Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Now justice Thomas is going after the rights for contraceptions and same-sex marriage, so they’re not banning abortion to save lives after all. They just want to impose their religious views on the American people.
Now justice Thomas is going after the rights for contraceptions and same-sex marriage, so they’re not banning abortion to save lives after all. They just want to impose their religious views on the American people.
of course they do! its power baby, power. Makes them feel potent when they can control the women. Alot like slavery.
All of the states that ban or restrict abortion are red states, which are also against welfare system. The system supports poor young mothers. They just want to control women’s rights. They know it won’t stop women who want or need the abortion doing so, even with the ban. It will greatly affect poor women and color women since that the group of women who won’t be able to afford to go to the blue states to get a safe abortion. These red states also just want to pawn off their issues to the blue states, a selfish and irresponsible political moves.
And one could say that the "blue states" don't care about Women of Color figuring it's just better to kill off their babies instead of trying to help them.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Nut4sweets
It’s good idea for all sensible women of reproductive years to only have intercourses with men who already had successful vasectomies with doctor’s note to prove it, and have IVF only when they’re ready to have children. With IVF, they don’t even need to do the reversal procedure.
Or how about this. If a woman doesn't want to have a baby, then keep their legs closed. Just like if a man doesn't want a baby, keep his pants zipped up.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Nut4sweets
This ruling is a bad move for such a great country like the US. It happens because we have some unqualified supreme justices who are not experienced nor intelligent enough nor care enough about the people of this country to be easily influenced by their political motives. Our country is great as a whole, but it’s no longer a great one when it becomes so divisive. This ruling does just that.
Or the justices are intelligent enough to realize that there was nothing in the Constitution that gave them that authority in the first place. So they moved the decision back to the States. Perhaps you should channel your anger on those states and work with those states to get laws put in place to allow abortion. Or is that too much and you just prefer to complain?
Quote:
Originally Posted by Nut4sweets
This country has been my beloved home for me and for many immigrants as well
as all patriotic people of Americans, but it has been falling apart after the 2016 election. I’m so heartbroken right now for our country as a whole. I feel sorry for our daughters and granddaughters and all the women generations from now on. I am fortunate enough to still be able to afford to live in a blue state. I’ve never before considered retiring abroad, but this ruling starts to sway my thinking regarding that. It maybe a good time to get that extra citizenship in Greece or Portugal as some have already done.
Well if you hate the US that much over this issue then don't let the door hit you on the way out...
Quote:
Originally Posted by Nut4sweets
Now justice Thomas is going after the rights for contraceptions and same-sex marriage, so they’re not banning abortion to save lives after all. They just want to impose their religious views on the American people.
Actually NO. He said it should be "reconsidered". He can't go after anything that isn't brought up to them, and it has nothing to do with religion. Ironically if it wasn't for the Progressive Left agenda to keep pushing and trying to move the bar, the Dobbs case would likely have never have even been brought up to the Supreme Court. So if you want to look at really who to "blame", perhaps take a look at the same Progressives.
Oh and one other thing. All we seem to hear from the Left is that 70% of the people feel abortion should be allowed. The Democrats have known that this eventually might end up in the Supreme Court. Yet over the last several Democratic Presidents with Democratic majorities, Clinton, Obama, and Biden, there has never been any real attempt to Codify Abortion into law. With Obama and the majority he had, it would have been a cakewalk. Yet here we are...
The Progressives in Congress aren't saying that they are working on law. They are out there telling people to riot, protest, and outright ignore the US Supreme Court. Supreme Court justices have had to go to "Safe Houses" because this administration not only hasn't condemned this rhetoric, they condone it.
Great. A female underclass. Maybe we should build some ghettos to house them in.
Or we can just house them where we set up the illegal immigrants pouring across the border. No one seems to be concerned about them and the associated costs.
and there will be some that want to ban abortion entirely:
1. Who will pay for prenatal care if the mother can't afford it? (For example, Texas leads the nation in teen pregnancies.)
2. How will states deal with an increase in babies the parents can't afford? How will social programs to feed these babies be expanded?
3. Will state-funded DNA testing be automatically enacted to confirm paternity? How will paternity tests be bodily forced upon accused fathers?
4. Will stiffer penalties, including prison, be enforced against fathers who refuse to pay child support? Will the mothers be represented pro bono if they can't afford attorneys to ensure this happens?
5. Will rape charges be brought by the state if the girl is underage and the man isn't?
Christians. Historically we adopt at 2x the national average, build shelters, pregnancy centers, etc.
I don't know of any Christian that is wringing his hands whining that he will have to help a baby or mom.
and there will be some that want to ban abortion entirely:
1. Who will pay for prenatal care if the mother can't afford it? (For example, Texas leads the nation in teen pregnancies.)
2. How will states deal with an increase in babies the parents can't afford? How will social programs to feed these babies be expanded?
3. Will state-funded DNA testing be automatically enacted to confirm paternity? How will paternity tests be bodily forced upon accused fathers?
4. Will stiffer penalties, including prison, be enforced against fathers who refuse to pay child support? Will the mothers be represented pro bono if they can't afford attorneys to ensure this happens?
5. Will rape charges be brought by the state if the girl is underage and the man isn't?
Of course there are endless questions. It's no different than any other question about life.
What is murder?
Do we treat all murders the same way?
When is it self defense and when is it not self defense?
Is it okay to pull the plug on a person in a vegetative state and who decides that?
Should assisted suicide be illegal?
If a pregnant woman is murdered, is it a double-homicide?
Is it okay for a brutal murderer to be put to death by the government?
When is it acceptable to remove children from the custody of their parents?
How do you define rape and what is the punishment for it?
The state governments have figured out the answers to these questions and no two states have done it exactly the same way. If New York wants to pass a law stating that life begins on your 5th birthday and you can be legally aborted up to that point, then that's the law in New York. If Oklahoma passes laws against any and all abortion and suddenly a whole bunch of accommodation is needed for women who can no longer get an abortion, then they'll have to figure that out. The states just barely got ability to decide anything abortion-related back, so it's going to take awhile for them to sort everything out.
It's the "hopefully" part that is unrealistic. How do you make an irresponsible person be responsible? You can't. So then you have irresponsible parents raising kids who become irresponsible themselves.
and there will be some that want to ban abortion entirely:
1. Who will pay for prenatal care if the mother can't afford it? (For example, Texas leads the nation in teen pregnancies.)
2. How will states deal with an increase in babies the parents can't afford? How will social programs to feed these babies be expanded?
3. Will state-funded DNA testing be automatically enacted to confirm paternity? How will paternity tests be bodily forced upon accused fathers?
4. Will stiffer penalties, including prison, be enforced against fathers who refuse to pay child support? Will the mothers be represented pro bono if they can't afford attorneys to ensure this happens?
5. Will rape charges be brought by the state if the girl is underage and the man isn't?
Don't be silly. The deep-red states already sport record-breaking numbers for infant mortality. They don't care.
This about making certain that loose women feel the consequences of their immoral ways. Having a few destitute women and their children just provides handy examples. What's the fun in showing off your own impeccably moral life if you don't have some sinners to look down on?
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
