Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
View Poll Results: Lowering Medicare Eligibility to Age 60
Biden Voter and I Support It 39 40.21%
Biden Voter and I Don't Support It 11 11.34%
Trump Voter and I Support It 13 13.40%
Trump Voter and I Don't Support It 34 35.05%
Voters: 97. You may not vote on this poll

Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 10-11-2020, 04:01 PM
 
21,989 posts, read 15,751,030 times
Reputation: 12944

Advertisements

Joe Biden has said he wants to see Medicare eligibility lowered from 65 to 60. Do you support that? Would you support that if Trump supported it? What if it meant your side (whichever side that is) would win more elections?

The GOP has shown that they don't care about deficits since Trump took office, in fact, they support another $2 trillion stimulus right before the election. And they know the 60+ age bracket tends to be reliable voters. Does that figure into the calculation?

We also know that most Medicare recipients have not paid for the benefits they receive. They depend on current workers paying into the system.

"Few seniors have actually paid for their Medicare benefits. According to an Urban Institute estimate, the typical retired couple paid $122,000 in lifetime Medicare taxes but can expect to receive benefits worth $387,000.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/...cial-security/

Does that matter to voters?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 10-11-2020, 04:02 PM
 
34,300 posts, read 15,697,372 times
Reputation: 13053
No
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-11-2020, 04:08 PM
 
Location: Native of Any Beach/FL
35,770 posts, read 21,139,250 times
Reputation: 14272
Think we have it ok at 65. I don’t use it - but unless disabled that is a good age.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-11-2020, 04:10 PM
 
6,832 posts, read 14,065,005 times
Reputation: 5768
I'm 57 but think it should remain at age 65.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-11-2020, 04:12 PM
 
16,956 posts, read 16,787,071 times
Reputation: 10408
Biden is an idiot.

Leave it at 65.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-11-2020, 04:16 PM
 
Location: Wartrace,TN
8,104 posts, read 12,833,920 times
Reputation: 16581
Where do I vote in your poll? I am voting third party.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-11-2020, 04:16 PM
 
107 posts, read 46,291 times
Reputation: 184
People are living longer and working later into live than any time in American history. It makes no sense to extend senior citizen benefits to healthy working adults.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-11-2020, 04:17 PM
 
Location: mancos
7,788 posts, read 8,044,187 times
Reputation: 6706
I had to take it at 65 and pay 140$ a month for part b or be fined 10% for life for each year I did not accept medicare.Thanks for nothing and leave the 60 year olds alone.Medicare is not free.69 and still never used it but still pay every month.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-11-2020, 04:17 PM
 
Location: Michigan
5,655 posts, read 6,239,039 times
Reputation: 8260
I would like it to be a buy-in option at 60. I think it would make early retirement easier for me and I'm sure many others. And I suspect if enough folks were able to retire early as a result it could help the economy since folks that can retire early have the savings to do so. Early retirement would get those savings spent 5 years earlier and provide opportunities for promotion for other workers.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-11-2020, 04:23 PM
 
21,430 posts, read 7,483,237 times
Reputation: 13233
I support lowering it to age 55 at least. We could consider other age options.

Part A is paid out of Social Security commencing at 65, anyone who joins before qualifying would have to pay for Part A until their 65th birthday, but that is viable.

Adding younger people to the pool would definitely strengthen the program. Making preventive care more accessible would definitely bring down the overall costs across the country by helping reduce emergency room visits.

I don't see why not.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top