Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 12-30-2020, 09:59 AM
 
Location: Manchester NH
15,507 posts, read 6,438,068 times
Reputation: 4831

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by VA Yankee View Post
You must really think that Gone With the Wind is factual history...

Extrapolated by northern industry where did you pull that one from, 3.9 million+ were enslaved in 1860 what does that have to do with northern industry? i'll tell you nothing...
The type of slavery changed leading up to the 1860s.

Cotton production became so dominate the south was no longer producing enough food to feed themselves.

It was imported from elsewhere which gave financers in the north power over southern investment.

If you did not invest in cotton or tidal farming, then you could not own land. This created the worst type of slavery, the same one northerners were claiming to fight against.

 
Old 12-30-2020, 10:05 AM
 
73,032 posts, read 62,646,469 times
Reputation: 21938
Quote:
Originally Posted by tipsyguam View Post
slavery was evil, hopefully you are angry with other places that participated in it.



Unless you find the original signers of the Declaration of Independence to England traitors to England too, your stance here is hypocritical.
Other places that had slavery are wrong for that too, but we are not talking about those places. We're talking about right here in America, and in particular, the former Confederate states. Do not deviate from that.

And those who signed the Declaration of Independence, they are not traitors to the USA. Robert E. Lee, however, is. We are only talking about who committed treason against the USA in this case, so let's keep it there.
 
Old 12-30-2020, 10:07 AM
Status: "Let this year be over..." (set 25 days ago)
 
Location: Where my bills arrive
19,219 posts, read 17,102,322 times
Reputation: 15538
Quote:
Originally Posted by Winterfall8324 View Post
The type of slavery changed leading up to the 1860s.

Cotton production became so dominate the south was no longer producing enough food to feed themselves.

It was imported from elsewhere which gave financers in the north power over southern investment.

If you did not invest in cotton or tidal farming, then you could not own land. This created the worst type of slavery, the same one northerners were claiming to fight against.
Poor crop selection is the fault of everyone who wanted to get rich quick with the cash crop, their choice.

Poor Financial Management is the fault of the individual no different than today.

No where in any history book has the mandatory farming of cotton or "tidal farming" whatever that is been documented. What publications are you referencing.

Like today farmers are businessman whether they have 50 or 5000 acres and if they make poor buisness choices they may lose that land, no different than today.
 
Old 12-30-2020, 10:09 AM
 
46,964 posts, read 26,011,859 times
Reputation: 29455
Quote:
Originally Posted by Winterfall8324 View Post
Being a slave does not dictate how well the master treats you.
No matter how "well" the master treats you, you're still a slave. Cruelty and humiliation is built into the institution.
 
Old 12-30-2020, 10:12 AM
 
73,032 posts, read 62,646,469 times
Reputation: 21938
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dane_in_LA View Post
No matter how "well" the master treats you, you're still a slave. Cruelty and humiliation is built into the institution.
This is part of the reason "Live Free or Die" means something to me. Chattel slavery is chattel slavery. Man is suppose to be free.
 
Old 12-30-2020, 10:48 AM
 
46,964 posts, read 26,011,859 times
Reputation: 29455
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ellis Bell View Post
You're both right ---
Nah. "Never saw a slave in their life" is effin' nonsense.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Winterfall8324 View Post
The 1/3 of families means only the head patriarch was the 'owner'.

That is about 30% that interacted with slaves, not 30% that owned one.
That's why I used the word "families".

Quote:
Either way, the majority of civil war fighters never owned a slave.
We've gone from "never saw a slave in their eyes" to "never owned a slave"? Those goalposts are moving faster than Lee retreating from Gettysburg.

Quote:
The other thing you fail to understand is most of these families weren't massive plantations like in Gone with the Wind.
I know. That's why you can't argue that most Southern soldiers were dewy-eyed innocents about slavery.

Quote:
They were small land holders with 4-5 slaves. In these places the masters worked on the fields with the slaves, and even shared with their food.
Sure, they were practically egalitarian.

Stop making excuses. Idyllic slavery is still slavery. Massa's sons can still have their way with your daughters if they wish and you'll hang for raising a hand against them. That's reality.
 
Old 12-30-2020, 10:55 AM
 
46,964 posts, read 26,011,859 times
Reputation: 29455
Quote:
Originally Posted by Winterfall8324 View Post
Slavery is not inhuman, it is something practiced in every family in the world.
I hope you warmed up before attempting that stretch.
 
Old 12-30-2020, 10:58 AM
 
1,958 posts, read 702,684 times
Reputation: 563
Quote:
Originally Posted by Winterfall8324 View Post
read my previous reply to you to understand why it matters.

Slavery is not inhuman, it is something practiced in every family in the world.

The inhuman practice was extrapolated by northern industry, that is why slavery was so awful in the south.

Not southern culture.
Slavery is inhuman, period. No culture in this world would believe a slave is one of them, stop watching disney+.
 
Old 12-30-2020, 11:08 AM
 
4,192 posts, read 2,514,758 times
Reputation: 6573
Anyone who thinks American slavery was a benign institution shows a profound lack of knowledge of the history of this nation. Imagine taking your children to the store and on the way passing a slave market. The men, women and children up on a platform, nude, exposed, fondled like cattle. What many people don't know is that Richmond is a port city, even today its a deep water port city. Before 1860 through the port of Richmond, and the five railroad lines that ran through the city, 10,000 and some times as many as 20,000 thousand slaves a year were exported from the slave markets. Slaves were bred - by contemporary accounts - by placing a bag over the woman while she was being impregnated, it reenforced the anonymity; the debasement, the dehumanization. Lumpkin's jail in Richmond was one such clearinghouse.
 
Old 12-30-2020, 12:00 PM
 
73,032 posts, read 62,646,469 times
Reputation: 21938
Quote:
Originally Posted by VA Yankee View Post
Poor crop selection is the fault of everyone who wanted to get rich quick with the cash crop, their choice.

Poor Financial Management is the fault of the individual no different than today.

No where in any history book has the mandatory farming of cotton or "tidal farming" whatever that is been documented. What publications are you referencing.

Like today farmers are businessman whether they have 50 or 5000 acres and if they make poor buisness choices they may lose that land, no different than today.
This is indeed true. The Deep South was a one trick pony in terms of agriculture. It chose to be that way because it saw there was alot of money in growing cotton. And the aristocracy looked down on the very industry that made them money.

It is ironic that a state as fertile as Mississippi never grew alot of food crops. Mississippi is a good place to grow stuff like peaches, strawberries, and other bountiful food crops. It certainly has the climate for it. Mild winters, plenty of rainfall. The Deep South in general could have fed itself and the rest of the country. However, most of its agriculture involved cash crops. And this was exposed during the Civil War. During the war, there were food shortages. The South had to quickly go from cash crops to growing food to feed itself. And given what war is, there was alot of chaos, stealing, etc, from both sides.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Closed Thread


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 09:10 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top