Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
These companies paused their vax mandates because the federal vax-or-test mandate for companies with 100+ employees has been paused due to ongoing lawsuits.
I get the feeling that these corporations were perfectly willing to stick it to us (pun somewhat intended) but didn't have the guts to do it themselves, so they hid behind the government mandate. ("See, we're helpless! The big bad government is making us do it!") Now that their cover had been ripped away, they had to stand on their own tyranny. And it appears that they didn't have the fortitude to do it. For which I'm glad.
These companies paused their vax mandates because the federal vax-or-test mandate for companies with 100+ employees has been paused due to ongoing lawsuits.
So it's not really about protecting people. It's about power and control.
These companies paused their vax mandates because the federal vax-or-test mandate for companies with 100+ employees has been paused due to ongoing lawsuits.
Yes, the original article posted at the beginning of the thread specifically cites that.
Probably the first lawsuits from those injured by vaccines have started to roll in and guess who is going to be sued. Biden? Fauci? Oh, noooos. It'll be the corporations who coerced their employees into getting vaccinated who are going to pay the price for this.
Biden is not your friend folks. We tried to tell you.
This is a glimmer of light through the rolling clouds of a storm.
We will be truly redeemed when we put Fauci and many charlatans at the head of HHS, NIH, FDA, and CDC on trial for corruption, conspiracy (in suppression of off-label pharmaceuticals). But this will probably not happen.
But anyways, still good news. May the bell of freedom chime, even if it's hard to hear it sometime.
In a perfect world, this would all be televised.
In a more-perfect world, so would their executions.
Normally, I'd disagree. Prior to this pandemic, I would have wanted agencies looking out for the public, and holding bigPharma to task for safety, etc.
But at this point, I come to realize that thanks to regulatory capture, they just became the wolf in sheep's clothing, and got through the gate and into the flock of sheep.
So yes, disband it all, and have every drug be accessible without a prescription. Safety can still be done, and doctor's recommendations can still be heeded, if needed.
But I'm done when Fauci/etc used taxpayer dollars (through tax write offs for donations) to obtain 66 million doses of HCQ, stockpile them at BARDA, and deny their distribution to save American lives. In some cases, millions of doses were destroyed.
Silly idea, work hand in hand with say UK, Germany, Canada etc on new drug approvals. We could have a much smaller FDA as a small sanity check at the end.
Then again, this might reduce a few avenues for big pharma to bribe... er I mean lobby congress for favorable laws.
From a strictly logistical point of view, mandates are a hideous idea.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
