Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Except during the Obama administration when states took it upon themselves to implement their own
Immigration policy, the tea party gullible thought that was just fine. Hypocrisy much?
Actually, no. The EPA has the authority to regulate this. You guys certainly thought so when Obama was at the switch. And you were right, at least about that. Of course there was a lot of discussion and disagreement about the standards that the Obama administration published. But the EPA's authority to regulate these standards was not part of that disagreement.
There is no reason why a state should have preeminent authority over the national government when it comes to vehicle standards. And according to the law and the constitution, they do not.
What do you think that the reason for an injunction would be, other than that this person is just a partisan judge who would prefer that a Democrat was president and making these decisions?
The administration appears to be claiming the grant of the rights to set standards to CA was illegal. CA will get an injunction on the basis it is legal. CA may very well win that even at the SC.
Except during the Obama administration when states took it upon themselves to implement their own
Immigration policy, the tea party gullible thought that was just fine. Hypocrisy much?
Exactly. Apparently, the OP is too young to remember the LA of the 1950’s and 1960’s when the smog was a running gag for comedians and late nite talk shows. It began to negativity impact California’s economy
Quote:
Originally Posted by Chicano3000X
In the 90s they had smog days where it was harmful to be outside.
Conservatives really do operate on nostalgia..
are you aware that they're actually not getting rid of emissions standards?
The administration appears to be claiming the grant of the rights to set standards to CA was illegal. CA will get an injunction on the basis it is legal. CA may very well win that even at the SC.
Because you say so. Alrighty then.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
