Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
That's the Biden spin on it. Just like how Trump said he wanted to investigate Biden because of the premise that the commander in chief needs to investigate this. However, Democrats claimed it was for his personal benefit. How's that different than what Joe Biden did? Under an 'official' umbrella do something that personally helps him [his family?]
And all the governments of the EU, the leadership of WorldBank AND the leadership of the International Monetary Fund? How do you explain ALL of them wanting Shokin gone in addition to the Obama Administration?
Quote:
Originally Posted by exm
See above - Trump got IMPEACHED for a similar situation.
As far as the crime aspect is concerned, there hasn't been a serious investigation in the Biden's regarding Hunter so we can't comment if that's true.
Similar in that it involved the Ukraine and monetary aid. That's where the similarities end.
You've got it backward, you need probable cause for an investigation - you don't have an investigation to see if there is probable cause. The Ukraine has announced, publicly, multiple times, that Hunter was never under investigation and that they see no evidence of any wrongdoing by Hunter while at Burisma. If the DoJ feels they have PC to investigate Hunter(or Joe, for that matter), why haven't they done so, yet?
And all the governments of the EU, the leadership of WorldBank AND the leadership of the International Monetary Fund? How do you explain ALL of them wanting Shokin gone in addition to the Obama Administration?
Similar in that it involved the Ukraine and monetary aid. That's where the similarities end.
You've got it backward, you need probable cause for an investigation - you don't have an investigation to see if there is probable cause. The Ukraine has announced, publicly, multiple times, that Hunter was never under investigation and that they see no evidence of any wrongdoing by Hunter while at Burisma. If the DoJ feels they have PC to investigate Hunter(or Joe, for that matter), why haven't they done so, yet?
You mean how the Dems are digging for dirt on Trump?
Looking back in time...Barisma was known as a corrupt company. Multiple investigations around the world were turning towards them. Great Britain had seized their assets. The company owner left the country. About that time Obama's VP, Joe Biden becomes the "point man" on Ukraine policy. And shortly after, his son, recently kicked out of the Navy for drug use, in trouble for not paying his divorce settlement, and a known customer of prostitutes gets a million dollar a year job with Barisma. All with zero experience in the oil and gas industry. Ukraine is investigating Burisma....and Joe, in his own words (see video in link above) brag of blackmailing them with US taxpayer dollars into firing the prosecutor in charge of investigation into Barisma. And (Son of a B!) they fire the prosecutor.
The story the Dems like to tell is that the prosecutor Shokin wasn't "tough enough" on corruption and that is why Biden blackmailed Ukrainian leadership into firing him. My question-once he was fired-who was the tough, honest prosecutor that replaced him, what charges were brought against Barisma and who was sent to prison for corruption? I have done some degree of searching and (son of a B) haven't found a definitive answer. All I end up with is sites trying to deflect from Biden's actions.
Can you tell me what other European counties were involved in having the prosecutor removed?
SEEMS HE HAS AS TRIED TO BE A PRODUCTIVE MEMBER OF SOCIETY.
Hunter Biden:
Biden spent decades struggling with alcohol and drug addiction. He said, "There's addiction in every family. I was in that darkness. I was in that tunnel—it's a never-ending tunnel. You don't get rid of it. You figure out how to deal with it
Can you tell me what other European counties were involved in having the prosecutor removed?
Yes, I, too, would like to know which elected officials from other countries threatened to withhold aid to Ukraine if they didn't fire their prosecutor. To Biden defenders: Name them, and provide proof.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
