Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 05-05-2022, 12:04 PM
 
Location: Middle of nowhere
24,260 posts, read 14,221,070 times
Reputation: 9895

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by MissTerri View Post
what if no one wants to take care of the infant. It’s a lot of work. Much harder than being pregnant in my experience.
Yet another reason to not ban abortions. Maybe the woman who is pregnant doesn't want to take care of an infant either.

 
Old 05-05-2022, 12:04 PM
 
26,660 posts, read 13,759,879 times
Reputation: 19118
Quote:
Originally Posted by StillwaterTownie View Post
It's coming in some states if not already there or impending. Any form of birth control that interferes with the fertilized egg must be banned.
Where?
 
Old 05-05-2022, 12:04 PM
 
Location: Wisconsin
25,573 posts, read 56,502,335 times
Reputation: 23386
Quote:
Originally Posted by ClaraC View Post
Kelly acknowledged that the idea that it was someone on the right, who wanted to cement the votes for repealing Roe V Wade and not allow wavering conservatives to change their minds, is very plausible.
I think they've very effectively done that. Roberts may even vote for it, now.
 
Old 05-05-2022, 12:07 PM
 
Location: Stillwater, Oklahoma
30,976 posts, read 21,655,075 times
Reputation: 9676
Quote:
Originally Posted by InformedConsent View Post
People abuse drugs all the time.
No doubt to you women who take abortion inducing drugs are abusing drugs. Don't you quite strongly support prison terms for women who use those drugs to achieve a successful abortion? Might as well also support laws that put people in prison who sell such drugs.
 
Old 05-05-2022, 12:08 PM
 
Location: the very edge of the continent
89,060 posts, read 44,877,895 times
Reputation: 13718
Quote:
Originally Posted by ClaraC View Post
It's practically a ban on abortion.
Even you have to twist words. Because... NOPE. It's NOT a ban on abortion. Stop lying.
 
Old 05-05-2022, 12:09 PM
 
Location: the very edge of the continent
89,060 posts, read 44,877,895 times
Reputation: 13718
Quote:
Originally Posted by StillwaterTownie View Post
Doesn't that make you extremely furious?
I don't live in TX.
 
Old 05-05-2022, 12:11 PM
 
Location: Stillwater, Oklahoma
30,976 posts, read 21,655,075 times
Reputation: 9676
Quote:
Originally Posted by berdee View Post
"nearly" is not a complete ban, as you've been trying to push it is. They will still have quite a bit of time to kill and in CA and maybe other states after birth too...which will "bring you tears of joy running down your face", right?
No, way. The fewer abortions, the better. Nothing better than tears of joy running down a woman's face when she discovers she is going to have a very dearly wanted baby. I want even more pregnancies, like that.
 
Old 05-05-2022, 12:14 PM
 
Location: Lyon, France, Whidbey Island WA
20,836 posts, read 17,115,957 times
Reputation: 11535
A new Sheriff.

From NPR
"Col. Gail Curley, a former U.S. Army attorney, has served as the court's marshal since June 2021. Now she's tasked with finding the source of possibly the biggest leaks in modern Supreme Court history — even though it doesn't appear to involve any sort of crime."

I do wonder if it was a crime.
 
Old 05-05-2022, 12:15 PM
 
Location: Lyon, France, Whidbey Island WA
20,836 posts, read 17,115,957 times
Reputation: 11535
Quote:
Originally Posted by StillwaterTownie View Post
No, way. The fewer abortions, the better. Nothing better than tears of joy running down a woman's face when she discovers she is going to have a very dearly wanted baby. I want even more pregnancies, like that.
It's a child miraculous and pure.
 
Old 05-05-2022, 12:17 PM
 
Location: Stillwater, Oklahoma
30,976 posts, read 21,655,075 times
Reputation: 9676
Quote:
Originally Posted by InformedConsent View Post
Again, there is NO state that is planning on banning abortion. I honestly don't get why the left just can't understand that. Why the completely unnecessary hystrionics for something that isn’t even happening?
But like it or not, you're so profoundly WRONG. Tell me something, InformedConsent, how easy do you think it will be to find a doctor for an abortion in Oklahoma knowing if he gives an abortion that he is subject to 10 years in prison and a $100,000 fine. No exceptions, other than to save life of mother. It's quite obvious you don't know just how extreme these near abortion bans are. Do you also not realize the Oklahoma governor has said he will sign any anti-abortion bill that is passed? In the recent past one Oklahoma state senator tried to ban literally all abortion. No regulations, no exceptions. Fortunately, it was seen as so extreme it got nowhere. But who knows how many people out there would support such a thing? For a hint, a poll indicated that 19% would.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Closed Thread


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 10:12 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top