Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
37% and rising. Climate change isn't just an abstract scientific concept, it's starting to kill people. The giveaway that it is manmade climate change is that the increasing rate of heat death is occurring independently across all continents, in parallel with the increasing rate of extreme weather events all across the globe.
Climate change deniers, by spreading disinformation, are complicit in a small way in these deaths.
The worst offender is China. So what do you plan to do about China ?
Sociology, social medicine, social services, social problems....those are the people that put this "study" together ?
Yeah...very objective study....NOT
The worst offender is China. So what do you plan to do about China ?
True that. They are totally ignoring the agreement all the other countries made about not disturbing Antarctica and here China is, plowing through the ice and setting up oil drilling and no one is stopping them.
Don’t confuse me with facts, my mind is made up.
The only problem Freak80 is that there is NO facts.
It's a simulation.
https://github.com/anavica/mcc_ccattr_NCC
"...temperature-mortality data of 10 hypothetical cities and the corresponding simulated temperature for 10 models defining the two scenarios."
37% and rising. Climate change isn't just an abstract scientific concept, it's starting to kill people. The giveaway that it is manmade climate change is that the increasing rate of heat death is occurring independently across all continents, in parallel with the increasing rate of extreme weather events all across the globe.
Climate change deniers, by spreading disinformation, are complicit in a small way in these deaths.
The worst offender is China. So what do you plan to do about China ?
Sociology, social medicine, social services, social problems....those are the people that put this "study" together ?
Yeah...very objective study....NOT
She did it first, Mom.
All ya'll in the party of personal responsibility have been telling us for years we should only control what we do. Let others be responsible for their own actions. It works. Just ask Pemex or BP.
If I say so? I didn't write the journal article. Oh, and you're not going to get published in Nature unless it passes muster for academic integrity and proper scientific analysis.
Quote:
Originally Posted by TMSRetired
The worst offender is China. So what do you plan to do about China ?
Carbon tax. If every good sold in the U.S. included a carbon tax based on how it's transported, Chinese goods would have a high carbon tax because container ships consume huge amounts of the dirtiest diesel oil there is. Domestically made goods that are transported short distances, especially by electric or hybrid trucks, would pay very little carbon tax by comparison.
A transportation carbon tax would encourage more domestic production and discourage the importation of Chinese-made goods while reducing CO2. Which is what conservatives want, isn't it?
Last edited by Elliott_CA; 07-05-2021 at 09:49 AM..
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
It works. Just ask Pemex or BP.
