Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 10-29-2021, 05:02 PM
 
Location: A safe distance from San Francisco
12,350 posts, read 9,739,423 times
Reputation: 13892

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by MJJersey View Post
Of course, we knew this. People were getting it multiple times before the vaccine was even created.
What people are these? Can we see some factual real-world evidence?

 
Old 10-29-2021, 05:03 PM
 
Location: colorado springs, CO
9,511 posts, read 6,120,024 times
Reputation: 28841
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hoonose View Post
That certainly could be a problem. Same thing happened early on with my wife and HCQ. But we got around it then, and I imagine now with a few calls.
Professional courtesy.

Quote:
Originally Posted by GoldenPineTree View Post
This is not known.

But first this is not what I’m referring to. I’m referring to a study in kids where it was shown kids who got successive Flu vaccines were more likely to catch the Flu.

There was a large Italian study that sought to demonstrate if the Flu vaccine was protective against COVID. The results showed that the group who received regular Flu vaccines were more likely to be hospitalized and have severe outcomes than the group who did not. Then they applied a mathematical model to adjust for different comorbidities, and it’s only there that the Flu vaccine came out as mildly protective. But since the results interpretation relies on this model, it’s a highly abstract result and they should simply control both groups for age and comorbidities.

Interesting enough they noted that for people under 60, regular Flu vaccinations was correlated with catching COVID. They just noted this result as interesting that warranted additional study.
Repeated flu vaccination blunts CD4 T cell reponse.

https://academic.oup.com/jid/article/222/2/273/5554480

Guess what you need a robust CD4 T cell response for? Covid. It's been hypothesized that only vaccinating for the flu every other year would be more beneficial for an individuals protection than vaccinating EVERY year but God Forbid! Who cares about you as an individual? That would decrease UPTAKE. Vaccine UPTAKE is all that matters ...

Quote:
Originally Posted by GoldenPineTree View Post
Hoonose, there is a lot of good studies on how vaccines can alter your immune system. They cannot be "always" additive, this in fact violates the law of physics.

I could go on and on. This has been observed in every vaccine. It's not theoretical. Your body does not have the capacity for indefinite immunity. To build immunity somewhere, it takes from somewhere else.
Yup. "Detrimental non-specific effects".

Quote:
Evidence from multiple observational studies suggests that non-live vaccines, such as DTP vaccine, may increase all-cause mortality, especially in girls, because there is an increased number of deaths from pneumonia and sepsis that outweighs the reduction in deaths from diphtheria, tetanus and pertussis. In a large randomized trial, the non-live RTS,S/AS01 malaria vaccine doubled all-cause mortality in girls in Africa.
https://www.nature.com/articles/s41577-020-0338-x

How I hate that vaccine. The risks outweigh the benefits. Has been known for a long time.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Dave_n_Tenn View Post
Just an FYI... my oldest son who is an Air Traffic Controller was required/forced to vaccinate. Two weeks later he is experiencing Guillain-Barré Syndrome from the J&J vaccine.

He is on administrative/medical leave at this time and will require Medical Clearance to resume his work.

https://www.yalemedicine.org/news/co...barre-syndrome
Oh my gosh, I am so sorry. I understand the grim irony that people are vaccinating to save their livelihood & subsequently; their livelihood is threatened due to the vaccine.
 
Old 10-29-2021, 05:04 PM
 
Location: Southern California
29,266 posts, read 16,791,389 times
Reputation: 18910
Quote:
Originally Posted by 11thHour View Post
Nothing more than the mad ramblings of a conspiracy theorist of his rocker.
He predicted all the issues and deaths from the millions of vaxxed. Look where we are and well over 17K deaths from the unapproved jabs.
 
Old 10-29-2021, 05:04 PM
 
Location: Florida
33,588 posts, read 18,202,736 times
Reputation: 15562
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ponderosa View Post
This has been a topic of much speculation and little data. But today, the CDC released a study showing that unvaccinated people who had gotten a covid infection were 5.49 times more likely to get another than those who were only vaccinated (and did not get covid). They did not address the question of what are the odds if one has had covid and then gets vaccinated or vice versa. This study is further evidence in favor of vaccination over hoping for durable immunity from a prior infection with covid.





https://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/volumes/70/...cid=mm7044e1_w
CDC is not to be trusted. They are so messed up with their message , they are not credible anymore and not to be listened to.
 
Old 10-29-2021, 05:07 PM
 
18,850 posts, read 8,503,346 times
Reputation: 4141
Quote:
Originally Posted by logiatype View Post
How do you know? We don’t do mass testing like we do for Covid. I guess it’s not worth ratcheting up the Influenza fear-mongering.
I practiced in medicine caring for these patients over 45 years. We did and do quite a bit of Influenza testing at least in patients sick enough. Most of the time even when patients are sicker, the Influenza testing is usually negative. No doubt I missed some very mild actual Influenza cases, but clinically it made little difference. We rarely if ever saw groups of cases like with Covid.
 
Old 10-29-2021, 05:07 PM
 
Location: A Nation Possessed
25,882 posts, read 18,904,112 times
Reputation: 22701
Quote:
Originally Posted by Taratova View Post
CDC is not to be trusted. They are so messed up with their message , they are not credible anymore and not to be listened to.
That also applies completely to the federal government, to the majority of state governments, and to many local governments as well.
 
Old 10-29-2021, 05:09 PM
 
Location: Rural Wisconsin
19,842 posts, read 9,407,961 times
Reputation: 38435
When I saw the thread title, my first thought was that this was according to the CDC or some Big-Pharma sponsored study.
 
Old 10-29-2021, 05:11 PM
 
Location: NMB, SC
43,209 posts, read 18,363,097 times
Reputation: 35058
Quote:
Originally Posted by eddie gein View Post
So this study isn't legit because it was funded by "Big pharma"....

Yet climate change denial studies funded by "Big oil" ARE legit.

And the CDC and the FDA are crooked...

Yet the "reporting" program that they co-run (VAERS) is absolute gospel.

Those are different views by different people...not different views by one person.
You do realize there is more than one person with viewpoints..yes ?
 
Old 10-29-2021, 05:12 PM
 
Location: NMB, SC
43,209 posts, read 18,363,097 times
Reputation: 35058
Look we already know the CDC will not accept immunity from having gotten covid as valid.
They said that already.

And Biden's mandate does not account for having immunity either.

So now they have this internal study to back them up.

How convenient.
 
Old 10-29-2021, 05:13 PM
 
6,829 posts, read 2,121,934 times
Reputation: 2591
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ponderosa View Post
I see no problem with the disclosures. They state that the investigators had worked with pharma companies on other unrelated projects in the past. I doubt there is anyone in the field who has not. You can infer what you wish, but your inference is a feeble attempt to discredit the study when you have no facts that support your position that the results are "cooked".
No.

Read the disclosures again. Several scientists get their funding from Pfizer for their "COVID vaccine trials" which would include this one.

What we have here:
  • blatant conflict of interest
    terrible study methodology, vague criteria, opaque and unreproducible results
    flies in the face of common sense - just about every vaccinated person is catching the virus
    flies in the face of better studies

Quote:
Results SARS-CoV-2-naïve vaccinees had a 13.06-fold (95% CI, 8.08 to 21.11) increased risk for breakthrough infection with the Delta variant compared to those previously infected, when the first event (infection or vaccination) occurred during January and February of 2021. The increased risk was significant (P<0.001) for symptomatic disease as well. When allowing the infection to occur at any time before vaccination (from March 2020 to February 2021), evidence of waning natural immunity was demonstrated, though SARS-CoV-2 naïve vaccinees had a 5.96-fold (95% CI, 4.85 to 7.33) increased risk for breakthrough infection and a 7.13-fold (95% CI, 5.51 to 9.21) increased risk for symptomatic disease. SARS-CoV-2-naïve vaccinees were also at a greater risk for COVID-19-related-hospitalizations compared to those that were previously infected.
https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1....24.21262415v1

This is a garbage study that will only see the light on CDC's webpage, for lemmings to quote.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top