Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Forbes picked up on this story came out today from the Atlantic which the twitter link goes to. This is an insider who the magazine has close to the Trump campaign who is claiming that the campaign strategy to undermine the election.
The article is stupid and biased. You should be ashamed to be associated with such ham-handed propaganda.
The Trump campaign has to be prepared to respond to large-scale election fraud. There's nothing wrong with that.
I only see this working in a state like PA where the legislature is Republican, but the Governor is a Democrat. States like MI the Republican Gov Rick Snyder endorsed Joe Biden. How does that even work if the Governor doesn't go along with it.
The article is stupid and biased. You should be ashamed to be associated with such ham-handed propaganda.
The Trump campaign has to be prepared to respond to large-scale election fraud. There's nothing wrong with that.
Why should I be ashamed for what linking the story so we can read it the OP had a twitter link to the Atlantic news have to pay $60 a year subscriptions fee.
There is no large scale election fraud you been misled and obviously are too lazy to go actually investigate the claims into how our election system works. 33 states + DC have used no excuse mail in voting going back to 1970s voters makes the choice how they want to vote. The term "Universal mail in voting" is something that Trump made up. 100% of all mailed in ballots are verified mostly by signature or some other personal identify information. Arizona my state has had mail in voting for over 20 years the ballot is verified by signature from your drivers license.
100% mail in voting has been in place for over a 13 years in 5 states OR, WA, CO, UT, HI. None of those states make a difference to Trump if he wins or loses, but they also verify the same way as any other state who uses a mail in ballot.
Trump campaign knows they are losing or why would they attack a voting system if they were winning?
Why should I be ashamed for what linking the story so we can read it the OP had a twitter link to the Atlantic news have to pay $60 a year subscriptions fee.
There is no large scale election fraud . . . .
Of course, there is. Not everywhere all the time, obviously, but some times in some places, yes.
Quote:
Trump campaign knows they are losing or why would they attack a voting system if they were winning?
Because the use of the voting system is susceptible to fraud. The person who intends to win fairly will oppose practices that can cause him to "lose" unfairly.
Your right he was the former. I still can't see how any of this really could work what the Atlantic story is saying. Maybe it's more of a fake out just get the Biden campaign to spend money on doing something about it.
Of course, there is. Not everywhere all the time, obviously, but some times in some places, yes.
Because the use of the voting system is susceptible to fraud. The person who intends to win fairly will oppose practices that can cause him to "lose" unfairly.
The Losers of the election always complain about the system when they lose human nature I understand how you feel about it.
Well, since Trump's favorite source of info is involved, maybe after detailing plans for the coup he'll tell us where Donny's phantom healthcare plan is.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.