Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
There's correlation between the bad judgement necessary for a man to have a man-bun and making stupid political gestures. Pro-tip: Anytime you see a man sporting a man bun, he's probably a effeminate soy boy noodle-armed lefty.
College kids having their lunch on the campus lawn and along comes man bun, swiping their Big Macs in protest of animal cruelty. Along comes ClaraC to defend him.
And those of you late to the game , you are always late to the game so be sure it is probably already there.
still trying to decipher this prattle. it seems to aver as fact that not being the first to post a thread on any given topic - even a single time - means that said poster will continue to forever not be first on any other given topic.
anyone doing that would be in jail on 'hate crime' charges, assuming they escaped being beaten to death by crazed leftist moonbats.
Exactly the point. Preaching acceptance shouldn't be a one way street. I see a day in the future when the books will have to be re-written concerning 9-11 because the WOKE people are offended by the United States of America's role in causing the attack on US soil.
still trying to decipher this prattle. it seems to aver as fact that not being the first to post a thread on any given topic - even a single time - means that said poster will continue to forever not be first on any other given topic.
it's really quite silly.
Silly? Maybe ....-- it means if you have been accused before of posting on an event or issue that already has a thread for it --most likely -- because you are busy with other things so not meaning anything derogatory -- but most likely -- you are posting on something that has already been commented on.
Silly? Maybe ....-- it means if you have been accused before of posting on an event or issue that already has a thread for it --most likely -- because you are busy with other things so not meaning anything derogatory -- but most likely -- you are posting on something that has already been commented on.
Yeah, people should check first but it isn't as bad as those who only read and comment on a thread topic without ever reading other responses first.
Too many times, the title was debunked within the first 4 responses but the thread responses (to the bad title only)went on for pages.
Yeah, people should check first but it isn't as bad as those who only read and comment on a thread topic without ever reading other responses first.
Too many times, the title was debunked within the first 4 responses but the thread responses (to the bad title only)went on for pages.
True -- but sometimes so many pages.
I often will preface my response by -- haven't read all the responses but.....
Status:
"I don't understand. But I don't care, so it works out."
(set 10 days ago)
35,636 posts, read 17,982,736 times
Reputation: 50678
Quote:
Originally Posted by Blues4evr
The proper way to handle his offended self was to take his complaint to proper authority. Sorry those who set them up has rights too
The first amendment is very tricky and often creates outrage. But it wasn’t designed to keep people from being offended. Exactly the opposite. And yes, it’s offensive when someone picks up memorial flags and carries them away in a plastic bag. But then you have to take a deep breath and know that’s what the founding fathers envisioned when they wrote that amendment and gave it very first billing.
Those who put them there had also used their first amendment right
The first amendment is very tricky and often creates outrage. But it wasn’t designed to keep people from being offended. Exactly the opposite. And yes, it’s offensive when someone picks up memorial flags and carries them away in a plastic bag. But then you have to take a deep breath and know that’s what the founding fathers envisioned when they wrote that amendment and gave it very first billing.
Those who put them there had also used their first amendment right
ClaraC....did the flags belong to somebody else? Yes or no?
The first amendment is very tricky and often creates outrage. But it wasn’t designed to keep people from being offended. Exactly the opposite. And yes, it’s offensive when someone picks up memorial flags and carries them away in a plastic bag. But then you have to take a deep breath and know that’s what the founding fathers envisioned when they wrote that amendment and gave it very first billing.
Those who put them there had also used their first amendment right
i doubt the founding fathers ever envisioned addlepated leftists claiming that theft and removal of other people's property was 'free speech.'
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
