Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 08-10-2022, 12:45 PM
 
Location: Femboyville
1,483 posts, read 685,205 times
Reputation: 2192

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by DRob4JC View Post
I think many of the bozos are in this thread.
The fools who are covering for him, sure.

Of course... he can set the record straight by releasing the warrant. So simple, will take a minimum of time.

He likes the spotlight, no? I can't of a better reason to turn on the lights, fire up the cameras, and step up to the mic than this.

Why won't he do it?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 08-10-2022, 12:58 PM
 
18,469 posts, read 8,292,857 times
Reputation: 13791
well the fools are covering up something...that's for sure

Reinhart sealed the warrants....you want to see them....ask Reinhart

FBI got rid of all witnesses

...all Trump has to say is he declassified it all

So what did Trump have....that the FBI and all the rest of them.....didn't want to get out
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-10-2022, 01:11 PM
 
Location: Femboyville
1,483 posts, read 685,205 times
Reputation: 2192
Quote:
Originally Posted by Corrie22 View Post
well the fools are covering up something...that's for sure

Reinhart sealed the warrants....you want to see them....ask Reinhart

FBI got rid of all witnesses

...all Trump has to say is he declassified it all

So what did Trump have....that the FBI and all the rest of them.....didn't want to get out
Wrong, the AFFIDAVIT supporting the warrant is sealed, not the warrant itself. Trump has a copy of it.

I mean... you DO want to know if this was legitimate or not, right?

He can clear this all up in mere minutes...
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-10-2022, 01:13 PM
 
46,973 posts, read 26,018,521 times
Reputation: 29459
Quote:
Originally Posted by Euskalherria View Post
Wrong, the AFFIDAVIT supporting the warrant is sealed, not the warrant itself. Trump has a copy of it.
As is SOP for search warrants, by the way.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-10-2022, 01:23 PM
 
8,131 posts, read 4,332,087 times
Reputation: 4683
Quote:
Originally Posted by treasurefinder View Post
In his zeal to persecute Hillary, Trump signed a law in 2018, making the removal of classified documents a felony. The penalty was changed from one year to five years making it a felony.

LMAO you can’t make this ish up!
A felony? Felonies generally have a potential punishment of over a year of incarceration. Lock Him Up! Lock Him Up! Lock Him Up!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-10-2022, 01:23 PM
 
18,469 posts, read 8,292,857 times
Reputation: 13791
Quote:
Originally Posted by Euskalherria View Post
Wrong, the AFFIDAVIT supporting the warrant is sealed, not the warrant itself. Trump has a copy of it.

I mean... you DO want to know if this was legitimate or not, right?

He can clear this all up in mere minutes...
exactly....the contents of the warrant are sealed

without the contents....the warrant will tell you nothing except what they are authorized to do

.....not why

if the contents say they can seize classified documents..all Trump has to say is that he declassified them
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-10-2022, 01:29 PM
 
5,581 posts, read 2,310,805 times
Reputation: 4809
Quote:
Originally Posted by Corrie22 View Post
...
if the contents say they can seize classified documents..all Trump has to say is that he declassified them
Trump would have had to de-classify them in writing while president or tell others they were classified while president and someone would need to have records of each document being declassified (when and how).
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-10-2022, 01:47 PM
 
18,469 posts, read 8,292,857 times
Reputation: 13791
Quote:
Originally Posted by Variable View Post
Trump would have had to de-classify them in writing while president or tell others they were classified while president and someone would need to have records of each document being declassified (when and how).
nope....constitution does not say that...there is no set procedure for that
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-10-2022, 01:49 PM
 
Location: Raleigh NC
25,116 posts, read 16,229,466 times
Reputation: 14408
Quote:
Originally Posted by treasurefinder View Post
In his zeal to persecute Hillary, Trump signed a law in 2018, making the removal of classified documents a felony. The penalty was changed from one year to five years making it a felony.

LMAO you can’t make this ish up!
so every law Congress created that Trump signed is a law "he did" now?

it was FISA Extension, introduced by Orrin Hatch, co-sponsored by 12 fairly evenly split between R & D. Passed the Senate by unanimous consent. R's in the House voted 4-1 in favor, Dems 2-1 against. Then after a minor House Amendment passed 2-1 in the Senate, with 7 R's voting no and 21 Dems voting yes.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-10-2022, 11:09 PM
 
Location: Native of Any Beach/FL
35,711 posts, read 21,081,460 times
Reputation: 14257
Quote:
Originally Posted by prospectheightsresident View Post
What this will come down to is whether Trump declassified the documents and who actually removed the documents (for liability purposes). I don't even know the process for the president to formally declassify documents. Is it a simple "they are declassified" statement or is something more required? I don't know. I've seen procedures for general original classification authorities to declassify documents, but never for the president.
There’s a very specific way to handle govt documents. They are classified in a certain manner and can only pass certain hands or even travel on certain ways. They belong to the US govt. So taking anything is prohibited if not approved. Disposal of documents also is specified by time frames and process. When it comes to that- it’s very strict. I don’t know What they are looking for. Having docts can be illegal. Trying to hide docs that show some discrepancy - that’s bad.
He declassifiying anything does not change the correct way to handle the docs. Can’t throw them in the fireplace because changed the status of those docts.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 03:30 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top