Stacy Abrams - Hero, Not "Seditionist"? (Putin, accuse, Pennsylvania)
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Studies show that Democrats are significantly more likely to hold double standards. The mainstream media is a propaganda wing for Democrats so they hold the same double standards.
""I’m not saying they stole it from me. They stole it from the voters of Georgia"...Which is why, four months after the election, Abrams still has no plans to declare Kemp the legitimate winner.
Looks like Trump took a move straight from the Stacey Abrams playbook, using almost the same exact language she uses to describe her Georgia loss. However, where are the disclaimers on YouTube, where are the fact-checking links on any of these articles or videos, where are the social media bans for posting or saying things like this?
""I’m not saying they stole it from me. They stole it from the voters of Georgia"...Which is why, four months after the election, Abrams still has no plans to declare Kemp the legitimate winner.
Looks like Trump took a move straight from the Stacey Abrams playbook, using almost the same exact language she uses to describe her Georgia loss. However, where are the disclaimers on YouTube, where are the fact-checking links on any of these articles or videos, where are the social media bans for posting or saying things like this?
Yup. Where's the "Brian Kemp is the Governor of Georgia" banner to combat this "misinformation?"
Studies show that Democrats are significantly more likely to hold double standards. The mainstream media is a propaganda wing for Democrats so they hold the same double standards.
"Studies show..." Without a link that has about as much credibility as "some people are saying..."
Alas, if the USA used the "popular vote" to elect presidents, this would be relevant.
Except that you don't have an Electoral College count without the popular vote count. Alas.
Quote:
Also, if you make the point of popular votes being close, Trump literally lost the election by 40,000 votes.
Is this alternative math? How is 74 million only 40,000 less than 81 million?
But at least you're admitting he lost the election.
Quote:
Originally Posted by TXRunner
Looks like Trump took a move straight from the Stacey Abrams playbook, using almost the same exact language she uses to describe her Georgia loss. However, where are the disclaimers on YouTube, where are the fact-checking links on any of these articles or videos, where are the social media bans for posting or saying things like this?
How, exactly, did Stacey Abrams attempt to overturn the election results? How many Georgia county elections officials did she call to ask them to find more votes for her?
Location: Somewhere between the Americas and Western Europe
2,180 posts, read 642,484 times
Reputation: 2092
She's black, fat and has a vagina. There's no way she's getting the scrutiny or harsh language that someone else would get with those qualifications under her belt.
Election laws were not changed in Georgia or Arizona yet I keep hearing MAGA's claim they were. I find that typical just repeat what they hear have no clue how elections really works in all these states.
PA election law was changed by the legislature act 77 to allow no excuse vote by mail. The only contention was some ballots which showed up after election day in the end those ballots were not even counted, and didn't amount sufficient numbers to change the outcome in PA.
WI allowed for no excuse voting by mail with the use of clause "indefinitely confined". Trump took that to court and lost.
MI (Michigan) passed 2 bipartisan election laws by their legislatures to allow easier voting by mail
NV They passed Assembly bill 4 to respond to covid allow mailing all registered voters a ballot. Trump sued and lost.
There is some kind of fantasy by Trump Supporters who think that election laws were wildly changed without the legislatures in those states just not true. This is why the Supreme Court refused to hear any of the garbage lawsuits which were attempted.
The affidavits none have panned out to more then conjecture, or opinion. Some of them are now coming to light that the people who were so called experts turned out not to be an Army intel officer was really just a mechanic. The others were voters, and first time poll watchers complaining they really had no idea how counties run elections. None of those situations would change the election outcome anyway.
The rest is complete conspiracy theory.
Last edited by kell490; 01-26-2021 at 11:03 AM..
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
passed 2 bipartisan election laws by their legislatures to allow easier voting by mail 
