consent to each piece of what may or may not become a relationship. Men have the right to say no, too. True consent can be withdrawn at any time. You might agree to sex, and then change your mind, say no, and get up and leave. Saying yes at one point does not give someone the right to FORCE you to follow through against your will in such circumstances. And consent must be given not only for sex or sexual acts, but also for ongoing relationships and commitments. If someone can speak marriage vows, and later get a divorce, then no man is obligated to continue dating somebody because they had sex with them. And a choice to end an association does not necessarily equal lies and using--he can change his mind. So can she. You can like somebody one day, and not like them the next.

People need to understand that there will never be any guarantee in dating, that your feelings won't get hurt. It is part of life. Hurt feelings are valid, but they don't give you the right to claim that someone is a villain and you are a victim of wrongdoing on their part.

This also feeds into the "female sex as commodity, coin to pay for relationship/commitment/etc" concept, and I hate that. It runs completely contrary to my belief that women have every right to simply enjoy sex for its own sake, every bit as much as a man has.

That said, some people certainly engage with others under false pretenses and misrepresent themselves, to try and get what they want. I think that it sucks that anybody feels like they have to do so, and I think that it's unethical behavior. But not every piece of human dysfunction needs to be codified and criminalized, nor would it help anything to do so. It takes more than a law to teach people how to be decent humans.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-17-2019, 09:32 AM
 
Location: NNJ
15,074 posts, read 10,108,006 times
Reputation: 17276
Nah... Very dangerous precident and I don't believe laws should be put into place to protect peoples' feelings.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-17-2019, 09:48 AM
 
Location: Middle of the valley
48,534 posts, read 34,873,169 times
Reputation: 73802
I would advise the girl in question to give someone power of attorney over her as she does not sound competent enough to be on her own.
__________________
____________________________________________
My posts as a Mod will always be in red.
Be sure to review Terms of Service: TOS
And check this out: FAQ
Moderator: Relationships Forum / Hawaii Forum / Dogs / Pets / Current Events
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-17-2019, 09:50 AM
 
Location: State of Transition
102,216 posts, read 107,956,787 times
Reputation: 116166
Lying to women to get them to fall in love with you and have sex with you was an actual law on the books in some Latin American countries as recently as the 90's. It may still be on the books in some. It's a "bad" law, because nothing is provable. It's a he-said, she-said situation.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 10:04 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top