Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
This eyewitness, an independent reporter, states that he heard multiple gunshots all around the gas station as the mob converged on Kyle Rittenhouse who was protecting the business.
He then focused on Kyle who, fearing for his life, started running away from the angry mob, unsure who the gunfire was targeting. The reporter was only feet away from Kyle as he was being chased by Joseph Rosenbaum, the angry man who earlier had taunted Kyle to shoot him, and saw him throw something at Kyle and ultimately trap him between some parked cars. And when Rosenbaum attempted to take his rifle - Kyle shot him!
Clearly self-defense (as were the subsequent two shootings).
The reporter's eyewitness account was actually used in the criminal complaint to support the homicide charge in the 1st shooting The homicide charges are Don't Make the Riots Worse charges.
A school shooter is breaking the nonaggression principle. They are the aggressor, and should be dealt with as such.
Rittenhouse was not the aggressor. He was attacked by a violent mob and defended himself.
Again he was in a crowd with a gun, he was reported to be the shooter of the first victim and was pointed out as such. At that point in time he was an active shooter in a crowd, not unlike a school shooter, and that is why he was "attacked".
If you believe we are in a good place with a 17 year old armed with an AR-15 patrolling our streets I have no idea what you are thinking. How'd it work out anyway? Who could have predicted this outcome when a child brings a gun like this to a protest.
Last edited by DaveinMtAiry; 08-29-2020 at 11:35 AM..
Again he was in a crowd with a gun, he was reported to be the shooter of the first victim and was pointed out as such. At that point in time he was an active shooter in a crowd, not unlike a school shooter, and that is why he was "attacked".
You think Rittenhouse just started shooting people for no reason? Really? Cite proof of this, because everything i have seen shows either he is in danger of immediate physical harm, or his life was in danger, and he had nowhere to retreat to, before he fired his gun in self defense.
Im curious how people who do not support these rioters and looters, the fact that the courts have charged Rittenhouse with multiple felonies...does this now change your opinion on 'law and order' (it definitely should!)
Im curious how people who do not support these rioters and looters, the fact that the courts have charged Rittenhouse with multiple felonies...does this now change your opinion on 'law and order' (it definitely should!)
They have to arrest him for possible murder, because their are dead people on the ground.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
The homicide charges are Don't Make the Riots Worse charges.