SCOTUS Chief Justice John Roberts Should Be Impeached (ethical, Brown, examples)
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Sorry buddy but to quote you "WRONG!" Title 7 of the CRA was not changed this week by SCOTUS try reading.
"In 2012, the EEOC ruled that employment discrimination on the basis of gender identity or transgender status is prohibited under Title VII. The decision held that discrimination on the basis of gender identity qualified as discrimination on the basis of sex whether the discrimination was due to sex stereotyping, discomfort with the fact of an individual's transition, or discrimination due to a perceived change in the individual's sex.[67][68] In 2014, the EEOC initiated two lawsuits against private companies for discrimination on the basis of gender identity, with additional litigation under consideration"
So it seems the court simply ruled based on existing law, "Scary, isn't it" .....
Legislating from the bench, activist judges. LOL
So now we are going to impeach justices when we don't like their opinions, Gorsuch and Roberts will be gone just like Trump's cabinet heads.
Scalia didn't get impeached for Citizens United so there is precedent.
SCOTUS Chief Justice John Roberts Should Be Impeached.
Roberts clearly committed perjury before the Senate Judiciary Committee. His lying began in his opening statement, which said in part "...Judges and Justices are servants of the law, not the other way around. Judges are like umpires. Umpires don’t make the rules, they apply them. The role of an umpire and a judge is critical. They make sure everybody plays by the rules, but it is a limited role. Nobody ever went to a ball game to see the umpire."
In several cases Roberts has ignored the rules and created laws that were expressly against the will of Congress, which is the only branch of government authorized to make laws.
For lying to Congress, a felony, Roberts should be impeached.
….another boring liberal who claims impeachment without knowing facts.... ZZZzzzzzzzzz
Which cases? The SC cannot make laws. They can only give interpretations and opinions.
The SC just made the law in the job discrimination case. Roberts helped make Obamacare law when he decided the word 'penalty' means 'tax.' This the SC only interprets line is drivel.
All about the rule of law and each branch of government fulfilling their proper roles. The original DACA EO is illegal. That is what the Court should have ruled on.
I think you mean you think the outcome was right, whether or not the original EO was legal.
Because Roberts allowed an illegal EO to stand while setting aside the remedy to the illegal EO.
.
Its not about the legality of the EO.
In his ruling he said " Its not whether DHS may rescind DACA( they may ), but its about the way they went about it".
If they can try one more time to rescind it convincingly, they can still do it.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
