Quote:
Originally Posted by Goodnight
Where did you get that from, how about answering the question rather than "what about".
|
when our government sets a precedent ...then the what a bouts are valid
yes there was collusion.... with Russia and china....by the Clintons, and Obama.........and with Ukraine by obama
yes there was obstruction....by comey, lynch an the Clintons
yes there was more obstruction... by the democrats and the media
funny how the America hating liberals will never admit it
the fascist liberals should be warned to tread very carefully in this...as they may open up a can of worms on themselves
you say you want a honest debate... mention "business dealing of trump with Russia...
but as soon as someone shows the facts that hitlery/Obama had many of the same dealing..you dismiss it
lets look at the claimed money laundering the dims say about trump...but FAIL to look in the mirror
even though there is tones of evidence that all the money laundering was done by the Clintons
hmm so-called alleged money laundering...
many connections to Obama and the clintons
the same Russian Investment Fund leader (Russian mafia) who met Trump has had dealings with, has met with bill and Hillary, and paid bill's speaking fee
the same Erik Prince (Blackwater) who got his first contracts under..bill Clinton
the same Sheikh Mohammed bin Zayed, Crown Prince of Abu Dhabi who met with Bill Clinton
the same Sheikh Mohammed bin Zayed, Crown Prince of Abu Dhabi who gave a million dollars to help fund the Clinton Presidential Library
the same George Nader , a Lebanese-American businessman, who was a negotiator with Syria during the Clinton administration, for the Israel-Syria talks...the same Nader who acted in president Obama's behalf for his foreign policy team...under SoS Hillary Clinton
the same oligarch paid Clinton millions
Quote:
emails show Clinton Foundation staff pushed Hillary Clinton's State Department to approve a meeting between Bill Clinton and a powerful Russian oligarch as her agency lined up investors for a project under his purview.
The Clintons' relationship with Viktor Vekselberg, the billionaire whose name appears in the documents, has taken on new significance amid an expanding criminal
https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/e...-investigation
|
Quote:
Quote:
Bill Clinton sought State Department approval to invite a powerful, Putin-backed Russian oligarch with an expansive history of corruption to the Clinton Global Initiative’s 2012 meeting while Clinton’s wife was secretary of state, according to an e-mail newly obtained by National Review.
The June 4, 2012 message was sent by Amitabh Desai, Bill Clinton’s foreign-policy director at the Clinton Foundation and the same man who later asked the State Department’s permission for Clinton to give paid speeches in North Korea and the Democratic Republic of the Congo.
|
Quote:
Quote:
“Would [the U.S. government] have any concerns about CGI inviting Viktor Vekselberg, President of Renova Group, to attend CGI Annual Meeting in NYC in September?” Desai asks Clinton confidantes Cheryl Mills, Jake Sullivan, and Michael Fuchs under the subject line “Russia/Viktor Vekselberg?”
Valued at around $18 billion and described as the “oligarch’s oligarch,” Vekselberg is perhaps the richest man in Russia. Russian dissidents describe him as a key component of Putin’s economic regime, a man who has helped consolidate Russian industry under businesses friendly to the Kremlin in exchange for sweetheart deals and kickbacks. Vekselberg’s Renova Group, which contributed between $25,000 and $50,000 to the Clinton Foundation, seems to have tendrils in virtually every aspect of the Russian economy, from precious metals to oil to high-tech industry.
https://www.nationalreview.com/2015/...r-putin-email/
|
from 2015
Democrats and the left didn't just collude with Russia and Ukraine ; they embraced them, and show no shame in having done so.
https://www.investors.com/politics/e...rump-campaign/
Let's get real: Democrats were first to enlist Ukraine in US elections
https://thehill.com/opinion/campaign...n-us-elections
https://lawandcrime.com/high-profile...mueller-probe/
Americans stop short when it comes to providing military aid and equipment to Ukraine. Just 26 percent think the U.S. should do so in response to Russia's actions, and far more - 65 percent - think the U.S. should not, including majorities of Republicans (59 percent), Democrats (67 percent), and independents (69 percent).
https://www.cbsnews.com/news/america...kraine-crisis/
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
