Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
"In part" a parody. Anyone with two brain cells to rub together could tell that if they listened to what he said.
The point being he was forthright, from the beginning, that this wasn't a literal transcript or recounting of what was said.
No "in part" it was a testimony....period. The fact that he said "in essence" means nothing especially since it was in front of congress...oh and BTW, the transcript was already out....why do you keep avoiding that fact? Anyone with 1/1024th of a brain, would understand this, yet here you are killing it.
Quote:
Originally Posted by hooligan
It's certainly no more egregious a misrepresentation than Trump himself has been guilty of time and time again.
So, this is the, well he does it also, so it's cool if we do it....
Actually the key witness spoke today, Bill Taylor. Trump has a rather large problem. All the career state department employees testified in spite of Trumps attempts to block their testimony.
I would love to see Giuliani walk into the hearing, haven heard much from him since his "associates" were arrested.
Actually the key witness spoke today, Bill Taylor. Trump has a rather large problem. All the career state department employees testified in spite of Trumps attempts to block their testimony.
I would love to see Giuliani walk into the hearing, haven heard much from him since his "associates" were arrested.
To the bold, trump has been circling the toilet bowl (numerous times), going down (numerous times), we got him now (numerous times), "All the career state department employees testified in spite of Trumps attempts to block their testimony" ...and yet...here were are....
To the bold, trump has been circling the toilet bowl (numerous times), going down (numerous times), we got him now (numerous times), "All the career state department employees testified in spite of Trumps attempts to block their testimony" ...and yet...here were are....
Where did the whistle blower go?
Why are you still digging for the whistle Blower when you have first hand information, you were complaining that the whistle blower had second or third had information. Now you have people that witnessed this debacle.
Why are you still digging for the whistle Blower when you have first hand information, you were complaining that the whistle blower had second or third had information. Now you have people that witnessed this debacle.
It's all just hand-waving nonsense. Like the repeated "was the transcript already released?" question.
Why are you still digging for the whistle Blower when you have first hand information, you were complaining that the whistle blower had second or third had information. Now you have people that witnessed this debacle.
I did, but why does my response mean anything when it's in congress? They were supposed to use the "whistle blower."
Asked and answered, counselor. It's irrelevant to your claim.
No, because you think you've answer means absolutely 100% nothing.
Quote:
Originally Posted by hooligan
We're done here. Have fun screaming into the void - I'm getting off this merry-go-round of crazy.
I've been answering you, so yes, we can agree that you are a void....a void of useless answers.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
