Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 05-05-2022, 11:39 AM
Status: "I don't understand. But I don't care, so it works out." (set 29 days ago)
 
35,774 posts, read 18,115,470 times
Reputation: 50853

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by InformedConsent View Post
I see no reason why states would ever ban all abortions. That's medically contraindicated in some cases.
States who don't make allowances for 11 year old girls carrying a 10 week old embryo, IMHO, would be just as likely to ban all abortions if they legally could.

Any government who would force an 11 year old to carry a baby to term, IMHO, is capable of forcing all pregnant females to carry to term once impregnated.

 
Old 05-05-2022, 11:41 AM
 
Location: the very edge of the continent
89,325 posts, read 45,057,338 times
Reputation: 13794
Quote:
Originally Posted by ClaraC View Post
States who don't make allowances for 11 year old girls carrying a 10 week old embryo, IMHO, would be just as likely to ban all abortions if they legally could.

Any government who would force an 11 year old to carry a baby to term, IMHO, is capable of forcing all pregnant females to carry to term once impregnated.
Which states are those? Why wouldn't it be possible for an MD to conclude that an 11 yo can't carry a pregnancy to term without serious risk to her health?
 
Old 05-05-2022, 11:42 AM
 
Location: deafened by howls of 'racism!!!'
52,906 posts, read 34,736,201 times
Reputation: 29388
Quote:
Originally Posted by berdee View Post
It's only a parasite to those who hate children and science, obviously.

Quote:
Instead of being passive tissue that absorbs available nutrients from the mother, the placenta dynamically distributes nutrients between mother and fetus, optimally ensuring the health of both mother and developing baby… [by] receiv[ing] metabolic signals from both the mother and fetus and respond[ing] to this input by regulating the nutrient amounts made available to the fetus. ...

… [i]t appears that when the mother is healthy, the placenta readily transports nutrients to the fetus and dynamically adjusts, even if it forms abnormally…. [i]f the mother’s health is compromised, the placenta restricts nutrient flow to the fetus to ensure the mother’s long-term health, with the prospects that the fetus can still grow and develop.
https://www.liveaction.org/news/stud...guments-false/
*leftists furiously googling in vain for an example of an actual parasite that obtains nourishment via a placenta*
 
Old 05-05-2022, 11:42 AM
 
30,275 posts, read 11,909,925 times
Reputation: 18727
Quote:
Originally Posted by berdee View Post
"nearly" is not a complete ban, as you've been trying to push it is. They will still have quite a bit of time to kill and in CA and maybe other states after birth too...which will "bring you tears of joy running down your face", right?

More than half the abortions performed yearly are "medication abortions". So it will still go on in all 50 states.
 
Old 05-05-2022, 11:43 AM
 
Location: 23.7 million to 162 million miles North of Venus
23,981 posts, read 12,772,585 times
Reputation: 10616
Quote:
Originally Posted by ClaraC View Post
States who don't make allowances for 11 year old girls carrying a 10 week old embryo, IMHO, would be just as likely to ban all abortions if they legally could.

Any government who would force an 11 year old to carry a baby to term, IMHO, is capable of forcing all pregnant females to carry to term once impregnated.
What states don't allow abortion when the mothers life is in danger? And the life of a pregnant 11yo would be in danger.
 
Old 05-05-2022, 11:44 AM
 
Location: 23.7 million to 162 million miles North of Venus
23,981 posts, read 12,772,585 times
Reputation: 10616
Quote:
Originally Posted by uggabugga View Post
*leftists furiously googling in vain for an example of an actual parasite that uses a placenta*
Yep. And probably running to dem chat boards as we speak.
 
Old 05-05-2022, 11:45 AM
 
26,660 posts, read 13,802,268 times
Reputation: 19118
Quote:
Originally Posted by jjrose View Post
Or a bottle which can be given by anyone. A fetus is dependent on only one person no one can take over the support for that fetus.
what if no one wants to take care of the infant. It’s a lot of work. Much harder than being pregnant in my experience.
 
Old 05-05-2022, 11:46 AM
 
11,413 posts, read 7,839,229 times
Reputation: 21928
Quote:
Originally Posted by InformedConsent View Post
FALSE. Abortion will not be banned in TX.
The Texas law is tantamount to a ban given the tiny slice of time between when a women knows she’s pregnant and what’s left to schedule an abortion. But no worries. Women with the means will just travel to other States. The ones that can’t will have those oh so longed for by Texans babies and watch them go hungry. But no matter. Texas will still claim it did the “right” thing because Texas loves babies (the unborn kid not the hungry kind). The hungry kind just need to pull themselves up by their bootiestraps and get a damn job.
 
Old 05-05-2022, 11:48 AM
 
18,420 posts, read 19,075,680 times
Reputation: 15744
Quote:
Originally Posted by MissTerri View Post
what if no one wants to take care of the infant. It’s a lot of work. Much harder than being pregnant in my experience.
There’s always someone that wants to care for an infant. From the foster care system to potential adoptive parents to the infants own relatives.
 
Old 05-05-2022, 11:49 AM
 
Location: the very edge of the continent
89,325 posts, read 45,057,338 times
Reputation: 13794
Quote:
Originally Posted by UNC4Me View Post
The Texas law is tantamount to a ban given the tiny slice of time between when a women knows she’s pregnant and what’s left to schedule an abortion. But no worries. Women with the means will just travel to other States. The ones that can’t will have those oh so longed for by Texans babies and watch them go hungry. But no matter. Texas will still claim it did the “right” thing because Texas loves babies (the unborn kid not the hungry kind).
Nope. They have to twist words and assume people are stupid to make it sound like it's a ban. It's not.

TX law is not a ban on abortion.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Closed Thread


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 06:07 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top