Why did so many Republican change their minds on the Jan 6 riot (compared, support)

[erieguy]

Originally Posted by No_Recess

Jack Ruby?

Nope.

Link to who called it a “quiet peaceful protest”?

[No_Recess]

Originally Posted by erieguy

Nope.

Link to who called it a “quiet peaceful protest”?

Gay frogs?

[erieguy]

Originally Posted by No_Recess

Gay frogs?

In other words, more claims with nothing to back them up…only because Trump.

[No_Recess]

Originally Posted by erieguy

In other words, more claims with nothing to back them up…only because Trump.

LOL

You didn't even quote me correctly so I'm giving you jibberish answers.

Well, jibberish to me. I'm not in the cult.

[erieguy]

Originally Posted by No_Recess

LOL

You didn't even quote me correctly so I'm giving you jibberish answers.

Well, jibberish to me. I'm not in the cult.

Another excellent attempt at deflection, but still zero proof to your claims. Because Trump obviously did a real number on you.

[ansible90]

Originally Posted by Vector1

That is giving too much credence to the fake news of an attempted Trump/Republican narrative the leftists what to promote.

A handful of bare chested horn wearing yahoos and kooks getting into the capitol, with the assistance of the capitol police (needs to be investigated more thoroughly), was hardly an attempted coup or insurrection.
If those on the right really had planned such an event, strategic military planning, heavy weapons, etc. would have been involved.

By why take the effort to reexplain it to the sheep that will believe any false narrative the Democrats, and their propaganda ministry of the MSM brainwash them with.


`

FYI. Weapons, heavy or light, are not required to attempt an insurrection or coup.

Good luck trying to walk around the streets of DC brandishing weapons. Especially near the Capitol.

[erieguy]

Originally Posted by ansible90

FYI. Weapons, heavy or light, are not required to attempt an insurrection or coup.

Good luck trying to walk around the streets of DC brandishing weapons. Especially near the Capitol.

How were they going to attempt an insurrection with no weapons, and a huge number of armed Capitol police officers in and around the Capitol?

They didn’t have any weapons, but why would they have to be brandished?

[ansible90]

Originally Posted by erieguy

How were they going to attempt an insurrection with no weapons, and a huge number of armed Capitol police officers in and around the Capitol?

They didn’t have any weapons, but why would they have to be brandished?

The definitions of insurrection and coup do not require weapons. Dictionary.com is your friend.

[erieguy]

Originally Posted by ansible90

The definitions of insurrection and coup do not require weapons. Dictionary.com is your friend.

It wasn’t an insurrection or a coup. Facts are your friend…and without weapons nobody’s going to attempt it, especially with so many armed police.

[momonkey]

Originally Posted by erieguy

How were they going to do it with no weapons and so many Capitol police?

That's easy!

Step one, bait capital hill police into shooting unarmed protestors in the neck until all their ammo is used up.

Step two, declare a free and independent state while they reload.

The plan would have worked except only one capital hill police officer was trigger happy enough to kill one of the unarmed protestors.