Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
the only record she has is 8 years under W Bush National Security and Secretary of State. That's all she has. The foreign policy was a disaster even for conservatives . How is she going to spin that in a primary? She has nothing to run on apart from a failed foreign policy that the more she has to talk about it the more incompetent she looks.
Condoleezza Rice is pro-choice which is the main reason she never ran for president. No way could the GOP swallow that pill.
Well she was a Democrat for 28 years before she realized if she wants to work in the national security area she better be a Republican under the Reagan and HW Bush Presidency. It's hard at that time to be tough on national security as a Democrat.
Forget President, she would have a tough time gaining any seat in her state of Alabama as a pro-choice soft flip flopper of saying enough to win. She says says she is against late term abortions and that she doesn't want the federal government to decide either way. Real weasel answers that she would get crucified in a primary
Democrats doesn't have a leg to stand on. No Presidential candidate can be pro life in the party and have any chance.
It's time to move past the neocons and focus on something better.
Give me a Rand Paul Republican over W, McCain, Condi Rice types.
Too late. We had that opportunity as far back as 2012 but the masses chose Obama and Romney. Then, we had another opportunity in 2016 but the masses chose Trump and Clinton.
Especially in this thespian/pseudo-reality show era of politics, there's no way a person like Ron/Rand Paul is going to win a Presidential election. 2012 and 2016 proved this to be the case and we can kiss that opportunity away forever.
Right now, the biggest choices for Republicans are either MAGA/Trump-adjacent candidates or run-of-the-mill Establishment/Neocon Republicans and there's realistically no other option in terms of electability.
Not only would she be the first female president, but the first black female president.
You know that would stick in their crawl
I don't care for her. IMO, Constance Owns another black female would make a much better president and she is a conservative.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
No you wouldn’t. We all know you blindly vote Democrat like a moron.
