***SCOTUS has ruled on Roe V Wade*** (March, conservatives, illegal)
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Without the landmark precedent in place, access to abortion began to change quickly. First, 13 states with “trigger bans,” designed to take effect if Roe were struck down, will prohibit abortion within 30 days. At least eight states banned the procedure the day the ruling was released.
That's a lie. We the taxpayers have paid for decades for massive welfare and earned income credits (government actual gives money for children that parents never paid in taxes) So stop insulting the taxpayers that We don't pay enough or don't care.
I am referring to posters on this very forum who have been very clear in their posts... they want to eliminate abortions but have no intention of paying one dime more for the extra babies who will be born. This has been clearly explained by a significant number of posters in recent abortion threads.
The person with the effected uterus is the person who makes the decision.
*affected
And, no, if two people are involved in the creation of a baby, then both people should have an equal say when it comes to the fate of said baby.
If they do not have equal rights when it comes to the consequence of the action (the baby), then they should not have equal responsibility when it comes to preventing that consequence.
I am referring to posters on this very forum who have been very clear in their posts... they want to eliminate abortions but have no intention of paying one dime more for the extra babies who will be born. This has been clearly explained by a significant number of posters in recent abortion threads.
I am one of those posters. I resent the idea that I can be responsible and not have babies out of wedlock, yet I'm still expected to clean up the messes of the irresponsible. No, thanks.
the RIGHT to an abortion was NEVER mentioned, nor protected by the Constitution
a legal case, having NOTHING TO DO WITH THE CONSTITUTION is what r-v-w was
maybe you should take up civics and learn something
Women were never mentioned in the Constitution either. Where does that leave us? A lot of things were not mentioned in the Constitution yet we have many federal laws on a variety of things. Do these laws all have to be reviewed now?
And, no, if two people are involved in the creation of a baby, then both people should have an equal say when it comes to the fate of said baby.
If they do not have equal rights when it comes to the consequence of the action (the baby), then they should not have equal responsibility when it comes to preventing that consequence.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
